Jump to content

Rowand44

Mod Emeritus
  • Posts

    41,151
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Rowand44

  1. UNI vs Washington tomorrow. I wouldn't be surprised if the Panthers take the Huskies down, in fact I'm expecting the upset here.
  2. QUOTE(Dick Allen @ Nov 13, 2006 -> 10:27 PM) This Rowand love is ridiculous. Anderson and Rowand had similar offensive stats the season they were 24. When Rowand turned 25, he was hitting so poorly Carl Everett had to play CF. A late season surge made his numbers respectable. Rowand hit well in 2004, but has been fairly mediocre ever since. I would take Anderson any day of the week over Rowand defensively, I don't care how many times Rowand crashes into a wall. I think KW would be better served using the money on pitching. Ding! Next Topic.
  3. Rowand44

    PS3

    I'm going to buy one just to sell it as well. Still trying to figure out the best place to camp out for one and how early.
  4. Rowand44

    Films

    I got dragged to "stranger than fiction" today. Not good.
  5. QUOTE(Chisoxfn @ Nov 13, 2006 -> 04:40 PM) I have absolutely no doubt I got it right. My grammar sucks but shockingly I typically do very good on verbal portions of standardized tests. I typically know the rules, but just don't follow them in my day to day typing. Its = it is It's = posessive hahahahahahaha, you're awesome.
  6. Keep him unless you can get something very nice in return. He's definitely not a guy I want to give away.
  7. QUOTE(Soxy @ Nov 13, 2006 -> 03:17 PM) How do you think you did on the its/it's one? lol, ZING
  8. QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Nov 13, 2006 -> 02:46 PM) Gammons - Boston won bidding with 42 million Sports Illustrated - http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/base...drew/index.html So, Boston just has 55+ million laying around this offseason? HOw the hell can they afford this? Yeesh. I'm a big fan of Mats but that's ridiculous what they bid for him. And they can have JD Drew, that team needs more pitching not more offense.
  9. SIU's 07 gem, Carlton Fay, is the class A preseason player of the year according to midstatehoops.com http://www.midstatehoops.com/articles/2006...teamclassa.html
  10. QUOTE(chimpy2121 @ Nov 13, 2006 -> 12:46 AM) The Noles took care of McNeese State 85-65. Good game by the Noles after getting off to a slow start. I'm worried about our inside game though. We face a Valley team tomorrow in Illinois State who lost a heartbreaker to SMU before the Nole game started. It was a fun game to watch though since ISU came back from like 11 down to tie it up only to be defeated by a tip in with time expiring. ISU(the Illinois one, not the stupid Iowa one ) is a very dangerous team.
  11. I think I'll be seeing that one.
  12. Rowand44

    The OC?!

