southsider2k5

Brando and FSJ This site has the BEST episode summaries I have ever seen for the Simpsons, complete with so much info it almost makes you sick. Simpsons Episode History

Drew Carey Show- Cleveland OH The Simpsons-Springfield (umm, uhhh) SouthPark-Colorado

Believe me, I am not commenting on how well the money was spent. I just hate it when people have bad information they are using as fact. For all of the people who are complaining that they payroll has not gone up, here it is in black and white 2003 White Sox payroll= $51 million 2004 White Sox payroll as of Soxfest =$64million

I hope that JR dumps MVP. f*** them for hiring the worst newspaper columnist in sports. Besides how stupid is it of MVP to hiring someone that trashes the biggest product that they have to sell? That's like me advertising for a competing firm on my work computer, and then wondering why they want to fire me. And I can't leave this without :fyou Kotex-Boy.

The payroll is up $13 million dollars over this time last year. That is a higher percentage increase, than the increase in the number of fans of 2003vs2002.

Yeah, that isn't Baj. he is Man_Hands... Maggsmaggs is someone else.

baahahhahahahahahahahahahaha Sorry I have to laugh while I can.

Umm I am sure that you remember "irrational exuberance" don't you? He trashed the overvaluations of the stock markets repeatedly as the tech bubble grew out of control in 99-00. He has made plenty of public statements over the years that disagreed with important tenants of Presidental platforms.

Hypothetical question. Suppose you find out one of the lock HOFers playing right now, was on steroids, granted with the hatred of Sammy and Barry around here, I know what people would say, BUT hypothetically speaking-You found out Frank Thomas was on steroids, would that change your mind on a Hall of Fame vote?

Don't kid yourself with that Howard Dean-speak. Greenspan isn't politically motivated. The Bush's hated him for a long time for what they believed was his inaction that prolonged the 90-91 recession. Greenspan has also been a vocal opponent of the spending habits of this particular congress, which is republican dominated. He also was very clear on supporting the tax cuts only with the contingency that spending be accordingly cut. And that is off the top of my head. I know the guy is no ones puppet.

Merged...

One of the highlights of today's testimony is that Alan thinks the tax cuts should be made permanent and we should instead look at spending cuts. http://www.reuters.com/financeNewsArticle....storyID=4347576

This is going to be the most incredible baseball game ever.

Say it aint so http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/02/12/offbeat.b...p.ap/index.html

The price of sugar has trended way down... And would be a lot less if a powerful Washington PAC hadn't pigeonholed congress into keeping a bunch of unnecesary subsidies into the tiny US sugar market.... But then again this discussion wasn't about sugar was it?

I totally agree with you. If the MLB got a 5-7% positive rate, after telling players this was coming AND not testing for the designer drugs, I would bet that the 30% figure quoted by Ken Caminitti years back isn't too far away from being true.

Honestly the physical play is one of my personal favorite parts of the game. Not just the fighting, but the checking, the shot blocking, and things like that are just awesome to watch.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4246377/

No but Wyoming is part of the union.

That's right William Hung has an internet site She Bangs!

I thought that $40 voicemail charge on my bill was a little high...

After 8 years of Clinton, no one cares. This will be a nonissue.

The problem is that is cannot go on indefinately because the productivity of such work cannot be sustained. People breakdown, feel they are underpaid, pout, find higher paying work that pays them what they are due, etc. I am sure much of the short term productivity gains are due to that, but long term technology is the pusher of gains. More and more companies are turning to machines, computers, robots, etc to do human jobs. Those productivity gains are constant and sustainable, putting twice as much work on a human isn't.

Honestly I think they need to ditch the instigator rule, and allow the fighting to take care of business legimately, instead of through cheap shots. That way justice is fair instead of injuring people.

According to Greeny it is the rises in productivity outpacing production, making it unnecesary for hiring to take place. According to me, the focus on stock price has led to hiring to be less and less of an investment priority because you want to keep costs as low and flexible as possible to keep good earnings reports flowing out. I wish one of these pretencious assholes would ask Greenspan an intelligent question like my theory so that I could hear what he thinks, instead of putting on a show for their constituents. You have the premier economic mind of the 20th century sitting and answering questions, and they are too busy trying to trash/reelect Bush to ask an insightful question.