Felix

I'm going to cry... and not tears of happiness.

QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Jun 14, 2006 -> 01:41 AM) Matt Antonelli is also a 3rd baseman, and could be ready in a season or 2. Can't he play just about any infield position though, or am I confusing him with someone else?

QUOTE(Buehrle>Wood @ Jun 14, 2006 -> 02:37 PM) Hangar, do you care what kind of undershirt Ozzie Guillen wears during Sox games? Chicago Fire jersey? QUOTE(WCSox @ Jun 14, 2006 -> 02:38 PM) Only the Tribune would write something that stupid. It's a f***ing phone... and there's already a land line from the dugout to the bullpen. One uses wires and the other doesn't. Big f***ing deal. And its fine that you feel that way, but its still a story because its the first time it was done by a team.

QUOTE(Hangar18 @ Jun 14, 2006 -> 02:33 PM) its a CELL PHONE, theres nothing new about it Its new to the ballpark though, and thats what they are getting at. Teams don't use cell phone to call the bullpen.. they never have. Since the Cubs did it for the first time, its going to be considered 'revolutionary technology', which is what the article refers to it as.

QUOTE(Steff @ Jun 14, 2006 -> 02:17 PM) And we're off.... Notice how its about the Cubs and not the White Sox. Obviously its being bias.

QUOTE(Hangar18 @ Jun 14, 2006 -> 02:12 PM) Excellent post by the way Felix .......... I feel as if I'm missing some sarcasm here.. Right now, dugouts have the phone with the wire. As far as I know, there isn't a single dugout otherwise. Using cell phones instead would make these wired phones useless, and would make it easier for the managers to keep in touch with the bullpen.

QUOTE(Hangar18 @ Jun 14, 2006 -> 02:04 PM) Supposedly, this "cell phone" is going to revolutionize the way managers talk to their bullpen coaches/players. That actually would be something new, and would be breakthrough technology for baseball..

QUOTE(Cuck the Fubs @ Jun 10, 2006 -> 02:01 AM) The Cubs unfortuantly hung on. Who are you rooting for this weekend in the Cubs/Tigers series?

QUOTE(BDavisFutureHOF @ Jun 14, 2006 -> 12:07 PM) If this is "mediocre" then I do not know why we signed Judy to the contract that we just signed him to. Does anyone know why? It was a horrible deal to give Garland..

Wow..

QUOTE(Hangar18 @ Jun 14, 2006 -> 10:49 AM) Chicago NewsMedia Watch 6/14/06 The SOX win a nice game last nite, with the big story being the performance of the bullpen last nite. The SOX unfortuneately lose ground to the 4th Place Cubs and are now behind by 100 stories. Despite Winning the World Series in 2005, the White Sox find themselves INEXPLICABLY getting less attention from our 2 major Chicago newspapers, who somehow believe that the 5th Place cubs are worthy of more news coverage than a team that just won the World Series in 2005 AND are currently in 2nd place with one of the top records in baseball. Chicago Tribune: 4 cub stories 3 sox stories Chicago SunTimes: 7 cub stories 3 sox stories Standings as of Wednesday June 14th, 2006 Priviledged, Media Owned, Media Favored, 4th place in 2005 Cubs 578 Underdog, Media Maligned, Media Ignored, WS Champs in 2005 Sox 478

not to help you or anything, but the Cubs are in 5th place, not 4th (you have both mentioned in your post?)

QUOTE(jackie hayes @ Jun 14, 2006 -> 10:32 AM) Dibs . Wrong link This one is better

If you can't root for the Cubs to beat the Tigers this weekend, then you need to get your priorities straight.

Lets go Cubs

Brian, What do you think you can offer to make yourself stand out to the White Sox in the future?

QUOTE(Benchwarmerjim @ Jun 13, 2006 -> 08:10 PM) less talking heads. So I take it you aren't a David Byrne fan?

Nice job for Bobby there

Nice inning for BMac

nice job Neal

f*** you Jon. this always happens

stop this Garland..

Crede

Thanks guys