Jump to content

Cespedes Re-signs with the Mets


dayan024
 Share

Recommended Posts

Ozuna was a four plus WAR guy just two years ago, is still under control for a long time and can play CF.

 

Like Inciarte, it's going to take more than Adams "plus" to get him.

 

We just don't have enough quality minor league depth remaining to not have to surrender Anderson or Fulmer. If you're all in, it means trading Anderson and having no long-term deal in sight for SS or catcher. The other teams with top 10-20 systems are better positioned for this move.

 

If you assume Anderson is worth 20+ WAR at SS, that's a tough pill to swallow. If you're not sold on him sticking at short, then you deal him for Ozuna, but it's an incredibly tough call to make for Hahn.

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jan 6, 2016 -> 03:46 PM)
Ozuna was a four plus WAR guy just two years ago, is still under control for a long time and can play CF.

 

Like Inciarte, it's going to take more than Adams "plus" to get him.

 

We just don't have enough quality minor league depth remaining to not have to surrender Anderson or Fulmer. If you're all in, it means trading Anderson and having no long-term deal in sight for SS or catcher. The other teams with top 10-20 systems are better positioned for this move.

 

Exactly. Which is why I'd rather just sign a bat since it only costs money.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Jan 6, 2016 -> 01:45 PM)
I think the likelihood of the Sox trading for an outfielder has gone up. Imo, the FA outfielders are too costly. We shall see. The rest of this week and weekend should be a fun ride!

 

How much more can the Sox dip into their system at this point, though?

 

That's my biggest concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jan 6, 2016 -> 03:46 PM)
Ozuna was a four plus WAR guy just two years ago, is still under control for a long time and can play CF.

 

Like Inciarte, it's going to take more than Adams "plus" to get him.

 

We just don't have enough quality minor league depth remaining to not have to surrender Anderson or Fulmer. If you're all in, it means trading Anderson and having no long-term deal in sight for SS or catcher. The other teams with top 10-20 systems are better positioned for this move.

They are not all in to the pint of trading anderson or fulmer. If RH wouldn't trade them in the Frazier package, he wouldn't do it for ozuna. If the mlbtr texas package is to believed than a package centered around adams may work. Not syaing it will but it's another option to explore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (SoCalSox @ Jan 6, 2016 -> 04:50 PM)
How much more can the Sox dip into their system at this point, though?

 

That's my biggest concern.

If you're not willing to trade Anderson or Fulmer and you hesitate on Adams then either:

1. You land Cespedes

2. You land Upton

3. You land 1-2 of the lesser guys and for some reason are confident that puts you over the top.

 

If the Sox aren't willing to dip into their system at that level, and pay the price it will take for a guy in a trade equivalent to the top guys, they still need to come up with something and they better believe it makes them a division contender. Really no other options. It has to be one of those 3 or trading someone they don't want to trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 6, 2016 -> 01:52 PM)
If you're not willing to trade Anderson or Fulmer and you hesitate on Adams then either:

1. You land Cespedes

2. You land Upton

3. You land 1-2 of the lesser guys and for some reason are confident that puts you over the top.

 

If the Sox aren't willing to dip into their system at that level, and pay the price it will take for a guy in a trade equivalent to the top guys, they still need to come up with something and they better believe it makes them a division contender. Really no other options. It has to be one of those 3 or trading someone they don't want to trade.

 

That's what I would think, too.

 

My biggest worry is that they aren't going to buck up for one of the top 2 remaining guys.

 

Cespedes still makes the most sense in terms of availability & ties but I'm worried they are going to limit themselves on years alone & screw themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jan 6, 2016 -> 04:46 PM)
Ozuna was a four plus WAR guy just two years ago, is still under control for a long time and can play CF.

 

Like Inciarte, it's going to take more than Adams "plus" to get him.

 

We just don't have enough quality minor league depth remaining to not have to surrender Anderson or Fulmer. If you're all in, it means trading Anderson and having no long-term deal in sight for SS or catcher. The other teams with top 10-20 systems are better positioned for this move.

 

If you assume Anderson is worth 20+ WAR at SS, that's a tough pill to swallow. If you're not sold on him sticking at short, then you deal him for Ozuna, but it's an incredibly tough call to make for Hahn.

