nitetrain8601

QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Dec 13, 2005 -> 10:18 PM) I just don't like the deal at all. I am weary of trading Garland. Think about what happened to PK before last season. They had a deal but he declined because he wanted to test the free-agent waters. Nothing was said during the season. We win the WS and he re-signs without a hitch. Hopefully the case is the same with Garland. Um, The White Sox were the ones who wanted to wait for the offseason to resign PK. And if you don't call what just happened in the offseason prior to us resigning PK a hitch, then I don't know what your definition would be. People don't realize that the Angels were pretty close in getting PK. Garland is a pitcher. An average pitcher these days demands 10 million. Garland will surely get 12 million.

Guess what guys, I finished mine last week. And 1 of them sucked horribly.

QUOTE(3 BeWareTheNewSox 5 @ Dec 13, 2005 -> 08:48 PM) Well Riley, the jerk store called, and they're running out of you Why so much hate for Riley?

QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Dec 13, 2005 -> 08:44 PM) I do not want Vazquez...thats what that means. Well you're not Kenny GM.

QUOTE(WSFAN35 @ Dec 13, 2005 -> 08:35 PM) If there is any validation to the rumors that Garland might be traded, the entire league would be making offers to get their hands on him. He's probably the best pitcher available via trade in a thin free agent market. Why would Kenny accept a Vazquez for Garland AND Young when he could get a much better deal elsewhere. I feel a package like Garland and Young could snag the equivalent of Vazquez, Tracy, and a prospect. Well the White Sox would have to get pitching for pitching. That eliminates more than half the teams in the league. Now he has to get a pitcher with upside or who he thinks would be great with Cooper. Now cut that number in half as well. Next he has to find someone who would give them flexibility. That leaves maybe 3 or 4 teams.

QUOTE(fathom @ Dec 13, 2005 -> 08:26 PM) So the pitching staff gets older, more expensive, and worse? I think that's the reason for the 25 page thread. Vazquez is only 3 years older. Garland is very young, but Vazquez is entering his prime(or should be). With Coop, I think Vazquez will do things Garland could only dream of. And Garland will probably be more expensive than Vazquez and have a much longer deal which is why we would be dealing him.

SportsChannel was better!

QUOTE(White Sox Josh @ Dec 13, 2005 -> 07:45 PM) I would do the 3yr/$30M deal. What the hell is the difference? Oh would he not be able to feed his family. If i were him I would want to be in a place where I have a real chance to win a Championship. But you're not him. He's going to want more than 10 million.

Garland for Vazquez - Get It Done Kenny unless Garland resigns within the next day or two.

QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Dec 13, 2005 -> 05:49 PM) Is Steven Drew available? I think Conor Jackson is

Eric Moulds is probably going to be released from what I just heard on ESPN.

They'll probably have Aireese Currie on the roster. If they sign Peerless Price, I'd be shocked.

Can anyone give me info on Group D?

QUOTE(greasywheels121 @ Dec 13, 2005 -> 04:39 PM) That is even worse. That signals Frank to Minnesota or Frank to Cleveland.

If it's Garland for Javy straight up, I'd do it simply because of flexibility. If they want more thrown in on our part, they're on crack.

QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Dec 13, 2005 -> 12:28 AM) I try. I just don't see the connection. But whatever, It's cuz I'm bored out of my mind. Understandably so. Not much has happened in the past week.

QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Dec 12, 2005 -> 11:17 PM) Yes, I know, but he refers to McCarthy and Jenks...both of which came from the Sox minors. It just doesnt fit to me. If he wanted to talk about additions to the 2005 season, why didnt he mention AJ or Pods or Duke or Dye? That's nitpicking at its finest.

I haven't gotten any noticeable differences at all. Most of the time, however, I download the ISO file from a torrent and burn it straight to the DVD since it's way less of a hassle. Takes longer though.

Oh yeah, because who the hell would want to spend more time with their family? That crazy bastard!

Guide. All the programs it tells you to use are free IIRC. http://www.dvdr-digest.com/articles/18_1.html

QUOTE(Chisoxfn @ Dec 11, 2005 -> 04:25 PM) Umm, they gave up 21 and were dominate the entire game. Points aren't the only sign. The Bears got clocked and if the weather was better and they weren't just closing the game out by stalling, they could have scored more. Offensively we had no chance at winning this game. You all are idiots to think that we can win a shootout, we can't. Not with Orton, not with Grossman. Unless we have Peyton or Farve or another top QB we aren't going to do that. Were not built around that. Thats like asking a Hummer to win the Indy 500, it won't happen. A hummer could win some off-road challenge though. We need to play our game and when our defense isn't doing is job we have no chance. Plain and simple and there is nothing the Bears can do about that. It doens't have the personel to be a high scoring offense and it won't win high scoring games (unless the defense is getting us field position and the offense takes advtange of the short field). Since when is 21 points a shootout?

I agree with Hammerhead on everything minus AI and that's very hard to do because me and HHJ never agree on anything basketball related.

Artest also plays SG. In fact I think he starts at SG and Jackson at SF. Orlando could stick him there if they were able to trade for him. Here's what I said about him on the Bulls board:

QUOTE(Punch and Judy Garland @ Dec 10, 2005 -> 06:05 PM) He didnt do much to help us win the Series. Nothing more than a replacement player at DH would have done Everett was one of our more consistant players in the playoffs.

I also live by Crestwood. Excellent.