bmags

QUOTE (GoSox05 @ Jan 15, 2015 -> 08:38 AM) This is all leading to the Bears signing Doug Marrone. These are good jokes except I'm starting to believe them.

Bulls give up 60 points in a half like nothing now. Unreal the lack of effort on D. I thought they'd be getting better now, they are tailspinning.

Incredibly disappointed in this team. Maybe barely a 50 win team in this crap conference.

I've not seen a contract on the table anywhere. Where are u seeing that?

QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jan 14, 2015 -> 05:12 PM) It would appear Fox is Chicago or bust right now and it would appear Bears are smarter than a lot of thought as their was significant back channeling that took place. That's all smoke right now, we have no idea. We have a media right now who just says "Bears could bring in Gase, now that he's not a HC" Is there reason to say that? No, but yes...they could!

We need MEN IN THE BATHROOMS

Maybe I'm crazy, but I prefer only top 4.

QUOTE (shipps @ Jan 14, 2015 -> 04:57 PM) You would think more would leak out after the interview than what has so far. Which is nothing pretty much. It's apparent that there is a huge lack of institutional sources with George running show and a new GM.

QUOTE (LDF @ Jan 14, 2015 -> 10:06 AM) no offense i was wondering why?? Really campy, the ending was like a child would write.

QUOTE (thxfrthmmrs @ Jan 14, 2015 -> 04:43 PM) Who knows, we're just playing theoretical matchups right now. Until they've proven they can't win when they are healthy, writing them off would be premature. Yeah totally. It's not even all star break. Last year we thought Portland was greatest team ever prior to then.

QUOTE (thxfrthmmrs @ Jan 14, 2015 -> 04:22 PM) They are good, but they aren't shutting down the firepower of Cleveland for 7 games kind of good. We aren't talking about the Pacers of the past 2 years, the 2011 Bulls, or the great Celtics or Pistons D of the past decade here. Meh, but their offense is better than those teams.

QUOTE (thxfrthmmrs @ Jan 14, 2015 -> 03:43 PM) They won't be winning playoff series with their defense, but their offense had a chance to be best in the league, and still does. It isn't like any of the top teams in the East are defensive juggernauts and could shut down their offense. Let's not forget they went on a 13-4 run before Lebron went down 2 weeks ago. Counting out a team with that much talent while they are just going through injuries is a little premature. Atlanta's D is pretty damn good.

Wow, SF hires their own DL coach to HC.

QUOTE (Jake @ Jan 14, 2015 -> 02:46 PM) The key question is whether a team can have a really, really bad season and it not be the coach's fault. Can a guy have some blemishes on his resume and that just be part of what happens when you coach for a long time or is it some proof that when certain circumstances aren't met, he's no good? It seems Fox has a good reputation for leading an orderly locker room, hiring bright assistants, and generally having his team perform up to expectations. He's had some fabulous teams in Denver, especially the last two years. Last year was the year to win it, and they almost did. This year would seem to have been just as prime time, but perhaps it was Peyton's injury that cost them. My feeling is that if you give John Fox a 13-3 team, he'll get them to go 13-3 just about every time. Sometimes he'll make an 8-8 team a couple games better. I don't see him being the driving force behind a bad team. If our problem is that the team only plays up to its talent level and merely makes the playoffs and usually wins there, we can cross that bridge when we get there. The only thing I'll say to that is 1) Tom Coughlin And 2) That 2010 Panthers team was really hung out to dry by their ownership in the CBA year. While others were loading up because "NO CAP!" they were doing the opposite and claiming poor to get a better deal. But to me, John Fox is basically Tom Coughlin level as a coach, and that's really good!

Man, WCG is in full meatball mode. I have to say, I have concerns that Fox does have a ceiling as a coach. It's clear that he, like apparently every coach, need talent to win. But he has excellent connections for assistants, can handle the team, and will put the team in position where if luck hits we can make a serious run. The arguments, thick with choking on their polish sausage neckfat, that he was only made because of Peyton Manning and the REAL John Fox is the 2-14 Panthers with Matt Moore and rookie Clausen at QB are just ridiculous.

I agree, Shanahan, with the exception of the decent Texans teams (Foster/A. Johnson), has not worked with great offensive talent. Last years browns were awful, not a single good RB, or good WR, or good QB. Under Hoyer, they were pretty good until all of his tendencies were countered.

QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jan 14, 2015 -> 10:33 AM) I would take him back. We need an extra insurance policy in our back court, imo. To be honest, I'd prefer a Keith Bogans to a Nate for our bench.

QUOTE (GoSox05 @ Jan 14, 2015 -> 10:57 AM) I would assume most of these teams that need a coach would really love to have Dan Quinn, but are just afraid to wait. I think he is by far the best candidate this year. He just might not be available for 3 or so weeks. Correct, really sucks not to have a coach in place that late when assistants start getting gobbled up, plus all-star games. I'd love to get Quinn.

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Jan 14, 2015 -> 10:26 AM) I think I would rather the Raiders job than the Jets job, all things considered, but both have been resolved at this juncture so it's a moot point. Raiders just have zero patience with coaches. They fire them every 2 years. They have a better roster than probably ever, at this point, but even still I'd just feel like you are a replaceable cog that they don't have much buy-in on since they roll through so many.

I do think it's one of the worst jobs available. I'd rate it Broncos 49ers Falcons Buffalo Bears Jets Raiders

QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Jan 14, 2015 -> 09:49 AM) I would say the dysfunction that Shanahan oversaw was tremendously worse than anything that Fox presided over. And even in the midst of infighting with Elway(which was really kept under wraps until about 4 days ago), he managed to go 12-4 and get a first round bye. I would be tremendously disappointed if they went after leatherface. And to be clear, I like listening to Hub, but he is right as much as he is wrong. And even he will admit to that for the most part, a few of his most recent predictions were that Seattle was just another team (this was in November of 2013) and they wont make it out of the first round. I would really like to know though, when we read "Bears want to pair inexperienced GM with experienced Coach", if that is just lazy sports narrative who assume that is a pair that makes sense, or if they are hearing this from Accorsi/George/Ted.

QUOTE (knightni @ Jan 14, 2015 -> 07:05 AM) Now You See Me - 3 out of 5. Cool premise, decent rental, but it felt low budget. The "surprise" came out of nowhere and felt like sloppy screenwriting. Also, the ending was mediocre and vague. I would give that movie a 1 out of 5.

QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Jan 14, 2015 -> 09:27 AM) When was John Fox in Washington? Wow, sorry, I missed a sentence where Hub was questioning why Fox was better than Shannahan. Let me post the article http://m.chicagofootball.com/2015/01/14/hu...-bears/a8imkce/

So France threw 400 in jail for "defending terrorism".

QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Jan 14, 2015 -> 09:12 AM) Hub Arkush not wanting John Fox is one of the reasons I really want them to hire him. Hub is a dope. I thought Hub was too negative then he basically called the last two years being a failure, with a lack of talent that required a rebuild, and trestman would fail.