Jump to content

RockRaines

Members
  • Posts

    43,333
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RockRaines

  1. QUOTE (IlliniKrush @ Apr 25, 2011 -> 11:29 AM) That's not at all what the debate was/is about. Just pointing out how they weren't identical.
  2. And as crazy as it gets on this board during sox losses, at least we aren't into conspiracies. http://forum.canucks.com/forum/24-canucks-talk/
  3. QUOTE (kjshoe04 @ Apr 25, 2011 -> 11:16 AM) Thank you for being rational. They are almost identical hits. Except seabs didn't have the puck, which is why it was a penalty.
  4. Paul was nails last night, love to see them knock off the lakers.
  5. Lol espn. "breaking news on Ohio state and Jim Tressel, new allegations, and th FBI is involved. Let's bring in the writer from the dispatch" "actually nothing new, the self reported allegations were confirmed by the NCAA, and the FBI phone call was actually a conversation unrelated with a players parent" "oh. Well here's some spring game action"
  6. Limitless just seemed to be about a guy on coke.
  7. Taylor Graham from Wheaton had a good spring game. He and Braxton Miller look to be the two favorites to start.
  8. QUOTE (Real @ Apr 23, 2011 -> 03:48 PM) congrats, Bulls win in 5. Too bad they're getting bounced in the 2nd round. By Whom?
  9. QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Apr 22, 2011 -> 01:40 PM) If you're getting baked I'd suggest either Hanna or Source Code which are both playing there. Gotcha, I was thinking Source Code as well, or limitless.
  10. QUOTE (The Ginger Kid @ Apr 22, 2011 -> 01:32 PM) Exactly. Did you see what he was using for collateral on that loan from Fox? The expected settlement on a lawsuit he has against the firm who drew up his prenup! The guy's a mess. Did you see how he made his "fortune?" A parking lot.
  11. QUOTE (Tex @ Apr 22, 2011 -> 05:32 AM) If we pool all of our Soxtalk resources, think we could buy the Dodgers? We could run it my committee, we'd win a WS every year. If someone like Mark Zuckerberg cared even a little about sports the Dodgers could be a great franchise. They have the popularity and the history, a little money and ingenuity would go a long way.
  12. QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Apr 22, 2011 -> 01:24 PM) If Win Win is still out I'd go with that. My options are whatever is being shown at the Icon on Roosevelt. I'm thinking get baked and watch your highness.
  13. A-Team Not bad. Going to the movies tonight, what should I see?
  14. See, I dont like that data sitting on a remote server since they have to save that data for a longer period of time since they are a public company. Its even backed up on tapes in a vault somewhere.
  15. QUOTE (whitesoxfan101 @ Apr 22, 2011 -> 12:26 PM) Yeah. Not only do I want to see the Hawks win this series since it'd be an epic 3-0 comeback and would stick it to the Canucks, but also because the Hawks can beat anybody if they can do this. And while you're right about the Hawks showing their true colors and some of the elite guys stepping up, I don't think it's a coincidence at all that Dave Bolland comes back, and all of a sudden the Canucks can't score and are doing stupid s***. Dave Bolland is not only one of the best defensive fowards in hockey, he's one of the best pests in it. Also, in referrence to another post earlier, I honestly don't even hate the Red Wings that much. I put them in the category of the Twins: A team I have a lot of respect for whom there is no real reason for me to hate other than they're really good and beat my team. I hate teams like the Blues, Canucks, and Pacers a lot more since they're just plain dirty. I agree 100% on your last point. Any hatred towards the Wings at least in my lifetime is because they have been the poster child for success. The Blues, Canucks and even Flyers I hate because of the way they play and especially their fans.
  16. QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Apr 22, 2011 -> 11:37 AM) Someone must have told Jeff Foster to impersonate Bill Laimbeer, because that is what he is doing. Im glad the Bulls havent been rising to the bait for the most part, but most of his fouls have been borderline flagrant with his follow through and it hasnt been called once. I didnt think of it until ESPN mentioned it this morning, Indiana has re-instituted the "Jordan Rules" for Rose.
  17. QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Apr 22, 2011 -> 11:23 AM) Have you visited Pale Hose Talk recently? It's unbearable... and similar. The difference with Canucks fans is its almost always something other than their team. Refs, Bettman, the other team cheating. No other pro team has a statue of a coach complaining to the refs outside of their stadium like the Nucks do.
  18. QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Apr 22, 2011 -> 11:19 AM) There are plenty of stupid Blackhawks fans. Picking some dumb posts by idiots on another board is pointless and does not represent their fan base as a whole. Then ignore my posts, I find it funny. And its a LARGE portion of their board, which is why its even funnier.
  19. QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Apr 22, 2011 -> 10:23 AM) I don't understand why you are so obsessed with posters from other message boards. It's so simple to avoid what they are typing, and way more simple to not give a s***. Because its funny and Canucks fans are stupid.
  20. RockRaines

    2011 TV Thread

    Yeah, i cheered out loud when Landry hit that 46 yard field goal.
  21. QUOTE (Athomeboy_2000 @ Apr 22, 2011 -> 09:47 AM) being a turtle would be a nice life style, but I think I'd rather be a honey badger Honey badger doesnt give a s***.
  22. Refs handed the game to the Hawks with no offsides calls on Hossa. FYI
  23. QUOTE (Felix @ Apr 21, 2011 -> 10:46 PM) Paul is a better player right now than Rose because he's more efficient, is a better distributer and is a difference maker on defense. Not because he's a better three point shooter than Rose is. Lol, terrible. You should throw in the words "pure point guard" to make your point even worse. Go ahead and rank the top 5 NBA players right now, I'd love to see this mess. Sorry I'll stop. Everyone can have their opinions no matter how in the minority you may be.
  24. QUOTE (chw42 @ Apr 21, 2011 -> 10:42 PM) Nobody is dissecting 3 point shooting percentage to prove Paul is better than Rose. It's parts of Rose's game that he could improve on and shot selection is one of them. If he is as aggressive in the first 40 minutes of the game as he is in the last 8, this argument wouldn't be happening, because Derrick Rose would clearly be the best player in the NBA. Actually that's exactly what's happening, pay attention and read the post above you. Trying to prove Paul is better than Rose, which is literally retarded. There isn't one gm in the NBA who would agree.
×
×
  • Create New...