-
Posts
60,748 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
14
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Texsox
-
QUOTE (bmags @ Dec 4, 2012 -> 04:10 PM) And yet, I find that much less concerning than black teenagers getting killed because they are automatically viewed as a threat. Maybe teenagers will stop loitering and looking threatening. Go find another place to hangout away from the public.
-
QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Dec 4, 2012 -> 03:45 PM) Your dismissal of them doing that crap doesn't help either. At this point those people are rabble-rousers and nothing more. I remember when I was in high school 6-7 black kids went to a high school football game and started a brawl in Decatur. The school expelled them (as they should have). Jackson went down with his coalition, screaming racism and injustice. It shut the school down for a few days, became a huge thing, and he bullied the school into putting the kids into alternative school instead. They were a bunch of dickheads that deserved to be expelled, but they were black so the punishment was immediately too harsh and wrong. That was my first exposure to Jackson being the problem with racism, not the solution. Perhaps they should have been expelled, that could be debated for reasons below. However, everyone I hope agrees that they should have received the same punishment that anyone else, regardless of race, would have received in that situation. Expulsion should be the last resort. Expulsion is problematic because the kids are then enriolled in a new school district. It becomes a nice way for districts to move their problems to surrounding communties. The problem is in too many places black kids start brawls and white kids had a little fight. Black gets are expelled, white kids receive detention. Black kids are trouble makers, white kids were in the wrong place at the wrong time. Equal transgressions should receive equal punishments. So either start cranking up the penalties for white kids or crank them down for everyone else.
-
Done with one class. Nice to start my grad career with an A. Turning in another seminar paper tomorrow and this semester is in the books. 12 more days of teaching and then a two week vacation. I need it.
-
I'd rather cheer for him in the NL, but he would look good in pinstripes. All he has to do is f*** with a Red Sox player early and the NY fans will fall in love with him.
-
2013 HOF ballot out, includes Sosa, Clemens, Bonds
Texsox replied to southsider2k5's topic in The Diamond Club
As anti as I am about them getting in, I would like to see a display of the steroid era or even expanded to notorious players. Don't ignore it, acknowledge it. Mention the players and their accomplishments. It would be an exhibit, but the players would not be HoF members. Would the pro Rose and Bond find that acceptable? -
http://www.houstontexans.com/tv-media/phot...18-981add75062e Gave 12 kids 80 seconds to fill their carts at Toys -R- Us Isn't he the same guy who was sued by his ex-wife for child support?
-
2013 HOF ballot out, includes Sosa, Clemens, Bonds
Texsox replied to southsider2k5's topic in The Diamond Club
QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Dec 4, 2012 -> 08:07 AM) He won 3 MVP awards without them. Or at least without the really good PEDs he got from Balco. Which kind of makes it worse, doesn't it? -
2013 HOF ballot out, includes Sosa, Clemens, Bonds
Texsox replied to southsider2k5's topic in The Diamond Club
QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 4, 2012 -> 08:00 AM) Rose broke the cardinal rule of baseball, knowing what the consequences were. I have no pity for Pete Rose. I have none either. On the slippery slope of letting in people who disgraced the sport, he's the first I would. You do make an excellent point that he fully, without any equivocation, knew the consequences. -
QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Dec 4, 2012 -> 08:29 AM) Then he'd be lying, because he knows that if AJ is brought back, it's to be the starter. Doesn't that say something about how he compares his skills to AJs? I like him saying he wants to play, I am trying to figure out what it means when he thinks he can only be the starter if another (better in his mind?) player isn't there.
-
2013 HOF ballot out, includes Sosa, Clemens, Bonds
Texsox replied to southsider2k5's topic in The Diamond Club
I was thinking, between Rose and Bonds, I believe Rose deserves it more. His hits were all legit, and he would be going in as a player. I still would rather see them both out, but if one was to get in, I prefer Rose. Who knows what Bonds would have done without PEDs? -
How's this for a better quote "I expect to be the starting catcher for the White Sox next season. What the club does with AJ won't change that."
-
What does it tell you that Flowers doesn't think he can start if AJ is there? I love the idea he wants to start, I'd rather he be thinking that he's better than AJ and would be starting even if AJ returns.
-
2013 HOF ballot out, includes Sosa, Clemens, Bonds
Texsox replied to southsider2k5's topic in The Diamond Club
Could any of these be bought legally without a prescription? If the players thought it was ok, why didn't any player piublically say "I'm bigger because I'm taking X? They knew it was wrong. -
2013 HOF ballot out, includes Sosa, Clemens, Bonds
Texsox replied to southsider2k5's topic in The Diamond Club
It seems to me that if you disgrace an organization by cheating or attacking the credibility of the competition you probably are not someone who should be held in high esteem by that organization. To hold up Bonds or Rose and say "these are the greatest individuals in baseball history and MLB is proud of their accomplishments" would be a joke. Baseball was made worse by their accomplishments and actions, they should not be honored. Plus they lied and lied until finally the evidence was too much or they needed to make a deal. Not the kind of people baseball should be honoring. If MLB started with Rose and Bonds, it never would have survived. -
QUOTE (Jake @ Dec 2, 2012 -> 10:26 AM) Yeah hard for me to say whether it is that or not -- but it is not adequate to simply cast him off as "murderer" to me unless more evidence to the contrary comes out. My sense is that you don't do that unless you're mentally unhealthy. I'm not about to pin his number on my chest or something, but I don't think our society is programmed to fully understand what went down. It sounds to me like he just went crazy and unfortunately took someone with him to the other side. I will be interested in what further details come out. Jake, I too will "wait and see" but he is a murderer in my mind until something turns up to dispute that. The facts as we know them today are he killed her.
