mac9001
Members-
Posts
1,677 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by mac9001
-
QUOTE(Buehrle>Wood @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 10:01 PM) Thank you very much. Run support: Jon Garland: 7.11 Mark Buehrle: 4.00 Roy Halladay: 3.71 A main factor in pitchers picking up wins is runs is run support, thus making Halladay's 10 wins ever more impressive.
-
QUOTE(LosMediasBlancas @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 09:53 PM) Why? Halladay 10-4, 2.53 ERA, 11 QS, 0.95 WHIP Buehrle 8-1, 2.67 ERA, 11 QS, 1.05 WHIP Garland 12-2, 3.40 ERA, 10 QS, 1.09 WHIP and seeing as Halladay also has more IP and Ks i'd say he's more worthy. BTW, Kenny Rogers should get some consideration too.
-
Even though it'd be nice to see a White Sox start the AS game again, at this point i think Roy Halladay is most deserving.
-
No it's not a near sellout, but if you plan on sitting together you'll probably end up somewhere high in the UD. Lower deck usually has 4-5 empty seats together tops on Monday's.
-
QUOTE(Heads22 @ Jun 17, 2005 -> 08:27 PM) No hints. All I'll say is you'll be happy and it's not Ulacia. Is it Dennis Ulacia?
-
Since late '95, early '96, which would put be at about 8-9 years old.
-
A base stealer is only effective if his success rate it above 75%. Scotty has so far been around 80% for his career, so he can be classified as a productive base stealer. If Scotty can keep his OBP above .350 and keep the steal rate above 75% he's an elite leadoff man. IF the steal rate falls below 75% he's better off just staying at first. These numbers don't however take into account the affect a productive base stealer has on a pitcher. here some info about SB effectiveness: http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=2607
-
I don't think the Sox would be willing to give up anything even slightly significant for Feliz. Lets see: Crede: .229 AVG, .300 OBP, .408, SLG, .708 OPS, Age: 27, Scoring Position: .821 OPS, 2005 Salary: $400,000 Feliz: .272 AVG, .309 OBP, .442 SLG, .751 OPS, Age: 31, Scoring Position: .658 OPS, 2005 Salary: $2,325,000 Seeing as how Feliz is older, more expensive and hasn't been exactly great at third base. Not to mention he's not a significant upgrade on offense. Giving up any real prospect for Feliz would be idiotic.
-
QUOTE(JimH @ Jun 8, 2005 -> 10:18 PM) The tv guys are saying Marte's velo is down. 88 on the fastball. Herm Schneider walks Marte off the mound, something is the matter with him. Just to point out the Comcast gun was kinda slow today. El Duque never hit above 85, Politte never hit above 91, and Anderson has been right around 89-91 .
-
QUOTE(redandwhite @ Jun 5, 2005 -> 08:42 PM) That's a terrible way of looking at things. No it's not. I'm a fan, i watch baseball for entertainment purposes. Why should i second guess every move the manger makes? That's KW's job, that's some jackass reporters job. All i ask from Ozzie and the Sox is to bring me some worthy entertainment, they've done that. So sit back relax and enjoy the ride. b****ing about Ozzie won't improve his crappy bullpen management and he's not getting fired any time soon. Enjoy being in first place and holding the league's best record in early June, it might be a while until the Sox are in this position again.
-
Is Ozzie terrible at managing a bullpen? Yes. Is Ozzie for some strange reason infatuated with Timo? Yes. Are the Sox 37-18? YES, SO WHO THE f*** CARES!!! Just enjoy the ride
-
Plus, since when does MTV shy away from controversy? Baah, nobody watches MTVs crappy award show anyways.
-
Daily dose of Perfect Circle (or Tool) New System and Audislave Nine Inch Nails - With Teeth QOTSA- Lullabies To Paralyze Eagles Of Death Metal- Peace love death metal
-
White Sox vs Cubs Game 2 Thread 5-21-05
mac9001 replied to sox-r-us's topic in 2005 Season in Review
BTW, these FOX announcers are pretty good; they might not be Hawk and DJ but have called a very enjoyable game. -
I just wanted to clear something up............
mac9001 replied to Tadahito Iguchi's topic in Pale Hose Talk
MLB rule book on base running: http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/mlb/official...es/runner_7.jsp Doesn't really give you a clear definition in case of a tie. -
Minor League Baseball Audio/video feeds: http://www.minorleaguebaseball.com/app/mil...imedia/grid.jsp I haven't caught any Sox farm teams yet, but you might come across one every now and then.
