Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Lip Man 1

Members

Everything posted by Lip Man 1

  1. I figure when all is said and done 80-82. Just hope they don't get swept this weekend. Mark
  2. QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jun 30, 2016 -> 04:38 PM) Nope. It goes back to like 1965...I think that's what they said during the broadcast. First Kevan Smith, now Davidson? Weird anti-Herm Schneider going ons this year. Webb out for the year, Petricka out for the year, Jackson injured. Still doesn't amount to the injury losses other teams have faced (and are facing), though. Don't forget Coats couldn't finish his first game either because of the collision. Regarding the injuries it's actually worse for the Sox because they have little to no depth and the minor league call up's have been "lacking" to put it mildly. Mark
  3. By the way I think the Sox have now hit 14 consecutive solo home runs. Nice to get the win. Bad news about Davidson. The baseball gods are saying again it's not your season. Mark
  4. Unbelievable. Only the White Sox friends and neighbors. Mark
  5. Hope the kid does well and then they can s***can Garcia. We'll see. Mark
  6. Nice to see the offense show up. Somehow Shields only gave up one run despite eight hits and a walk in seven innings. That ninth inning was just ugly, most of those runs were unearned though. One final thought, Purke sucks. Mark
  7. Lip Man 1 replied to FT35's topic in Pale Hose Talk
    QUOTE (ptatc @ Jun 29, 2016 -> 03:30 PM) Wow, I had a fan? I'm just trying to get people to realize it is not KW. No matter how much people want to lame one person on whom they can focus all of their ager and frustration, it just isn't true. Keep your head in the sand if you want but you are focusing on much on one person. Oh I agree it is a systemic organizational problem. Not just one individual, however I'm convinced Kenny still has a large say in things and we've seen what his M.O. has been for 15 years (i.e. "go for it" every year, trade minor leaguers, bring in vets generally on the downside of their careers, continually trying to make the "big splash" for some reason) Mark
  8. Lip Man 1 replied to FT35's topic in Pale Hose Talk
    QUOTE (gosoxgo2005 @ Jun 29, 2016 -> 02:10 PM) So what was a three year window has rapidly became a year and a half window. We all know this team isn't doing s*** this year, so it could probably be considered a 1 year window. Others may be more optimistic, but I'm assuming they will be s*** again next year. Sooo I'm gonna go ahead and consider said window closed. This organization sucks Personally I think Kenny just talked off the cuff in an effort to deflect the criticism the organization was taking after "winning" the off season then falling flat on their faces to start 2015. I honestly don't know if there really is such a thing since the organization has been very quiet about this. Mark
  9. QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Jun 29, 2016 -> 03:48 PM) Why is Jason Coats on the team? I mean really? Maybe he's terrible. Maybe he's not. he's had like 20 plate appearances. Shuck and Garcia have had years worth of at-bats. Garcia has a .656 OPS and a wRc+ of 76. Shuck is even worse with a .571 and 47 wRc+. It's ridiculous. I feel your pain but what other options do they have? The fact that ALL of the guys you mentioned as actually on the big league roster shows how bereft of talent the organization really is doesn't it? This three years after they started cutting out the deadwood in 2013. Mark
  10. Lip Man 1 replied to FT35's topic in Pale Hose Talk
    QUOTE (FT35 @ Jun 29, 2016 -> 12:18 PM) I think it's sensible to put at least Robertson out there. We have an outside chance of making the playoffs but many teams in front of us and the inability to win divisional games. Having a resource of Robertson's caliber for a .500 team is not critical. He's saved 20 of our 77 games. He's much more valuable to a playoff-bound team. Putnam and Jones both have better numbers than Robertson and could most likely cover the 9th. I'd love to see if they could get a couple of pieces for Robertson now and if they actually make the unlikely climb back into the race, maybe make a splash and get someone else at the deadline or maybe turn to someone like Carson Fulmer like they did with Bobby Jenks in 05'. But in all likelihood, if we were to climb back into the race by then, it would be because Putnam and Jones were getting the job done, so we might not have to change anything! Putnam though is probably done for the year. Mark
