Everything posted by Flash Tizzle
-
White Sox vs. A's, 4/11/07 (W)
Jesus Christ Dye is SLLLOOOOWWWW.
-
White Sox vs. A's, 4/11/07 (W)
I suggest for any moderators reading this thread to officially add Podsednik's gaffe from yesterday as an emotion. It deserves to be immortalized. And Thome up with no one on. This hasn't happened many times this season /sarcasm.
-
White Sox vs. A's, 4/11/07 (W)
Leadoff walk for
-
White Sox vs. A's, 4/11/07 (W)
QUOTE(Wedge @ Apr 11, 2007 -> 03:34 PM) Maybe we can work the pitch count on this Ace pitcher You're completely undervaluing Kennedy. You see, atleast he has good control...... What? Well, what about good stuff? No that either? Well, he's deceptive, right? Oh, yeah, just another scrub pitcher who embarrasses our VAUNTED lineup. This is why we can't touch Santana. We can't even beat the Kennedy's of the world.
-
White Sox vs. A's, 4/11/07 (W)
- Sox Loss Postgame Thread
QUOTE(fathom @ Apr 11, 2007 -> 02:12 AM) Couldn't agree more. Between his hip issue last year, and his tightness during ST, Jenks doesn't seem to get the same extension and follow-thru on his pitches. He's basically an offspeed pitcher right now with a fastball that he tries to throw for strikes and set the hitter up. If MacDougal has to become the closer, then we put inexperienced guys like Aardsma or Masset into the set-up spot. Let's just hope that Jenks isn't this year's Shingo/Politte, etc. Let's hypothesize here that Jenks doesn't regain lost velocity and sits around 93-94mph. Even with such a fastball, Jenks has quality offspeed pitches within his arsenal. His cutter isn't half bad, either. If he showcases the changeup seen in the Indians series, his production should easily exceed that of Shingo and Politte. I'm not happy about the prospect of a declining Jenks, but we have two major league capable closers already in the bullpen. Jenks at ~4.25ERA still isn't terrible if other relievers hold their own and fill in during the 9th inning.- Sox Loss Postgame Thread
QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Apr 11, 2007 -> 01:41 AM) There you go, OG is blind. I suppose this leaves Anderson as someone destined to have no more than 150 AB's. If he considers Podsednik's defense this first week as "good," then it'll take 5 months for doubt to creep into his mind. Erstad such as hell isn't going anywhere, and Ozuna is a "Muela" -- Spanish translation of 'grinder.'- Sox Loss Postgame Thread
QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Apr 11, 2007 -> 01:21 AM) I don't know. We seem to second guess everything he does, or doesn't do, so maybe to him, it's regular not to make defensive replacements, or make bullpen changes too often, etc. What we never seem to find out is why Ozzie does what he does. Not everything he does -- only the painfully obvious decisions which somehow, for some reason, are overlooked.- White Sox vs. A's, 4/11/07 (W)
Don't make me include this in my signature again, Buehrle: ( + ) x / =- Starting Pitching
QUOTE(fathom @ Apr 11, 2007 -> 01:07 AM) We've faced two bad offensive teams now in Minnesota and Oakland. I'm not so sure that the pitching can keep it up though with Indians and Rangers coming up. I'm actually a bit apprehensive about facing Cleveland and Texas. More than usual. Are we watching the pitching staff reach their full potential, or merely exploit weak offensive ballclubs? Even without a radar reading (which mysteriously wasn't present until MacDougal), Garland appeared to get away with a lot of pitches. The umpires calling high strikes benefited him immensely. And Buehrle wasn't exactly cruising when Garko's line drive hit him last week.....- Sox Loss Postgame Thread
QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Apr 11, 2007 -> 01:06 AM) Someone just called in from the site. What was the question from the caller and PFB's response?- Starting Pitching
QUOTE(beautox @ Apr 11, 2007 -> 01:00 AM) even with jenks let down tonight his velocity will come back, i have faith, he started out last season like that and has gone on record a few times stating thats just the way it works out for him. Next season, if Jenks arm is still attached, I want him to either begin Spring Training several weeks earlier or not have a guaranteed position as closer entering April. By then, who knows, he may not have such confidence out of Guillen. What I do know is waiting several weeks for velocity to return shouldn't be an issue every.....damn....year. Especially from our supposed closer. Either he gains strength entering the season or becomes a middle inning reliever until the fastball sits around 96-98.- White Sox vs. A's , 4/10/07 (L)
QUOTE(Wanne @ Apr 11, 2007 -> 12:26 AM) I just saw another replay. It DID NOT hit the wall first. Right off the dome. CLTV showed the replay as well. The baseball did not deflect off the wall first, or at all. And Caulfield, I've like your posts this far -- but this is where you look like an idiot. You only make it worse by saying quotes such as: No they won't.- White Sox vs. A's , 4/10/07 (L)
