flavum

Don't worry. Rios is going to hit a 3-run homer next inning.

Classic Buehrle.

According to gameday, Pierre got credit for a sacrifice. Is that possible when there was already one out? Was he bunting for a hit?

ABC cancelled Flashforward, Better Off Ted, and Scrubs...and that Alyssa Milano show.

Doyle mowing them down at Kannapolis again. He may be in line for a promotion.

Huddy done after 6 shutout innings. 88 pitches. I guess it depends how the Sox do the next few weeks, but if the season is over, there's no reason to keep Freddy, and there is every reason to bring Hudson up by the break.

Short 2-3, .409. He has 65 hits in 34 games.

They're real. She was born Katy Hudson...here she is at 16. Huge rack. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pLvWjountA

It's Chris Getz's fault.

Short 4-6. WTF? This guy is on fire.

Short 3-4, double, .403...damn.

Short 2-3. .399

Unless Quentin turns it around in a big way, I don't want him in the Sox plans for 2011. He's a one-year wonder.

Large win. A win tomorrow may light the spark they need, and it wouldn't hurt if the Twins got cold for a couple weeks.

Stanton was 3-4 for Jax. I'm glad the Sox are facing the Marlins next weekend, and not in June. He may be up by then.

That's got to be Marquez's best game in the Sox org. Good for him. This Brandon Short, wow. 4-5. Hitting .393.

Span CF, Hudson 2B, Mauer C, Morneau 1B, Cuddyer RF, Kubel DH, Young LF, Harris SS, Punto 3B Hardy put on the DL.

Ok, fair enough. Let's give them more time. To me, the math has already caught up to them. We'll see if they can get hot, or if the Twins and Tigers turn into bad teams.

I guess we have different opinions of this team. I don't think they lose games because they're unlucky; they lose because they're bad. The bullpen has moments of brilliance, but they've also had moments of being horrible--including Thornton, who is probably the best lefty reliever in baseball. They don't hit in the clutch. Their OBP is awful. The defense has been bad. Winning teams win, and losing teams lose. That's how it goes. If they want to start winning now, and in bulk, great. I won't be holding my breath. And I'm sorry, 13-19 is a TON worse than 16-16 at this point in the season. That's why those tough losses are tough...because they stay in the standings all year long. They don't leave the loss column.

Shack-- There's a huge difference between 13-19 and 16-16. I hate to break that to you, but there is. Just do this...assume the Sox are out of it until they get to .500. When they get there, then see how many games out they are, and go from there. Until they get to .500, there's no point in being Mr. Positive.

Danks is starting tomorrow, isn't he? I wanted Danks and Buehrle this series.

I thought the Sox would want to load up on lefties against the Twins. I thought that made more sense. Now Floyd and Peavy will be starting a week between starts. In my opinion, you keep your top 4 on schedule, and push your 5th starter back.

So a guy that played 2/3 of a baseball season that hit .270, 14 homers, 28 doubles, and knocked in 63....and learned a new position at the major league level and did well, was rushed to the majors? Uh, no. This is just a slump. A slump that a lot of second year players go through (Coghlan). He will get through it, and be fine. I have no doubt about that. Could Beckham be sent down for a short time to get his swing back? Sure, that may be the right thing to do for him. But he should not be sent down for the rest of the year, and he wasn't "rushed".

Phillies get 84 home games, and Halladay misses out on a Toronto return. Life in 2010... http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20...sp&c_id=phi

I'd like to know the percentage of teams that are 6 games under or worse after 32 games, that actually get to over .500 sometime that same season.