  11. Lip Man 1 replied to FT35's topic in Pale Hose Talk
    QUOTE (ptatc @ Jun 29, 2016 -> 11:55 AM) Unbelievable........ PTATC: Don't know if you know this but in fact it was Kenny who talked to the mainstream media last June about the "three year window / plan." Until then nobody had heard much if anything along those lines. Green is not making something up here, Kenny did say this. Mark
  12. You have to give JR credit, he's got the best stadium lease agreement in baseball: http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/201...ough-the-summer Now as to why the Sox don't have a much higher payroll and a better talent level given the stadium circumstances, that's a question I can't answer. Mark
  13. In his last nine starts Quintana has received nine runs of support. Seven losses and two no decisions in that span. And I didn't realize the Sox have now lost 16 of their last 19 divisional games. That's why to me any talk of "going for it" and trading any more minor league players is sheer stupidity or sheer stubbornness. This team isn't going anywhere because they can't beat teams in their division who apparently have them scouted to a tee. Mark
  14. QUOTE (Footlongcomiskeydog @ Jun 28, 2016 -> 09:05 PM) The comedy routine is out on the field at 35th and Shields but it is a dark comedy lead by an incompetent manager and an in over his head gm. A third of the supporting cast are bit actors. Only one major attraction and he is only available every 5 days. A lot of truth in that comment in my opinion. Mark
  15. Can't say I'm surprised after all Q was pitching but to get shut out especially by a mediocre starter with ZERO wins and an ERA of over five is really, really embarrassing. Mark
  16. Lip Man 1 replied to FT35's topic in Pale Hose Talk
    QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Jun 28, 2016 -> 03:01 PM) Erik Johnson is right-handed and also bad. Well to this point anyway James Shields is right handed and also bad. Mark
  17. Lip Man 1 replied to FT35's topic in Pale Hose Talk
    But the flip side of that is how many runs will he allow and cost games because of his bad defense? Mark
  18. QUOTE (FT35 @ Jun 27, 2016 -> 11:43 AM) We have to be careful because this is the type of deal people throw stones at if it doesn't pan out. Getting those 2 would likely cost us several pieces of our farm system. So now, Hahn needs to save his job by making a trade that everyone will accuse him of screwing up because Reddick and Vogt are vets?? Our fan base needs to pull on the same end of the rope in what they rake our management over the coals for. DO we want youth or do we want vets? The proven vet trades haven't worked out, but it seems like all the people who throw stones at management for making such deals, are the same ones calling for them to be made to save the guy's job! Hahn was a genius to land Samardzija--exactly the RHP starter that we needed--then Holy CRAP...Hahn is an idiot for trading pieces of our farm system to get a scrub like Samardzija. Hahn needs to find a way to land a proven starter like James Shields if he wants to save his job--then--we need to FIRE Hahn because he brings in losers like James Shields! You can see it...Finally...Hahn makes a great deal to land Reddick and Vogt!!! Just what we needed!!! Then Vogt hits the DL the same week Reddick goes into a 3-25 slump and the masses prepare for a stoning and life without Carson Fulmer. Post has a lot of truth in it, in my opinion. That's what happens though when the organizational philosophy seems to be muddled and fans generally have no idea if the team is "rebuilding," "going for it" and so forth. In addition the Sox themselves have never really seemed willing to go all in, as in spend a tremendous amount of money on the farm system or raising the payroll high enough to get the top free agents when they become available. They are caught between the proverbial "rock and a hard place..." and that filters down to the fan base. Mark
  19. Lip Man 1 replied to FT35's topic in Pale Hose Talk