QUOTE(caulfield12 @ Apr 11, 2007 -> 12:16 AM) It bounced off his head on the rebound. And Canseco is a huge guy, Pods isn't. If countless fans across major league baseball can bare-hand catch home runs and fouls balls without shattering their hands, I'm sure a major league ballplayer is capable of sustaining the force of a drifting fly ball hitting them atop their caps.- White Sox vs. A's , 4/10/07 (L)
Let's see if Guillen adds upon his poor decisions and leaves out Podsednik against Kennedy tomorrow instead of shifting Erstad to LF. Anderson will play regardless (atleast according to previous comments by Ozzie), but I'm curious whether the coaches will attempt to ensure our leadoff hitters confidence remains.- Sox Loss Postgame Thread
QUOTE(fathom @ Apr 10, 2007 -> 11:58 PM) Well, it's only been 7 games, but at least KW looks like a genius for not extending Crede or Dye. I wish Dye would make himself look good and guarantee us Class A compensation when he leaves. Watching Dye trudge through mud (aka field a ball in the outfield) is a hell of a lot easier when he's producing. Not the recent example of looking like a minor leaguer and failing to lay off insider pitches.- White Sox vs. A's , 4/10/07 (L)
QUOTE(StrangeSox @ Apr 10, 2007 -> 11:55 PM) Pods should have caught that ball. Ozzie shouldn't have had him in there in such a close game. Typical excuses. It's not 100% their fault (Bobby gets the burden), but they are still part of the problem. There's no guarantee we would have won the game, but Jesus, if the ball can hit you in the head obviously it shouldn't be too difficult to place your arm above it and complete an out to end the inning.- White Sox vs. A's , 4/10/07 (L)
I believe a baseball hitting Podsednik on the head counts as a typical Oakland freak occurrence. You can blame Jenks for giving up the hits, but you certaintly can't blame him for overthrowing the catcher or failing to catch a flyball.- White Sox vs. A's, 4/09/07 (W)
chat room. That is all.- White Sox vs. A's, 4/09/07 (W)
QUOTE(Jimbo @ Apr 9, 2007 -> 10:27 AM) Weird things happen in Oakland...im scared You can usually count on one fluke play a series benefiting Oakland. I'm going to say Podsednik will attempt to field a long fly ball at the LF wall, misplay it, and have it touch his glove and fly over the fence for a HR. This HR will be the deciding factor in the game.- Films
QUOTE(Brian @ Apr 9, 2007 -> 08:05 AM) Why? Because it is not a great art film? No movie really deserves a remake. If a movie was great, why re-do it, and if it was bad, why re do it? If a re-make is done well, it could work. Halloween may not be on the level of Gone With the Wind or Casablanca, but it was key in the horror genre and film history, IMO. No, because it's a great film period. Point here is, where is the line drawn? First Texas Chainsaw Massacre, then Halloween; next it'll be A Nightmare on Elm Street, Hellraiser, etc. Remake any of the hundreds of movies with good ideas and poor execution before touching a horror classic.- Films
QUOTE(Sonik22 @ Apr 8, 2007 -> 10:57 PM) Is anybody else pumped for Rob Zombie's remake of Halloween? Hell no. Halloween doesn't deserve a hip, fresh, psychedelic-infused 2007 adaption. And I'm not one to complain about Hollywood churning out remake after remake, either. Certain movies -- such as "Hills Have Eyes" and "Assault on Precinct 13" -- were cult classics previously unknown to the general public. Remakes are well received (at least in my opinion) in situations such as these. I'll list several movies right here I'd consider a remake before Halloween: Suspiria, Bad Taste, Demons, Dellamorte Dellamore. All are foreign-based films which could be further enhanced with a budget and some creative minds. What's a shame is there's no shortage of material out in the world. Countless horror novels are available which have yet to be touched. I'd love it if someone made a movie out of one of my favorite horror-themed novels by Robert McCammon called, "Boy's Life." One remake which I'm looking forward to (because the book was tremendous) is "I Am Legend." It has been done several times, under different pretenses, but even with Will Smith I'm hoping it will hold some of the book's uniqueness.- White Sox vs. Twins, 4/8/07 (L)
Well, good to know that Dye and Thome don't know how to recognize a fastball. Or a hanging breaking ball. And Pierzynski's game ending grounder was delicious.- White Sox vs. Twins, 4/8/07 (L)
Another embarrassing performance against Santana. Anyone else realize in the last two starts against lefties (Sowers and Santana) we have only 2 hits? That's pathetic.- If KW trades for a minor league leadoff man, it will be
QUOTE(Craig Grebeck @ Apr 7, 2007 -> 12:34 PM) Gomez, Aybar, and Callaspo are all brutal offensively. Jacoby would be interesting, but I just don't see the Red Sox parting with him. Red Sox won't trade him. They're more likely to trade Crisp in a few seasons than block Ellsbury or let him go. White Sox just have to develop their own leadoff talent. And pitching talent. And catching talent. And middle infield talent. And quality outfielders who actually remain on the ballclub. - Sox Loss Postgame Thread