southsider2k5

EAT IT SAMMY

QUOTE(MurcieOne @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 02:16 PM) they could tattoo it on my buttocks if they wanted... i'd stand pants down tied to the wall - again if they wanted..... he's that good. Just becareful when the Cubs come to play here... just sayin.

6-1 lead for the Sox, 6 outs for the pen to go...

QUOTE(MurcieOne @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 02:12 PM) For Sure... without a doubt. 35 is the best player to ever put on the silver and black. The day Frank retires, is the day they figure out where to put his number. He will have his number retired the first year he is out of the game.

QUOTE(Soxpranos @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 02:10 PM) Called situational baseball, takes a little thinking. As opposed to thinking about having an absoultely helpless bunter, bunt? Yeah that makes sense.

QUOTE(qwerty @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 02:08 PM) ... with joe crede? That always sounds like a smart move to me. That way he could have popped into a triple play instead.

To be honest with the vilification of Bush I never realized how many President's used this tool, and to the huge extent that some President's used it, even so far as one President using it to put 3 Supreme Court justices on the bench, including a Head Justice. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...0100476_pf.html

Neal Cotts on to pitch the 7th for the Sox.

QUOTE(YASNY @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 01:39 PM) Baltimore knew it was coming and would have done the same thing. No reason to clear the benches. No reason to clear the benches... just saying what it takes to get a suspension. Besides the more this series goes on, the more the O's look like they are ready to throw in the towel.

QUOTE(qwerty @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 01:36 PM) No way he is suspended. How many times have you seen a pitcher get suspended because they got kicked out fo a game before a warning was even issused? The only way we would have seen suspensions if Baltimore cared enough to clear the benches and throw punches.

QUOTE(Steff @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 01:30 PM) GMAFB... the first thing out of nearly every poster in this thread was "bulls***.. there goes the streak..." not "yea.. way to go Mark!!" Don't tell me the streak is not of concern.. it's in black and white in this thread. :rolly The streak is a concern to the stat-heads on this site, and that's about it. As far as Mark is concerned, making sure his teammates don't have bullseyes on their backs is more important than how many innings he pitches.

QUOTE(whitesoxfan13 @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 01:29 PM) So was it intentional or not? Intentional no doubt about it.

QUOTE(Steff @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 01:23 PM) So be it. I don't. Not when the streak is on the line if he or Ozzie cared about it. He could have waited one more inning. No sympathy from me. It goes to show that Mark Buehrle is a great teammate, streak be damned. Mark cared more about standing up for AJ and Tadahito vs his own personal accomplishments. The team obviously comes first to him, and I respect him for that.

QUOTE(Dick Allen @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 01:23 PM) Why would you retaliate with a lefty up and a runner on first? The umpire is just wrong here. This is a result of Ozzie popping off in his press conference yesterday, make no mistake about it. The situation didn't make sense, but watching the pitch and knowing MB's control, there is no doubt that was on purpose. None.

QUOTE(Steff @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 01:21 PM) And what for..? Some silly retaliation. Heaven for bid the Sox take the high road. I like it honestly. You stand up for your own guys. You can't let your guys get hurt on purpose like that. Its the right thing to do.

QUOTE(TheBlackSox8 @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 01:20 PM) if the guy at second or first get out....the streak is still intact because they are buehrles runners....and only one more out is needed or so i think that's how it goes That's wrong. Whoever is pitching if those runners get out, gets credit for the outs. Buehrle's streak is OVER.

Wow. That was crap.

QUOTE(qwerty @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 01:01 PM) I hope the team suspends him for the rest of the year. And then some...

QUOTE(santo=dorf @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 12:50 PM) Levine reported that the Sox offered everything for Burnett and the Marlins still wouldn't part. On whitesox.com it was said that selling teams were asking for Buehrle, Garland, Marte, and Rowand. I'm willing to bet you wouldn't trade any of those 4 guys just for the sake of making a trade. And if you were, its a damned good thing that Kenny is our GM and not this guy.

QUOTE(robinventura23 @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 12:49 PM) Is this another case of tee off on a pitcher the night before and scraping for runs the next day? God, I hope not. This is the case of running into a good outing by a starting pitcher.

QUOTE(LosMediasBlancas @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 12:39 PM) So wtf was he taking then? That is one thing I don't agree with in this policy, neither side is allowed to say.

Surhoff JUST misses going yard off of MB, instead cruises into second with a one out double.

MB Ks Javy Lopez looking to end the 3rd. Sox and O's tied at one.

QUOTE(YASNY @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 12:13 PM) From what I understand, one of those pitchers the Tigers got is a stud. Would you have traded BMac for him? Maybe we have a Farnsworth quality in Jenks, maybe not. Is Farnsworth a lock down closer ... in Chicago? I think not. Jenks may very well be better for the Sox than we could ever hope for out of Farns. You also have to add in there that the Tigers probably wouldn't have much interest in helping out the White Sox.

They just said on the Bmore broadcast that Raffy is giving a 12:30 confrence call to the media.