-
CHW: Hernandez (3-1, 2.70 ERA) TOR: Bush (0-3, 4.97 ERA) -Bush's first career start vs. the Sox. -Has pitched well his last two starts. -Team has a 0-5 record when he pitches. -El Duque last three years vs. TOR: 8 GS, 2-4, 4.03 ERA, .234 AVG -At Skydome (or whatever it's called now): 0-3, 7.79 ERA, in four starts. -However, the only player with good career numbers vs. El Duque is Vernon Wells (21 ABs, 2 HRs, .987 OPS) -Everyone with 10+ career AB has a OPS below .600.
-
QUOTE(Chisoxfn @ May 4, 2005 -> 11:14 AM) On a sidenote....The US NEEDS TO BUILD MORE REFINERIES. The damn environmentalist need to step aside and at least let us build one new refinery if not two or three. The biggest reason for these high prices are the fact that the US is already at capacity when it comes to producing the gas. Environmentalists have nothing to do with the lack of refineries. Current projected cost for a new refinery is over a billion dollars. The only thing that is economically feasible is to expand current refineries. Don’t blame environmentalists, blame the oil companies for not investing in new refineries.
-
QUOTE(NUKE_CLEVELAND @ May 1, 2005 -> 02:49 PM) You can thank enviro wackos for our current problems. Because of their resistance there have been no nuclear plants built in 30 years & no new refining capacity built in 30+ years. Refining capacity, or the lack thereof, is a huge reason why gas is so expensive. We have oil sitting around in inventory but there aren't enough refineries to change it over to gasoline and other distilates to meet demand. You can't really blame the environmentalists for low refining capacity. Iin the early 80s the government stopped subsidizing many small refineries thus slowing refining capacity growth. Taxpayer money was fattening profits for these small refineries and the output from these refineries was not worth the expense. New refineries are just not profitable enough for people to invest money in. Unless we scrap just about every air pollution law, nothing short of huge government subsidiaries would save U.S oil refineries. So once again i return to my original point; the anwser isn't more oil, it's less.
-
QUOTE(CubKilla @ May 1, 2005 -> 11:01 AM) Then the US better get moving. This $2.29 a gallon crap is getting out of hand. More oil isn't the solution; alternative fuels is what will keep oil prices down. I've done a lot of research into the "oil problem" and more oil will have little to no effect on future prices. As of right now about 25% of U.S power plants are run on oil (only 8% on nuclear power), build more nuclear power plants, invest in solar, wind and geothermal power. Finally there's nothing like a fuel efficient car, if everyone was getting 40 miles to the gallon we wouldn't have this problem.
-
QUOTE(NUKE_CLEVELAND @ Apr 30, 2005 -> 05:06 PM) That's what I never understood about the whole "war for oil" argument. Iraq produces, on its best day, about 2 million barrels of oil. That's peanuts compared to nations like Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and even Iran. If you really wanted to talk about a war for oil the correct place to look was the first Gulf War and that's because Saddam Hussein was poised to sieze most of it in the gulf region. Iraq might not have the capabilities to produce large amounts of oil now, but the Iraq oil reserves are supposed to be over 100 billion barrels. Thats second only to Saudi Arabia, so there's plenty money to be made off Iraqi oil.
-
Sox @ A'ss Game Thread (4/25 @ 9:05 p.m. CT)
mac9001 replied to Jabroni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
QUOTE(toasty @ Apr 25, 2005 -> 10:57 PM) has anyone seen a pitch count for garland? 106 after 8. -
Sox @ A'ss Game Thread (4/25 @ 9:05 p.m. CT)
mac9001 replied to Jabroni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
QUOTE(Soxnbears01 @ Apr 25, 2005 -> 10:48 PM) "Go Bulls" Hawk is certainly on crack tonight. Yeah, but it's a good kind of crack -
I thought Aaron was gonna plow the catcher. Still haven't seen a decent home plate collision this year.
-
QUOTE(Kalapse @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 10:28 PM) I feel this is a key here. People were not criticizing Crede after only a few games they were criticizing him after 2 full seasons of below expectation play. It a new season, the guy should be given a chance. I don't get how you can count a guy out after 5 games, like many people seemed to have done. You know what, I'm gonna stop arguing his point, sit back, drink a beer and enjoy a Sox win. Who cares, the Sox are 13-4 and isn't that what really matters.
