Balta1701

Is this already Carpenter's worst game of the season?

Time to run away...

Quantity, not quality I say.

Moore was asked the Charity question by Hannity the other night. Yes, I'm posting a clip of a segment from "Hannity".

On a mexican, Who-oa, radio

Cliff Lee may not be better than Halladay, but I think the Phils are happy with how that went.

My Yankee hate has already overwhelmed my Twinkie hate. Kick arse Duensing.

Everybody (Yeah) Rock your body (Yeah)

Anyway, Cleveland would never have traded Cliff Lee within the division.

Well I guess she has swine flu too then I take it?

Said so when they made it.

Quality pitching.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Oct 7, 2009 -> 01:00 PM) Actually I'll bet with the economy the way that it is, we could really see another year of depressed prices on the free agent front. The first guys to sign will probably get money again, but after that, it is going to look a lot like the end of last year, I bet. The question is going to be...who else might have their eyes on the guy who'd be willing to make a serious bid? If we assume we can just write the NL off because of his injury history, we go to the AL. The Yankees and Red Sox, neither one is in serious need of a DH; frankly they probably have too many. Who else could be interested in a LH hitting DH who might have money to spend? I could see LAA getting in on it if they lose Abreu, i could see Texas getting in on that, Tampa Bay might but they have other needs and probably not a lot of money to spend. Lots of teams might be able to use him but not have a whole lot of money to spend (Detroit, Seattle, Oakland, Toronto). Bradley, Abreu, Delgado, Matsui, thome might be other options for some of those teams as well. I'd think if the Sox wanted in, their competition might be LAA and Texas.

No way I can keep up with this thread today

QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Oct 7, 2009 -> 09:25 AM) Question remains when he might be at the big league level? No earlier than September of next year, and that could be pushing it too.

Very much is!

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Oct 7, 2009 -> 11:14 AM) Then that is not the fault of the banks, AS LONG AS the updates are understandable by someone other than a lawyer with too much time on their hands. None of those are ever comprehensible, you knwo that.

Too late.

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Oct 7, 2009 -> 11:00 AM) The bolded is the issue, to me. They almost certainly told him about it in one of tehir many account updates. No one reads through all of those.

You do realize the scale of what we're talking about here right? It's balloned from a couple billion to about $40 billion in fees annually.

Fast typers can find their share of frustration here as well.

So you're ok with banks charging the equivalent of thousands of percent interest on overdrafts? And signing people up for the overdraft program whether they want to or not? Instead of just, you know, having the transaction be declined?

Zip-a-dee-do-dah

Very awesome amusement parks though.

Really out of order there