bmags

Isn't that still the medical teams fault?

what can you even say at this point? But at very least it has been a decade of extremely shitty medical situations that bulls continuously throw up their hands.

but I will anyway...people complain about the length of college football games a LOT.

There are so many reasons why the football stuff is such a bad comparison I don't even know which one to pick.

I agree. I think bears are interested and the thought wil lbe "you can't teach just being a giant human who has already shown they know how to use hands"

This draft class is so loaded at RB too

I honestly don't have time that's why you all had to read that scribe which I could do in 5 minutes rather than hours of him yelling at me and then probably finding my phone and yelling at me.

I'm gonna do the thing where I create a man from straw by condensing thousands of individual peoples opinions into one I like to shoot down, so I know I'm just annoyed on line but The orlando brown stuff is annoying me. Greg Gabriel in typical condescending fashion talks about how stupid fans are for wanting Orlando Brown because he's not a scheme fit. So team scheme fit has circled two names - mcglinchey and mcgary, with McGary the new OT du jour. I'm not opposed per se. But the thing with McGary is the falcons had more run sets than the Bears did last year. They protected their OTs in pass sets as much as the bears did. So what you see with McGary is an OT that is an exceptional run tackle but an ok pass pro guy, improved but not great. He's like Braxton jones at RT. Except we hope Jones gets better while McGary is now 28. Was what we didn't like about Larry Borom that he wasn't good enough at run blocking? PFF grades pass blocking at equal to McGary. Now McGlinchey has the same problem, it's just that he was not in an offense that was protecting their tackles as much. So we know he can provide adequate pass blocking when they aren't doing so much to protect him. But those are bears scheme fits. And apparently this group sees the chicago bears as prioritizing the run heavy stuff they did last year and not trying to normalize that a bit with being able to pass on non-obvious downs. But I feel like the same group also wants the bears to improve passing. If you only want the bears to do what they did last year with an even better run blocking RT...Kaleb McGary is for you. No Jawaan Taylor is the inverse. He is young and I haven't not heard he's a scheme fit. He was great at Pass Pro but bad at running. The Jags passed a lot, and he was good at it. I'd much rather try that out. But then you have Brown, who also was in an offense that passed a lot, and opponents tried to stop the pass, and they could not get around his massive arms. Apparently we don't need that because we need to run. The smart people know we just need to focus exclusively on optimizing the bears run, put all pass improvements on Justin. I hate it.

Right and sounds like it's structured for the biggest hit to be this year. Does seem like a good place for an Anthony Richardson to go.

I guess I disagree. Is any team without burrow or mahomes going anywhere? He was good in the playoffs against the NFCs best defense, much better than Dak. He’s one of the more efficient passers, and next year will have Kenneth Walker fully involved all year. With a rebuild front end on defense, I don’t see why they can’t do what eagles are doing now.

That’s not an overpay…pretty on target. And only 3 years too, it’s a good deal.

I do love Brown. I think it’s under discussed how even though Jones didn’t fail, he was not tasked with a lot in pass pro. Brown the second half of the season had no problems shutting people down.

Orlando Brown will make it to FA. Huge news. Not sure if bears like him or not, but it’s good news regardless.

I don’t think colts giving two top first rounders for one pick is realistic, but if it happens…poles is a king.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2023/03/06/ryan-poles-chicago-bears-nfl-combine-draft-peter-king-fmia/ the full article here. Really enjoyable.

tons of bears news just highlighting there may be early movement. Big Peter King feature today, and rappoport/pft articles all pushing same narrative.

Just depends on picks. Getting a future first to move down 3 spots, and an early second this year, adds a lot of flexibility. You can trade that future first for a big time receiver, or maybe walk out of next years draft with 2 first round talents. You can use the early second this year to begin trading back and accumulating picks, or have more flexibility to trade for Hopkins. They both add a lot of flexibilty. I think colts may still be pressed next year to be too good, esp compared to a carolina, so I'd rather get a future first from them. They need to get a future 1. But even if they trade back a lot, they may be valuing future 1s more than loading up in current class.

I don’t think there is a world where we can get two picks in the vicinity of those two unless we got 2, 12 from Houston and presumably traded back from 2 as well.

Everyone know spring training for pitchers is when they are finished products

Ouuuuutttmaaaannnnnn

Informing us of yahoo news updates ?

Thoughts: - Disappointed how easy that was for red bull - Williams was way better than I expected, and sargeant was solid - mclaren …jesus - 2nd place will likely be more interesting than first in constructors

Bryce young put on a lot of weight, basically weighed in at same measurable (height, weight) as kyler murray

Very good video by chuck

Stupid slacky mods not pinning smdh