bmags

And anyway “taking on salary while looking for OF help” sounds like a team trying to work with the dodgers who are offloading much shorter term deals.

Man I wish J4L would make an appearance again for this bulls season

If you guys would anticipate this article would have any information on Sox and Harper based on this tweet from nightengale, you would be wrong.

If I was Harper I’d want to fulfill the dreams of a tired adult man who posts on a baseball web site, and I don’t see why mlbn doesn’t represent this viewpoint.

Hey instead of a fireworks grand finale let’s just shoot one firework per hour over next 30 days. Enjoy everyone.

Yeah maybe not to the team but to the fans it would be a lot more fun to have a flurry of activity. People like the trade deadline! What if we got rid of that? It doesn’t really matter, players could move whenever. but it’s fun! Fans having fun can be a consideration.

I’m totally on your side.

I could definitely see DiPoto taking on Heyward for Happ fully confident that he could spin off Heyward only to have to trade something more valuable than Happ to get it done.

As long as there is a DiPoto in this world.

Hear hear

That Heyman article was the most pro harper to the sox thing i've read. Everyone that was at the meetings was abuzz about the sox making a move, on this forum it's straight panic. Cubs will try to clear salary because the cubs need to clear salary. And I'm sure they will offer the highest AAV they can for like a 4-5 year deal. But I don't think that does anything. But it may! Because Harper is a human with power to make a decision.

Is playing with your brother-in-law an attraction?

I don't think you need that much lead time to print stuff. For instance, the tribune prints a bunch of newspapers for delivery at 5 am starting at 1145 the night before.

And honestly I agree with Heyman (surprise! I agree with someone who confirms my desired outcome) The shedding of salary from the Dodgers has been marginal. In a trade where they shed salary and outfielders (cincy) it was largely a wash that they ended up largely buying prospects. They have paid for a new reliever. If anything this is just clearing out a glut that may have been requested by Dave Roberts that it was too hard to manage that many major leaguers. None of the salaries discussed provide gigantic flexibility.

Surprised this didn't generate much more chatter. Was much more pessimistic on the Dodgers stuff.

He's also in his last year of Arb though isn't he?

They would need to value this person more than their own players just off the 40 man so it's clear they still have some liking for the players in AAA left off.

This seems pretty cheap

Man he's bad at breaking news.

okay this pisses me off edit: whoa, sorry, I thought rangers traded off their rule 5 pick for a comp balance pick. THat was not the case!

Come on this is taking it too far. THey have option to just not take a player. They are instead taking advantage of position to get something out of it. They've had pretty good success with the minor league rule 5, but the major league one requires a spot they may not want to guarantee with all the youth coming up.

It's okay. Clearly with sox stash of players in AAA they don't want to be hamstrung with really a 24 man roster, so they are using their position for cash at this point.

he's been wrong before.

Wow #actually Encarnacion to TB

If that's the cost of a comp balance pick i hope we buy some, esp if we are to lose our 2nd rounders.