Everything posted by CaliSoxFanViaSWside
-
If Ozzie benched Swish for Wise
QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Aug 28, 2009 -> 10:40 AM) I think someone could question why Dye stayed in the 3 spot of the lineup for so long, but there is no way the Sox are going to bench a guy whose produced like Jermaine has over the past few years. He's healthy and in a funk, but when he gets out of it, he'll get out of it big and he might damn well carry the Sox to a surprising post-season birth. Stop making sense.
-
White Sox/Red Sox
OVA !
-
White Sox/Red Sox
QUOTE (sin city sox fan @ Aug 27, 2009 -> 05:46 PM) I hope Jenks can get a save this evening....I need one out of him for my fantasy league. So you're advocating the Red Sox pull within 3 runs ?
-
White Sox/Red Sox
QUOTE (BigEdWalsh @ Aug 27, 2009 -> 05:34 PM) Ahhh, but they're timeless. Conquistador = classic . Speaking of which i hit a thrift store today and found a Zager and Evans album ( In the Year 2525). Had to get it.
-
White Sox/Red Sox
QUOTE (WilliamTell @ Aug 27, 2009 -> 05:11 PM) Yeah let's not call it quite yet. I love the 7-0 score though. Why not ? It happens enough when we're down by 1 run in here.
-
White Sox/Red Sox
Red Sox pitcher being left in to die.
-
White Sox/Red Sox
Q !!! 7-0 this game is ova !
-
Tony Pena pitches floating fastballs
How many players have Soxtalkers released or DFA'ed this year ?
-
Sox vs. Sawks 8-26-09 Gavin 10-8 3.98 vs. Wake 11-3 4.31
Butkus K's.
-
Sox vs. Sawks 8-26-09 Gavin 10-8 3.98 vs. Wake 11-3 4.31
Hard to hit that 100MPH heater square.
-
Sox vs. Sawks 8-26-09 Gavin 10-8 3.98 vs. Wake 11-3 4.31
Shock us all JD.
-
Sox vs. Sawks 8-26-09 Gavin 10-8 3.98 vs. Wake 11-3 4.31
QUOTE (DaveBrown85 @ Aug 26, 2009 -> 06:29 PM) thanks just turned the game back on. Thought they took out nix for him straight up And Pods hit the PH HR after Wakefield was gone.
-
Sox vs. Sawks 8-26-09 Gavin 10-8 3.98 vs. Wake 11-3 4.31
QUOTE (PeavyTime @ Aug 26, 2009 -> 06:27 PM) Anyone who thought Thome would do anything but K need to get their head examined...Thome can't make contact with anything over 93 mph Hindsight is 20/20.
-
Sox vs. Sawks 8-26-09 Gavin 10-8 3.98 vs. Wake 11-3 4.31
QUOTE (nastymasty21 @ Aug 26, 2009 -> 06:12 PM) ok i think we will win this game...im gonna try being optimistic for a change...lets go AJ!! DIdn't you already say ballgame after the Gonzalez HR ?
-
Sox vs. Sawks 8-26-09 Gavin 10-8 3.98 vs. Wake 11-3 4.31
No bunting.
-
Sox vs. Sawks 8-26-09 Gavin 10-8 3.98 vs. Wake 11-3 4.31
Bard will be in shortly.
-
Sox vs. Sawks 8-26-09 Gavin 10-8 3.98 vs. Wake 11-3 4.31
Beckham's gotta be thrilled Wakefield is gone.
-
Sox vs. Sawks 8-26-09 Gavin 10-8 3.98 vs. Wake 11-3 4.31
Pods !!
-
Sox vs. Sawks 8-26-09 Gavin 10-8 3.98 vs. Wake 11-3 4.31
Wakefield won't be back this inning.
-
Sox vs. Sawks 8-26-09 Gavin 10-8 3.98 vs. Wake 11-3 4.31
Probably the 1st time in his life Beckham has seen a knuckleball.
-
Sox vs. Sawks 8-26-09 Gavin 10-8 3.98 vs. Wake 11-3 4.31
QUOTE (Brian @ Aug 26, 2009 -> 05:19 PM) You can see with our mind set against Wakefield, we won't score another run off him. Alexi takes a big long pull hack and nubs it to 1st. $20 says we do.
-
Sox vs. Sawks 8-26-09 Gavin 10-8 3.98 vs. Wake 11-3 4.31
QUOTE (The Ginger Kid @ Aug 26, 2009 -> 05:17 PM) I should record Sox situational hitting so i have something to induce vomiting should my kids ever swallow poison. That was good.
-
Sox vs. Sawks 8-26-09 Gavin 10-8 3.98 vs. Wake 11-3 4.31
Gavin is throwing some hard breaking stuff tonight . Just filthy.
-
Sox vs. Sawks 8-26-09 Gavin 10-8 3.98 vs. Wake 11-3 4.31
QUOTE (tommy @ Aug 26, 2009 -> 01:30 PM) Nix 2B Beckham 3B Pierzynski C Konerko 1B Thome DH Dye RF Quentin LF Rios CF Ramirez SS Gavin 'The Stopper' Floyd on the mound. Oz really shaking things up now ! Q didn't last long at # 3.
-
the OFFICIAL this team is really frustrating me thread
QUOTE (Thunderbolt @ Aug 25, 2009 -> 08:24 PM) I’m sorry. I know there’s a difference between being a fan of the game and a student of the game, but taking issue with both these things is both petty and absurd. Then you misunderstood the point of my post. Those things have their place but my point was that people get a lil too angry and tend to lash out rather than read a post a few times getting its full meaning before they respond. There's lot of lurkers who probably would like to contribute more but don't because in reality people are much braver on a message board then they would be face to face .