Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

southsider2k5

Admin
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by southsider2k5

  1. southsider2k5 replied to southsider2k5's topic in SLaM
    Bingo. Anyone work at the Trump? Clue #5: Leaving work early? You might hear your boss say 'you're fired'! #csnhunt
  2. QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Apr 15, 2011 -> 03:18 PM) No the entire point of a trial is that everyone is going to lie and its up to the judge or jury to determine who is telling the truth. Im not sure how the legal system falls apart if people are lying under oath. The legal system presumes that everyone is lying, and therefore it is up to the attorney to show why the other person is lying and why his client is telling the truth. One of the first things you are taught in trial advocacy is how to catch someone in a lie to discredit their testimony. Im not cool with people lying under oath, I think that it should be fair for everyone. If the govt is going to lie under oath, then the person they are trying to convict, should also be able to lie under oath. But right now we have a system where the govt can lie under oath, without penalty, where as if a Defendant lies under oath, the govt will try and prosecute. Thats unjust. As for Bonds, you have a right to not self incriminate. A grand jury is part of a criminal proceeding. While he was not the focus of the proceeding (he was given immunity which is why he couldnt use the 5th), it was still a criminal procedure. And Im not sure how this is arguing that because everyone is doing it. Its arguing that, if the govt is allowed to perjure to convict people, than defendants should be allowed to perjure to try and beat the govt, its called fairness. Or if you are going to convict defendants for perjury, convict every officer who perjures. there is a big difference between a persons version of the truth, and lying under oath. I don't care who commits perjury, they should be tried and convicted.
  3. southsider2k5 replied to southsider2k5's topic in SLaM
    QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Apr 15, 2011 -> 03:34 PM) The Hotel was Hilton Chicago (I believe). It could be the Hilton but in the rest of the times, they make it a pretty famous and/or iconic building.
  4. southsider2k5 replied to southsider2k5's topic in SLaM
    QUOTE (knightni @ Apr 15, 2011 -> 02:47 PM) The IBM building is on Wabash, so is Willis Tower. The Sears Tower is bordered by Wacker, Franklin, Jackson, and Adams.
  5. southsider2k5 replied to southsider2k5's topic in SLaM
    I'll bet the fifth clue has something in it that refers to playing a "trump card".
  6. southsider2k5 replied to southsider2k5's topic in SLaM
    QUOTE (knightni @ Apr 15, 2011 -> 02:47 PM) The IBM building is on Wabash Trump tower is right along Wabash too.
  7. southsider2k5 replied to southsider2k5's topic in SLaM
    I think you might be right Clue #4: You’ll have to go to great heights for this #CSNHunt
  8. southsider2k5 replied to dasox24's topic in SLaM
    First things first, you need to form an exploratory committee and begin fundraising...
  9. QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Apr 15, 2011 -> 01:51 PM) make that 1.5 hours for MB starts And three for when Edwin starts.
  10. QUOTE (chw42 @ Apr 15, 2011 -> 01:48 PM) Twins probably shouldn't have traded Ramos (especially for freakin' Matt Capps). If they were to move Mauer out of the C position, his immediate replacement would be the great .200 hitting Drew Butera. The Twins would never trade a top prospect for a reliever! Only kenny would do that!
  11. QUOTE (danman31 @ Apr 15, 2011 -> 01:36 PM) Wow I never thought about that. He should have another year still because he was signed before he was 18, giving the Sox 5 years of 'evaluation time.' I'm fairly sure he's only on year 4 because the DSL doesn't count, but I'm gonna have to follow up on this. That said, talent or otherwise, I can't imagine a team wanting to hold him on a 25-man roster next year. With the start he's off to now, I could see him landing on the 40-man roster before 2013. At that point he could have AA time or be heading into a AA season so the Sox would probably want to protect him. That's what I was wondering about. If the kid has a big enough year at his age, could someone take a chance on him? Could he force to put him on the 40 with a big enough season? But if he has another year, that is all for naught.
  12. That's about as many people as went to their last home game...
  13. QUOTE (danman31 @ Apr 15, 2011 -> 01:18 PM) And showing massive power. It's almost become cliche, but he has always been worth following because of the age. Will he be to Rule 5 stage after this year?
  14. southsider2k5 posted a topic in SLaM
