9 minutes ago, Y2Jimmy0 said:

That's the first thing I did haha. It's there. It's under Futures. He's +400 now though.

Not there for me in Futures. Always errors out when I search "MLB Draft" or any of the top picks names. RIP.

4 hours ago, DirtySox said:

Not there for me in Futures. Always errors out when I search "MLB Draft" or any of the top picks names. RIP.

Where are you located? Maybe draft bets aren't allowed? I couldn't bet on the NFL draft in Pittsburgh this year

42 minutes ago, Y2Jimmy0 said:

Where are you located? Maybe draft bets aren't allowed? I couldn't bet on the NFL draft in Pittsburgh this year

Virginia. Has to be that. Came to that conclusion when sleuthing earlier. Enjoy your Emerson winnings. 😉

8 hours ago, Y2Jimmy0 said:

Cholowsky also has hit/power combo and is a plus defender. If Emerson's hit tool is actually a 55 and not a 65-70, he's just not a star.

I surmise from all of this that Emerson has a much higher hit potential than Roch; otherwise Roch would be well ahead for #1.  What’s Roch’s likely outcome if things go well? Dansby?  I’ll go with riskier upside bat.     

That said, I’d be surprised if Roch isn’t the pick.  

Edited 2 hours ago2 hr by GreenSox

39 minutes ago, GreenSox said:

I surmise from all of this that Emerson has a much higher hit potential than Roch; otherwise Roch would be well ahead for #1.  What’s Roch’s likely outcome if things go well? Dansby?  I’ll go with riskier upside bat.     

That said, I’d be surprised if Roch isn’t the pick.  

I like the Tulowitzki/Correa comp better than Swanson.