    QUOTE(IlliniKrush @ Nov 12, 2006 -> 01:40 AM) OMG WHAT EVER WILL WE DO Oh crap man, what if this interferes with Laguna Beach? Then What?
  13. QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Nov 12, 2006 -> 09:24 PM) One of these days Hester is going to recover a kick at the 50 and turn it into a safety. It's funny cause it's true.
  14. QUOTE(danman31 @ Nov 12, 2006 -> 08:52 PM) First upset of the year in the first decent matchup of the year. I thought Zona was overrated. Shakur is absolute garbage, he's so overrated. Zona is definitely overrated, UVA is a pretty solid team however.
  15. QUOTE(Brian @ Nov 12, 2006 -> 04:12 PM) And if it doesn't happen, the system is exploited again. Because it proves that wins earlier in the year are less important than later, and doesn't take into account the quality of the team that you lost to. For example Florida. They lost to Auburn who is 9-2 and just got rolled by a non ranked Georgia team. IMO, If Ohio State loses to Michigan or vice versa in a close game, a re-match is the right thing because the losing team has lost to an undefeated team as their only loss. But like I said, the BCS won't let it happen and it all gives me a headache! We all know the system is flawed and I hate the bcs as much as anyone. I just think at this point if UM loses with a chance to go to the national championship then they should be done, they've lost their shot at the title game. I know that's taking a late season loss more than an early season one but right now I think that's how it should be done.
  16. QUOTE(SnB @ Nov 12, 2006 -> 01:43 PM) if florida wins out, there is no way that they aren't playing for the championship in my book. If Florida and USC both win out I think USC gets in. QUOTE(Brian @ Nov 12, 2006 -> 04:02 PM) I think if Michigan or Ohio State loses by 3 or less, there has to be a re-match on Jan 8th. But the BCS will never have two teams in the same conference in the title game. I disagree. IMO whoever loses should definitely not be in the national championship. This is a play in game for the national championship, everyone knows it and whoever loses had their chance and because of that should not be in the NC imo.
  17. QUOTE(SoxAce @ Nov 12, 2006 -> 02:29 PM) I will just throw this out there. IMO, it will be a HUGE mistake if we trade Cotts unless we got something stellar in return. Agree completely. I don't want Clemens at all to be honest, he'd be an over 4 era pitcher here probably around 4.3. I love the idea of Jamie Walker especially for Ozzie. IMO it'd be a mistake to trade Mark unless we get a can't miss package, Freddy is the one that needs to go imo, Mark's the last starter I want to trade. I'd absolutely love Michael Young and Ozzie loves the guy as well so I wouldn't be surprised if we go after him hard and we match up pretty decently with Texas. I also have no problem with Pierre or Roberts playing left and leading off as long as it's for a decent price.
  18. QUOTE(Brian @ Nov 10, 2006 -> 07:56 PM) Yuck, 23-12, SIU at half. Hope Tatum is back before Orlando. 59 to 28 final. Not as bad as it sounds offensively. Honestly, the offense flowed so much more than last year and there were actually players besides TY who wanted to be aggressive on the offensive side of things. This offense will be a lot better than last season, I'll tell you that right now. Tony Boyle was very impressive tonight, he looks so much more fluid than last. It'll be nice to actually have some depth in the front court this year so Randal and Matt can actually take some breaks. Overall, wasn't the prettiest game but I came out pretty excited about this upcoming season. And before someone says "It was a d3 team," yes I know but you had to see the difference between last year and todays game in terms of aggressiveness in our players. Very nice to see. EDIT: Two other things, the offense only ran a few set plays today, otherwise it was just the motion, we're saving the play usage for real competition I guess. And Tatum is back next sunday against Murray State.
  19. Rowand44

    Films

    QUOTE(Kid Gleason @ Nov 10, 2006 -> 11:19 AM) Oh boy, oh boy, oh boy!!! I am soooooo excited to see this one! Ditto.
  20. QUOTE(Brian @ Nov 9, 2006 -> 07:47 AM) I see a 6'11 recruit for SIU and I smile. Always have lacked legit height. Evans will probably redshirt next season but yes it's nice to see some height come in here. Fay is the real deal, I wouldn't be surprised at all if at some point next season he's starting.
  21. QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ Nov 7, 2006 -> 04:17 PM) To you. Which is all that mattered to you before the season started. I prefer a team that stays competitive over the long haul. That's not to say the Sox won't be competitive without Young, but they'd be in a much better position going forward, and there's no denying that. I believe that a combination of McCarthy + El Duque (with Haeger potentially in the mix) could have given us what Vazquez gave the 2006 White Sox. You apparently don't feel the same way. You're looking at this short sighted bud. It's actually very possible by trading for Vazquez we made ourselves better for the future as well. We'll see what happens with Vaz but at least it looks like he turned some type of corner, hopefully he can be an above average starter next season. But that's not really what I'm talking about when I say that trade could have made us better for the future. There is a pretty decent possibility I'd say that we could get a better package for one of our starters right now than what the DBacks got for Vaz. Obviously we dont know yet what Kenny is going to get back in return but if we could land a package like Milledge and Pelfrey/Humber(not saying we're going to get that but there is a decent shot we can get a package like that) then all the sudden we've landed two elite prospects while giving up one for Vaz. By adding this depth to the rotation, Kenny has made this team better for the present and the future.
×
×
  • Create New...