Chisoxfn Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 Around the Winter Meetings: Putz, Crisp, Matsui, and More Coco Crisp Interested in Sox The 30 year old outfielder, while talking Tribune report Mark Gonzales, publicly talked about how much he enjoyed playing in Chicago and alluded to the fact that he would love to play in the city and is at the point where he's waiting on the Sox to make a move. SN Take: Crisp probably shouldn't be a starting outfielder on a contending team, but given the limited resources the Sox have, Crisp might be the clubs best option. Crisp starting for the Sox would sit nicer if the club is able to agree to a contract with DH/LF Hideki Matsui. Matsui would fill a major void at the top of the order and allow the Sox to get away with a little less in the outfield (ie, Crisp). And while Crisp hasn't produced at an acceptable level for a leadoff hitter over the past couple season, he possesses the skill-set to be a near league average lead-off hitter. He would also provide the Sox with improved outfield defense and base-running. Would I be excited about Crisp leading off for the Sox, No, but with the rotation the club possesses, the addition of a legitimate DH (see Matsui), and a quality reliever (see Putz), the Sox would emerge from the winter-meetings as the run-away favorite in the AL Central. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan3530 Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 assuming the money is the same i would rather have pods back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melissa1334 Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 QUOTE (soxfan3530 @ Dec 9, 2009 -> 01:37 PM) assuming the money is the same i would rather have pods back. ill take crisp, atleast he can catch the ball and wont get picked off 20 times Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 There's also no reason to believe the money and years will be equal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted December 9, 2009 Author Share Posted December 9, 2009 QUOTE (Kalapse @ Dec 9, 2009 -> 11:40 AM) There's also no reason to believe the money and years will be equal. Crisp won't get more than $2 million. Pods is currently asking for a lot more than that and is trying to get it over multiple years. The Sox won't do that and don't want to wait. I see the club signing Crisp and if they can land Matsui also, than Kenny will spend the rest of his off-season quietly looking to find a way to get a young outfielder into Chicago with the potential to be a leadoff hitter. It might not happen, but If he lands his DH and gets at least an insurance option for the top of the order (Crisp), he won't have to do much else and should be able to win the division or at least be in position to win the division come the trade-deadline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted December 9, 2009 Author Share Posted December 9, 2009 Honestly, if healthy, I might take Crisp over Pods. Crisp is a much better defender who is capable of playing good defense at two outfield positions (LF & CF) and is simply put a superior base-runner, imo. If Crisp shoulders aren't healthy though and can't handle the contact, than Pods would be the better option. I wouldn't give Pods 4-5M for 1 year and certainly wouldn't give him a 2 or 3 yr deal worth that sort of money and right now that is the bottom line of what he is looking for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 Matsui + Crisp = set offense. Add a reliever like Putz and the team is set. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSox05 Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Dec 9, 2009 -> 01:43 PM) Crisp won't get more than $2 million. Pods is currently asking for a lot more than that and is trying to get it over multiple years. The Sox won't do that and don't want to wait. I see the club signing Crisp and if they can land Matsui also, than Kenny will spend the rest of his off-season quietly looking to find a way to get a young outfielder into Chicago with the potential to be a leadoff hitter. It might not happen, but If he lands his DH and gets at least an insurance option for the top of the order (Crisp), he won't have to do much else and should be able to win the division or at least be in position to win the division come the trade-deadline. I think that would be great. As long as Crisp is healthy. What's the word on his injuries? Is he ready to play out of the gate? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted December 9, 2009 Author Share Posted December 9, 2009 QUOTE (GoSox05 @ Dec 9, 2009 -> 11:51 AM) I think that would be great. As long as Crisp is healthy. What's the word on his injuries? Is he ready to play out of the gate? The Tribune is reporting that he'll be heatlhy by spring training. Still, shoulder injuries can really impact your career. They effect your swing and can easily be re-injured. Hopefully he's done all of the necessary strength and conditioning training. Ptac, what type of concerns would there be for re-injury and is this a type of injury that someone can fully recover from (baseball wise) or will it always hinder him to an extent? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 QUOTE (Melissa1334 @ Dec 9, 2009 -> 07:39 PM) ill take crisp, atleast he can catch the ball and wont get picked off 20 times He needs to get on base first. Podsednik hit at a better average and is healthy. Crisp had both shoulders worked on and we don't know if he will be or can stay healthy for the year. His skills have diminished the last couple seasons. If he wants to come to Chicago let him go to the Cubs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AWhiteSoxinNJ Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 Good, go to the Cubs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Dec 9, 2009 -> 01:45 PM) Honestly, if healthy, I might take Crisp over Pods. Crisp is a much better defender who is capable of playing good defense at two outfield positions (LF & CF) and is simply put a superior base-runner, imo. If Crisp shoulders aren't healthy though and can't handle the contact, than Pods would be the better option. I wouldn't give Pods 4-5M for 1 year and certainly wouldn't give him a 2 or 3 yr deal worth that sort of money and right now that is the bottom line of what he is looking for. Crisp is the vastly superior base runner and defender. If he's healthy there's no doubt in my mind who I take. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Dec 9, 2009 -> 07:55 PM) The Tribune is reporting that he'll be heatlhy by spring training. Still, shoulder injuries can really impact your career. They effect your swing and can easily be re-injured. Hopefully he's done all of the necessary strength and conditioning training. Ptac, what type of concerns would there be for re-injury and is this a type of injury that someone can fully recover from (baseball wise) or will it always hinder him to an extent? Coco said that and I wouldn't expect him to say otherwise even if he wasn't Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Dec 9, 2009 -> 01:58 PM) Coco said that and I wouldn't expect him to say otherwise even if he wasn't That's why you have a medical staff. Once they get his medical records and put him through a physical they should get a clear enough picture of his time table. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuiceCruz16 Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 Crisp brings much more to the table then Pods. Now his health, as others have stated is the only problem with the comparision. Pods does not have a good history of staying healthy either though. If it's between Crisp or Pods, give me Co Co! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Beast Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 In reality, how much is Pods looking for? 3 years, 12 million or something? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chetkincaid Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 Man those shoulders are SCARY though. He could be a season ending injury waiting to happen. Coco or Pods? Eh, at this point I'm almost willing to say trade for Angel Pagon and give him a chance to lead off for a full season. We might find something special in him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan3530 Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Dec 9, 2009 -> 01:43 PM) Crisp won't get more than $2 million. Pods is currently asking for a lot more than that and is trying to get it over multiple years. The Sox won't do that and don't want to wait. I see the club signing Crisp and if they can land Matsui also, than Kenny will spend the rest of his off-season quietly looking to find a way to get a young outfielder into Chicago with the potential to be a leadoff hitter. It might not happen, but If he lands his DH and gets at least an insurance option for the top of the order (Crisp), he won't have to do much else and should be able to win the division or at least be in position to win the division come the trade-deadline. Ideally you get one of these two guys as a stop gap and Mitchell/Danks will be ready to fill that role in a year or two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jphat007 Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 Just so long as Matsui comes with him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFirebird Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 QUOTE (Kalapse @ Dec 9, 2009 -> 01:57 PM) Crisp is the vastly superior base runner and defender. If he's healthy there's no doubt in my mind who I take. This is the exact reason I don't want Pods back. Our defense has enough problems as is..another year of Pods in LF or on the bases would just be an adventure I don't want to take. Give me Covelli Crisp any day over Pods. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 (edited) We need real players like Granderson instead of guys like Crisp who are broken down or Jones, Omar who are old news or simply old. Our starting rotation is simply awesome, congrats to KW. The rest of the team ... will keep us at or a little above or below .500. Of course there's always the chance Rios, Lexi, Teahen, CQ, have career years. If they do, then I guess we have a chance to do something special. I'm assuming Kenny will tweak the pen a bit and it will be better than average before he's done. Edited December 9, 2009 by greg775 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Chappas Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 I'll take Coco's iffy shoulders over prancers iffy hamstrings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chetkincaid Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 Imagine trying to swing a bat with not one, but with TWO bad shoulders... Ouch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G&T Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 QUOTE (The Beast @ Dec 9, 2009 -> 03:06 PM) In reality, how much is Pods looking for? 3 years, 12 million or something? I think he wants 2 yrs, $15M. I can't remember where I heard that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bschmaranz Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 (edited) QUOTE (G&T @ Dec 9, 2009 -> 02:24 PM) I think he wants 2 yrs, $15M. I can't remember where I heard that. I've read the $7M/per number in a couple places so that sounds about right. He needs to put down the pretty glass pipe though. If he gets a dime over 4 a year I'll be shocked. Edited December 9, 2009 by bschmaranz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.