    Anyone else following it? Seems like it should be a theatre on Wabash, but i can't figure it out. CSN Hunt #7: Signed Blackhawks stick, signed calendar Thursday, April 14, 2011 Want to win a stick signed by the entire Blackhawks team AND a CSN prize pack that includes a CSN calendar signed by Derrick Rose, Patrick Sharp, Ryan Dempster, Mark Buehrle and more? How to WIN: 1. Follow @CSNChicago on Twitter on Friday, April 15 2. We'll post five clues (with the first clue at 10:00 a.m.) about the location of the prize that will be somewhere in the city of Chicago 3. After the 5th clue, find the location, spot the CSN representative and tell them the name of CSN's Blackhawks analyst to win! 4. Official Rules CLUES 10:05 a.m. Clue #1: The #NHL has its 3 stars of the game, you'll need more for today's #CSNHunt location 11:28 a.m. Clue #2: The Caped Crusader has been caught on camera at this #CSNHunt location 1:01 p.m. Clue #3: Don’t bash us if you aren't able to find this #CSNHunt location
  15. QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Apr 15, 2011 -> 12:17 PM) Who is going to prosecute the police officer? The prosecutor who just won his case because the police officer perjured? The problem is that perjury and obstruction of justice are weapons that the govt uses to coerce people to do things. They are unfortunately not weapons that every day people like us, can use against the govt. If the govt commits perjury, your best hope is that you are found innocent. http://www.constitution.org/lrev/dershowitz_test_981201.htm To sum up the Bonds trial, using Dershowitz's words: Sorry for the long post, but the reality is that there is a pretty good chance that there were perjured statements used against Bonds, but those people will never be prosecuted. Why? Because the govt gets to choose who they prosecute. They dont prosecute people who play their game and who give them what they want, regardless if it is completely false and leads to the death of an innocent defendant. Conversely, if you dont give the govt what they want, they will try and ruin your life with a perjury conviction. That is why people should be repulsed by what is being done to Bonds, because its a sham. This is type of argument that never will change my mind. Pointing out other faults is never going to change my mind about something unrelated. Just because our system is corrupt, doesn't mean Barry Bonds shouldn't be prosecuted. It means Barry Bonds AND anyone who purjuors themselves should be prosecuted. Just because one person gets away with cheating, doesn't mean everyone is now allowed to cheat. If there is no penalty for lying in court, there might as well not be a court system.
  16. http://www.scottwinship.com/1/post/2011/04...inequality.html
  17. QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Apr 15, 2011 -> 11:54 AM) He's really fallen off lately. Ended last season poorly in B-Ham, looked pretty bad in ST this year. A major injury would explain a lot of that unfortunately...
  18. QUOTE (Benchwarmerjim @ Apr 15, 2011 -> 10:59 AM) Pavano told Gardy he was gassed after 8 innings There is more to that post than meets the eye. There was a long drawn out fight over Buehrle and Danks getting pulled too early, and many feeling that Ozzie was an idiot for doing it.
  19. QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Apr 15, 2011 -> 11:31 AM) And the Defense is going to appeal the conviction the govt got him on. I just dont understand why are willing to support the govt wasting millions of dollars on something that happens every day, and something that govt employees do every day. Plenty of police officers/fbi/dea etc, have perjured to get a conviction. The entire point of a trial is that people lie and its up to the jury to determine who isnt the liar. Ive had a judge flat out call some one a liar and say "You are lying to my face", but all it meant was that they lost the trial. Its a shame, but this is what happens when you dont rat on your friends, the govt punishes you. I dont support vindictiveness in the law, I think that goes beyond justice. See now I see that as a major problem, and something that should be fixed too.
  20. QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Apr 15, 2011 -> 09:53 AM) Is it really bad luck when Mauer gets hurt? Yeah, they have some guys on that team that surprise no one when they go down... Mauer, Morneau, Liriano etc. They have a whole lot of money wrapped up in two of them. I wouldn't be shocked if they really, really regret both of the M-boys extentions.
  21. QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Apr 15, 2011 -> 09:55 AM) It'd be so, so, so nice if one could actually save money by being able to just purchase the channels or small groups of channels that one actually wants. If a company wanted to steal marketshare quickly, they could offer ala carte cable. I would jump on it so hard.
  22. QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Apr 15, 2011 -> 09:43 AM) Pulling out your penis in front of an adult is a sex offense as well. To be fair, you were totally asking for it the way you were dressed...
  23. QUOTE (knightni @ Apr 14, 2011 -> 08:55 PM) Ha, ha, Knight could be Wite's Daddy

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.