Jump to content

bmags

Admin
  • Posts

    62,014
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    148

Everything posted by bmags

  1. Right and sounds like it's structured for the biggest hit to be this year. Does seem like a good place for an Anthony Richardson to go.
  2. I guess I disagree. Is any team without burrow or mahomes going anywhere? He was good in the playoffs against the NFCs best defense, much better than Dak. He’s one of the more efficient passers, and next year will have Kenneth Walker fully involved all year. With a rebuild front end on defense, I don’t see why they can’t do what eagles are doing now.
  3. That’s not an overpay…pretty on target. And only 3 years too, it’s a good deal.
  4. I do love Brown. I think it’s under discussed how even though Jones didn’t fail, he was not tasked with a lot in pass pro. Brown the second half of the season had no problems shutting people down.
  5. Orlando Brown will make it to FA. Huge news. Not sure if bears like him or not, but it’s good news regardless.
  6. I don’t think colts giving two top first rounders for one pick is realistic, but if it happens…poles is a king.
  7. https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2023/03/06/ryan-poles-chicago-bears-nfl-combine-draft-peter-king-fmia/ the full article here. Really enjoyable.
  8. tons of bears news just highlighting there may be early movement. Big Peter King feature today, and rappoport/pft articles all pushing same narrative.
  9. Just depends on picks. Getting a future first to move down 3 spots, and an early second this year, adds a lot of flexibility. You can trade that future first for a big time receiver, or maybe walk out of next years draft with 2 first round talents. You can use the early second this year to begin trading back and accumulating picks, or have more flexibility to trade for Hopkins. They both add a lot of flexibilty. I think colts may still be pressed next year to be too good, esp compared to a carolina, so I'd rather get a future first from them. They need to get a future 1. But even if they trade back a lot, they may be valuing future 1s more than loading up in current class.
  10. I don’t think there is a world where we can get two picks in the vicinity of those two unless we got 2, 12 from Houston and presumably traded back from 2 as well.
  11. Everyone know spring training for pitchers is when they are finished products
  12. Thoughts: - Disappointed how easy that was for red bull - Williams was way better than I expected, and sargeant was solid - mclaren …jesus - 2nd place will likely be more interesting than first in constructors
  13. Bryce young put on a lot of weight, basically weighed in at same measurable (height, weight) as kyler murray
  14. Stupid slacky mods not pinning smdh
  15. Vaughn 3 run homer. love watching spring baseball hours later in clip form on YouTube.
  16. I’ll never miss an opportunity to argue that the way we should always phrase this is “2 additional firsts and a second” with the assumption. Being that we swap a first already (hence trade down)
  17. Definitely at the time. But pre ASB that was about as fun as baseball could be considering we already won and didn't have to prove anything. That Iguchi game where he hit 3 home runs (but we still lost) was just so much of the type of fun we were having. Then just slow grinding performance loss.
  18. No. I’m sorry but this can’t keep happening. They can’t keep letting you get away with this.
  19. I think stuff like this is silly. No chain of highly picked qb failures was worse than the “Jeff tedford QBs” and then he produced Aaron rodgers. ohio st recruits great qb prospects and lets them throw deep to great receivers. But most QB prospects fail.
  20. The bears aren't unlucky because a generational talent is there, a QB like Caleb Williams appears to be is a once or twice a decade type guy, they would have been extremely lucky if that guy was there. This draft has 4 top ten qbs maybe. Last year or a 2013 type draft would have been unlucky.
  21. The QB class does not suck. The QB class last year sucked.
  22. From what it sounds like, they don't have the technology for full automation.
×
×
  • Create New...