Kyyle23

QUOTE (PlaySumFnJurny @ Oct 23, 2014 -> 09:42 AM) In a way, I kind of feel bad for her. Not for having to endure all the public scrutiny of her appearance (that's invited and goes with the territory), but how messed up inside does she and the Bruce Jenners, Kenny Rogers, Michael Jacksons, etc., have to be do that to themselves? She seemed to really get messed up when she did the Bridget Jones Diary movies, i remember she had to gain weight and lose it for the role, and she got a lot of scrutiny from it. And really, she kind of fell off the map(in the public eye) after those movies. She made movies through 2009, and nothing until her recent movie where she showed off her new look

QUOTE (Brian @ Oct 23, 2014 -> 08:55 AM) P.S. Thanks i agree with this

QUOTE (ChiSox_Sonix @ Oct 23, 2014 -> 08:22 AM) Hey Kyle, so I don't have to dig through wikipedia, do you mind giving a real quick synopsis of what/who Ultron is? I would say I have a decent knowledge of the Marvel universe but I don't think really anything about Ultron. I'm guessing the one MCU movie I have not seen (IM3) shed some light on it though One of Tony Starks creations that gains sentience( in the movie). In the comics, Hank Pym(ant man) created him

QUOTE (Brian @ Oct 23, 2014 -> 07:06 AM) Yea, thats the one. And with Guardians of the Galaxy entering the picture, it works. because someone has to find him QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Oct 23, 2014 -> 07:28 AM) https://www.yahoo.com/movies/keanu-reeves-i...0673401392.html Keanu Reeves is super bummed Hollywood studios have abandoned him Rights to John Carter sequels expire http://furiousfanboys.com/2014/10/disneys-...lans-new-films/ How about make better movies, Keanu? John Carter right now is about as toxic as Batman was after Batman and Robin came out. You have to wonder who could pull off that set of books, if the Mouse house couldnt pull it off with all that money behind it.

QUOTE (Brian @ Oct 23, 2014 -> 06:47 AM) In the A2 teaser, why are s Hulk fighting, what appears to be, Iron Man?

The first phase of movies was more popcorn and fun entertainment, the second phase changed the game for me, especially Cap 2. To each their own, but if you are looking at it as a bunch of comic movies, you are missing the big picture

Getting chippy in this game! Strickland should stfu, he has given up a lot of homers this postseason

They even had the iconic Ultron book cover pose where he holds and stares into another bots face

Spader is perfect. He sounds unbelievably twisted

QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 22, 2014 -> 07:52 PM) those dang freaking kids..... no respect for old men. yeah, down here they go after the people who download movies. warner bros are leading the charge. That's Marvel/Disney, not Warner Bros

QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 22, 2014 -> 06:47 PM) I stop watching Warner Bros movies. but this look really good. Warner Bros?

The Giants will just eat your soul in this postseason. Damn

QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Oct 22, 2014 -> 05:01 PM) What was it exactly? All I have heard is there was a measure designed to prevent teams from tanking, but I haven't read anything specific

QUOTE (chw42 @ Oct 22, 2014 -> 02:15 PM) What happened to Noah this off-season? Knee surgery. Havent heard anything much more than "cleanup"

QUOTE (greg775 @ Oct 22, 2014 -> 02:07 PM) They are tearing apart Shields on talk radio today in KC. I am right now hearing a media host say, "He has been terrible this postseason. He cannot pitch Game Five." And he's going to get megabucks this offseason? I wish normal life worked that way. His resume is looking questionable rightnow and it will not matter a bit? Wow. No, his postseason resume looks questionable right now. His overall resume looks really good, and you dont seem to want to admit that

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/...ar=0&post=1 Outside of 08(CURSE YOU JAMES), he really hasnt been that good in the postseason. And he has been a drag on bullpens

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Oct 21, 2014 -> 09:49 PM) Sandoval's making himself some bank with this postseason. IIRC Sandoval is pretty much money in every postseason he has participated in. He destroyed Verlander all by himself a few years ago

QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Oct 21, 2014 -> 07:20 PM) Time to revoke the Big Game James nickname. Maybe it is "Pitching in"Big Game James as opposed to "having a"Big Game James. Because he does pitch in a lot of big games.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Oct 21, 2014 -> 02:29 PM) (would they eventually work their way up to a ban if they were caught like 9 times?) that would be a hilarious test case.

QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 21, 2014 -> 02:22 PM) now i got you thinking, take the rose example out of this discussion. we are discussing cheating. whether it is scuffing the ball and going to all length to hide it and some one on PED and going to all length of hiding it. it is still cheating. No, you got me disagreeing that they are similar situations, because they are not. Betting on baseball isnt necessarily cheating, but it could be. Regardless, it is a banishment level offense, and everyone in the game knows this. If you are gambling, then you could be throwing games in order to win money, this is something that is controllable by the gambler, ESPECIALLY someone like Rose who was managing the game. Taking a steroid or scuffing a ball to win a game is increasing your chances, but you arent in total control of the outcome, a hitter can still get you, a pitcher can still strike you out. And banning someone for scuffing a ball is just silly.

QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 21, 2014 -> 02:17 PM) different level of cheating. how can 1 come up with an excuse for 1 example of a cheat and let the others go by. it has to be 1 penalty. plain and simple. there is no degrees of interpretation. So you think a guy who scuffed a ball in order to get a little more movement on his curve should be assessed the same penalty as a guy who very clearly could have thrown games by intentionally mismanaging them in order to win a wager?

QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 21, 2014 -> 02:06 PM) no there is line of judgment in this. the point is, this pitcher is cheating and going to great length to cheat. so what is the difference between this pitcher and those with the PED not with Rose and his banned for life. did the pitcher bet on the game that he plays(and coaches)? Because that is quite a difference edit: I think i read your comparison right. But now im not sure. Either way I have no idea how Rose is in this equation

QUOTE (Y2HH @ Oct 21, 2014 -> 01:20 PM) That's exactly why I don't think it matters. I can't write my name on those properly anyway...and the companies have to know that almost nobody can, so the signatures won't match either way. So my response to these signatures is stop wasting my time with signatures...this isn't 1975. Chip/pin is necessary today, signatures are NOT a valid form of security, nor were they ever. Lets just say it has its uses, and leave it at that.

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Oct 21, 2014 -> 01:09 PM) A lot of the older e-sign devices don't even work anymore. All you can do is scribble a big blob because the screen is so worn out. yea a lot of them are totally worthless that way, or they are new and hypersensitive

QUOTE (Y2HH @ Oct 21, 2014 -> 12:58 PM) Haha, this is funny, I haven't signed my name correctly in about 5 years now. I literally put 2 squiggly lines and have yet to have anyone say anything or have a credit card company call about it. We wouldnt say anything unless your card was physically stolen and used. At that point, it becomes not funny.