    QUOTE (Thad Bosley @ Jun 27, 2016 -> 09:57 AM) Where it gets interesting at Camp Reinsdorf is when the Chairman decides to weigh in with his views about getting from "Point A to Point B to Point C". Remember that doozy from back when Larry Himes was the GM in the late 80s? By year four of Himes' term he had built as strong of a core of young talent as you could hope for, collected through both strong draft choices and shrewd trades, resulting in a 94 win season in Himes' fourth year. Yet in his relentless wisdom, Reinsdorf decided to give Himes the heave-ho at the end of that fourth year, reasoning in somewhat of a flimsy fashion that he felt while Himes was able to get the team from "Point A to Point B", he didn't think he was the guy to get the team to "Point C". (Meanwhile, the guy he brought into replace Himes, Ron Schueler, spent ten years failing to get the team to Point C himself, but I digress!). But here we are in Year Five under Hahn's direction, and Point B doesn't appear to be anywhere in sight. I guess the famed loyalty program wasn't quite as established back in Himes' day as it appears to be today. Too bad for Larry! Himes was fired because JR didn't get along with him. The straw that broke the camels back happened at the trade deadline of 1990 according to what Jeff Torborg told me: ML: At the trade deadline the Sox were only three games behind the A’s yet the only thing the organization did was get reserve outfielder Phil Bradley from the Orioles. Were you disappointed especially since there was a lot of talk about the Sox getting guys like pitcher Mike Scott? JT: “Sure we were disappointed especially since that same day the A’s picked up Harold Baines and Willie McGee. I was sitting in my hotel room when I saw the news come across the TV and I thought ‘how did that happen?’ because we were behind Oakland, we could have put in a claim. At almost the same time I was thinking this I got a call from Jerry Reinsdorf and he asked me ‘what’s going on?’ All I could tell him was that I didn’t know.” “And you mentioned Mike Scott…this is the first time I’ve ever heard anything like that. If that’s true that just goes to show you that I wasn’t involved in everything that may have been going on. (Author’s Note: ESPN’s “Baseball Tonight’s” lead anchor Dave Marash reported when Larry Himes was fired in mid September, that part of the reason was, that he wasn’t interested in trading any of his minor league talent for more highly regarded players for the stretch drive. This apparently caused a wedge between him and ownership.) JR himself in a rare interview came right out and said why Himes was fired when he went on Chet Coppock's radio show that September. It basically was a Thibs comment years before that went down: “The fact is, Larry Himes cannot get along with anybody. You can hardly find anybody in the Sox organization that wasn’t happy when Larry Himes left.” Regarding the Hahn column, it's only natural that if the team continues to spin its wheels seemingly without direction (rebuild? reload? three year plan?) questions are going to start being asked about the decision makers above Ventura. Mark
  20. Since I realistically don't think this team can contend (because they simply can't beat teams in their division other than Minnesota...so far anyway) I at least hope they can have a winning season when it's all done record-wise and Sale gets to 20 victories. Mark
  21. In case you're wondering about details from the first time the Sox hit seven home runs in a game: April 23, 1955 - The White Sox hammered the Athletics 29-6 at Kansas City. The 29 runs was an American League record for years. The Sox hit seven home runs that night. Walt Dropo and Bob Nieman each had seven RBI’s. Sherm Lollar and “Minnie” Minoso added five each. Mark
  22. QUOTE (Condor13 @ Jun 25, 2016 -> 03:38 PM) First team since 2004 to lose when hitting 7+ HRs Who was that team? Just wondering. Sox tied the club record today with seven home runs in a game. Set originally in April 1955 in the Sox 29-6 destruction of the Kansas City A's. Mark
  23. 23 years ago, June 22, 1993 Carlton Fisk Night was celebrated at Comiskey Park II. It was the night Fisk's passed Bob Boone's record for most games caught in a big league career. The crowd went wild when Bo Jackson drove a motorcycle in from center field to present to Pudge at home plate and then Fisk spoke to the fans acknowledging his night. Halfway down this page you can hear some of the audio of that speech: http://www.chicagonow.com/soxnet/2016/06/t...-day-walsh-day/ Mark
  24. I guess for Shields allowing five hits and walking four in five innings is an "improvement..." Mark
  25. QUOTE (SCCWS @ Jun 23, 2016 -> 07:34 PM) So did Anderson and Eaton. Eaton had a pretty good series but he was hitting .280 ish and didn't deliver either. I believe the announcers said the White Sox have won more World Series titles in the last 90 years than they swept series in Boston. 3 out of 4 on the road is a solid week. Sox last swept a four game series in Boston in 1927 I believe. Mark

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.