-
The level of empathy humans show towards each other is one of the areas where humans are different than other animals. And sometimes not. While I try not to cry over something, or someone, that won't cry over me, some situations call for a small level of empathy. We may forget that each of us is a son or daughter, perhaps a brother, sister, niece, nephew, husband, wife, friend, or teammate. Some of all of them will grieve at your passing no matter what you do or to whom. Even if you want to be the cold hearted sort, his wife was probably liked by a lot of players and their spouses. For any and all of those reasons, it could have been a very rational decision to postpone the game. But there are some very practical concerns which make postponing difficult. However, games have been rescheduled for storms, infrastructure problems, acts of war, and I'm certain a few other issues.
-
I believe something along these lines would be nice Domestic violence struck the Chiefs family yesterday. At this time we would like to have a moment of silence to remember all the families around the world that are affected by domestic violence.
-
QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Dec 1, 2012 -> 12:44 PM) Bet against the Chiefs. Seriously though, every single player on that team has to be contemplating suicide each week. I have respect for them for not taking the easy way out. Wow. I sincerely hope you didn't mean for this to sound as terrible as it does. wow smh
-
I have always been uncomfortable with taxing any inheritance. For that matter, I don't like taxing the same money twice. I know that no one went broke paying taxes on profits, but I still find a certain unfairness after I have paid my income tax to then pay taxes on profits from the investments made with my post income tax dollars. I wish I had a better plan to propose.
-
QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Dec 1, 2012 -> 09:36 AM) The problem you're over-looking is that retaining AJ will also be a downgrade at the position. The guy just had a career year as a 35 year old catcher and will not come close to those numbers next year. No matter who we go with, we'll be getting less production at catcher than we did this past season. I wasn't overlooking AJ's age. I agree he will most likely drop off (how many said that a year ago and were very wrong). We probably disagree how far he will drop off. I'm not certain what you mean by "not come close". Are you thinking his .278 avg to .225? Slugging from .501 to .300? A 15% drop? 50% drop? Adam Dunn 2011 drop?
-
QUOTE (YASNY @ Dec 1, 2012 -> 11:52 AM) What happened to Phil Humber is that he went back to being Phil Humber. No matter where you go, there you are.
-
It seems that what happens with AJ will be a nice indication of JRs and K-Dubs "gut" on the chances for next season. If they believe a playoff shot is less than 50-50, seriously why spend money on AJ? I don't believe they can backslide too much here and remain competitive. I also do not see a no AJ scenario where it would not be a backslide and the chances of Flowers being an upgrade are rather slim IMHO.
-
QUOTE (lostfan @ Nov 29, 2012 -> 10:25 PM) This had more to do with the priorities of the administration than it did with Powell. Billions and billions for the DoD but the State Department was an afterthought, and they'd even have the military doing stuff State should've been doing. That didn't change until some time well into Bush's second term (by which time Rice was SoS). Remember the surge and Rumsfeld leaving, Gates coming on, and the military doing a complete change in strategy after the administration admitted (through actions, not verbally) it didn't know what the f*** it was doing? Something like that. It all kinda happened at the same time. That wasn't Powell's fault, it was Bush's security team of neocons and loons who had no business in positions of power. I think your military perspective adds extra validity to your points.
-
QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Nov 27, 2012 -> 09:17 AM) Sold out his entire career? Where do you get this stuff? Powell was the one guy in the close circle with Bush who tried, repeatedly, to talk him and the others out of going into Iraq. He questioned it from multiple viewpoints, and tried to sell his reasoning to Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and others... to no avail. The policy direction was set, and he could not control that. So, he was given partial charge of getting the intelligence associated with Iraq's bad intentions. He shot down multiple of these as well, and was even accused of hiding some of it from the administration. Finally, when that frat boy who was running CIA had what he called the evidence that was needed, Powell pressed him hard. Frat boy gave the now-infamous "slam dunk" response - the head of the CIA said the evidence was a slam dunk. Powell, at this point, was STILL skeptical, but knew he had a job to do. So he said, fine, I'll show this stuff to the UN and the world... but you, CIA guy, are going to stand right be-f***ing-side me while I do it. If I go down for this, you are coming with me. Now... tell me how, that person, instead of the dozens of others who feverishly pushed the war machine into Iraq, is somehow responsible for starting the war in Iraq. And tell me how he sold out, when he clearly tried every avenue available, and still had a job to do. Powell is the guy LEAST responsible for any of that s***. And his performance during it, is exactly why I think he'd made an excellent SecDef for Obama. Wish I wrote this.
-
QUOTE (YASNY @ Nov 26, 2012 -> 01:44 AM) If Ozzie's done, he's done because of Ozzie. I am the first one to say that managers receive too much credit and too much blame. But the bottom line is exactly what YASNY is saying, Ozzie is done because he just has not done a good job in five or six years. His teams are a mess. They consistently under-perform. On top of that he is an embarrassment to organizations. I like the guy and really hope he gets a job in the broadcast booth. I think he would become a great color guy in the right situation. I also think after a couple years in the booth, a little mellowing, a lot of maturing, he could come back and win another WS with the right team. But right now, he's poison and will not be getting a job in a dugout. I just don't know how anyone can look at the past few seasons as a whole and not agree his teams are under-performing, lack chemistry, and he's a nightmare for PR.