FWIW:

Marlins wanted No. 1 starter for Ozuna. That didn't help his trade market. Haven't heard any buzz on him in a while. https://t.co/f1AySoBhkQ

 

— Jerry Crasnick (@jcrasnick) January 6, 2016

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 6, 2016 -> 03:55 PM)
FWIW:

 

On one hand, the Marlins can't price themselves out of the market when there are lots of veteran OFers who be acquired for less talent but taking on more salary. Ozuna and Inciarte have much more appeal because of age.

 

Ozuna is also a player they're seemingly going to have to move because of Loria's whims.

 

That said, like a Puig or Chapman, there's a point where the reward outweighs the risk for every team on the market.

 

Whether that price is Anderson or Fulmer, it's not going to be garbage or some combination of three to five top 5-20 players in our system with limited upsides. I don't think Hawkins and Adams gets it done, for example.

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jan 6, 2016 -> 04:05 PM)
On one hand, the Marlins can't price themselves out of the market when there are lots of veterans who becacquired for less talent but taking on more salary.

 

Ozuna is a player they're seemingly going to have to move because of Loria's whims.

 

That said, like a Puig or Chapman, there's a point where the reward outweighs the risk fo acquiring teams.

 

Whether that price is Anderson or Fulmer, it's not going to be garbage or some combination of three to five top 6-15 players in our system with limited upsides. I don't think Hawkins and Adams gets it done, for example.

 

I don't get the impression that the Marlins particularly care if a player is unhappy or not.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ Jan 6, 2016 -> 04:04 PM)
You have quite a knack for repeatedly mentioning Inciarte in multiple threads that have nothing to do with him.

 

Fine, do you want a separate thread on him?

 

Yes or no?

 

Or to stick all that into the catch-all of other outfield options...which is cluttered already.

 

I'm sure sooner or later if Cespedes is off the table there will be individual threads about 10-15 different possibilities popping up on a daily basis based on which ones are getting the most twitter mentions connecting them to the Whie Sox somehow.

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (SoCalSox @ Jan 6, 2016 -> 04:56 PM)
I think the White Sox become instant contenders if they add one of the big 2 but if they fail to do that, I just can't see how adding a Fowler or Jackson gets them where they need to be.

If Justin Upton, a 3.6 fWAR player last year and 4.0 fWAR the year before that, makes them a competitor, then Dexter Fowler, a 3.2 fWAR player last year and 1.4 fWAR the year before that leaves them still pretty darn competitive. That's not the difference between 88 and 82 wins. If Dexter Fowler doesn't make them competitive, then the big 2 probably doesn't make them competitive either. They'd have a tiny bit of extra work to do in the latter case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 6, 2016 -> 04:10 PM)
If Justin Upton, a 3.6 fWAR player last year and 4.0 fWAR the year before that, makes them a competitor, then Dexter Fowler, a 3.2 fWAR player last year and 1.7 fWAR the year before that leaves them still pretty darn competitive. That's not the difference between 88 and 82 wins. If Dexter Fowler doesn't make them competitive, then the big 2 probably doesn't make them competitive either. They'd have a tiny bit of extra work to do in the latter case.

 

And that lower WAR was in the AL with Houston at a younger age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (SoCalSox @ Jan 6, 2016 -> 03:50 PM)
How much more can the Sox dip into their system at this point, though?

 

That's my biggest concern.

Depends on the outfielder the Sox are interested in. There's a variety to choose from that have different values.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (SoCalSox @ Jan 6, 2016 -> 04:50 PM)
How much more can the Sox dip into their system at this point, though?

 

That's my biggest concern.

That's where I'm at. Land Cespedes and keep your pick. Then add a RHP starter. If Hahn's feeling froggy maybe even add Desmond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (SouthSideSale @ Jan 6, 2016 -> 02:23 PM)
That's where I'm at. Land Cespedes and keep your pick. Then add a RHP starter. If Hahn's feeling froggy maybe even add Desmond.

 

Exactly, they did more than enough within the trade market. Sack up, pay Cespedes & move on to the next move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...