Everything posted by Bob Sacamano
- Sox have "flexibility" to add "long term pieces"
- Sox have "flexibility" to add "long term pieces"
-
White Sox projected arb salaries
Could also have been that the organization had a high price on him. They've stuck by Avi this long and seem to love him, which is why he will be here next year.
- Sox have "flexibility" to add "long term pieces"
- Sox have "flexibility" to add "long term pieces"
- Sox have "flexibility" to add "long term pieces"
-
White Sox projected arb salaries
Robertson and/or Soria reunion? Brad Brach? Sergio Romo? Ryan Madson or Santiago Casilla (both 38) on one year deals? Trevor Rosenthal on an incentive based one year deal so he can prove he's healthy? There's a lot of veteran options out there this off-season and they should have no issue adding -3 to the mix. https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2016/12/2018-19-mlb-free-agents.html
-
White Sox projected arb salaries
Yeah I tend to agree. As the top catcher on the market, I saw he was projected to get about 4/$60m.
-
White Sox projected arb salaries
Yeah I meant to say they will tender him a contract.
-
White Sox projected arb salaries
Sometimes even more like Palka. Dude just got a shot with us because we are rebuilding and look at him now: probably DH on opening day next year.
-
White Sox projected arb salaries
While I agree that others should see playing time instead, I think the front office will tender him a contract.
- Sox have "flexibility" to add "long term pieces"
-
2018 White Sox catch-all thread
Have the rotation be Rodon, Lopez, Giolito, a bounce-back veteran type with some upside (NOT Shields as he had no trade value this year), and then a battle between Stephens, Guerrero, Fulmer, anyone else worth a look next year for the 5th spot.
-
2018 White Sox catch-all thread
I've read that they are only listening on some rental players at the beginning of the off-season and then based on the offers, deciding if they will rebuild or try to contend. I mean, I guess a team in that position could middle it? Trade the guys with one year left for prospects and also try to sign free agents?
- Sox have "flexibility" to add "long term pieces"
- Sox have "flexibility" to add "long term pieces"
- Sox have "flexibility" to add "long term pieces"
-
White Sox projected arb salaries
I still see no way Avi is non-tendered. Not saying that's what I want but the organization has stuck with him this long so who knows. I expect him to be on the team next year.
- Sox have "flexibility" to add "long term pieces"
-
Dear FO: Harper VS Machado, Soxtalk Will Help You Decide
I agree with most of what you are saying, but I think Rizzo is the one who stays forever.
- Sox have "flexibility" to add "long term pieces"
-
Dear FO: Harper VS Machado, Soxtalk Will Help You Decide
You have me intrigued.
-
Dear FO: Harper VS Machado, Soxtalk Will Help You Decide
I kind of have him pegged there as well. It just means they wouldn't retain Judge long-term (most likely) but you would have Judge, Stanton, and Machado in the same lineup for what, 4 years? Then they deal Andujar or Didi (1 year left) for pitching.
-
Dear FO: Harper VS Machado, Soxtalk Will Help You Decide
Not sure about that. Both those teams reset their luxury tax penalties this year.
-
2018 Cubs catch-all thread
I literally thought to myself earlier: "Will we ever see a team have a 12 or 13-man staff strictly built with relievers that can go multiple innings?" Maybe if it were have 2 really good SP that could pitch 6 or 7 + every 1st and 3rd or 4th turn in the rotation.