caulfield12

Or Jerry Maguire....

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trumps-grade...-174201864.html Trump's Grade on the Economy Edges up to a B+ (article at yahoo written by a columnist who's constantly assaulted and trolled for being Leftist/Anti-Trump)

QUOTE (NCsoxfan @ Jun 5, 2017 -> 08:20 PM) Where do you get this 10% figure? Excluding HS players and focusing on higher floor players to fit a certain timeframe seems like a poor recipe over the long haul. 35 years of experience following baseball?

QUOTE (Brian @ Jun 5, 2017 -> 06:00 PM) F that souless bigot b**** http://www.ibtimes.com/katie-mchugh-breitb...-attack-2547699 Wow, I didn't even know who the hell she was until today. Yikes!!! And yet this is exactly the kind of stuff that wins elections and motivates the "base" to come out.

At any rate, it seems like all the recent concern at SoxTalk Land is migrating to Yoan Moncada.

And Giolito's going to have to clean up all those runners stealing at will. It's not like he's Hansen in his first full season. That won't work at the next level unless we have Willson Contreras behind the plate. (Yes, noted that he's working on mechanics/repertoire/command and control and not specifically focusing on the running game, per se.)

QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Jun 5, 2017 -> 07:35 PM) It's going to be seven hits soon with the caulfield jinx in play now. Yes, I tried to jinx Volquez's no hitter this weekend but it didn't work because he's an ex-Royal. (And actually the Marlins winning those games were positives for the Sox in the reverse standings.)

The first two innings were "shaky" in terms of just watching it as online play by play...but apparently none of the hits were blistered. That's the problem with trying to analyze anything without at least listening to the announcers or hopefully watching with your own eyes.

QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Jun 5, 2017 -> 07:34 PM) Seven hits? WTF are you talking about? See post above.

Well, I'm not sure how 7 hits in 4 innings is "great/excellent" but if you're actually watching the game and have seen all those balls put into play, I'll have to take your word for it...rather than going by the MILB.com play by play. (NOTE: I misread 7 k's as 7 hits, my mistake...so I'll retract my criticism, at this point we have to be elated if starters in the minors can get through 5 innings)

QUOTE (raBBit @ Jun 5, 2017 -> 05:56 PM) That's not it at all. There's next to no one here defending Trump on his verbal barfing unless the left goes too far. Let's not forget you're the one that went into PHT and made a whole list about SoxTalk with three points directed at me personally and my political views. Therein lies the problem...everything SEEMS directed at you because you're one of the few defending Trump. Drunkbomber? Greg, who does it more to get at Hillary moreso than supporting Trump? Jenks? There are maybe five of you. Most of the mods who lean Republican are probably privately more aghast but it's easy just to make jokes about the whole Trump presidency as a coping mechanism and hope the world isn't destroyed in the process. I'll put it this way. You're a smart enough guy to figure this out. Winning arguments in life (or the internet) is as much about personality and coming across in a likeable way, instead of being polarizing or alienating people. I'm not sure if you care about "winning friends" here, but you do seem to take the criticism pretty personally (for example, threatening Soxbadger for "stalking" you with his Seth Rich retorts into other threads)....and that seems EXACTLY like something Donald Trump would do. You defend yourself vociferously, but often mention you don't have the time like those who post more frequently (for me, it's simply a matter of being the opposite time zone 13 hours removed from Chicago time and the fact that we've only had exam invigilation for the past six weeks and summer vacation looming FRI), and then make that seem like an insult to those who do want to invest more time into these issues or in substantive policy discussion in general (yet Kathy Griffin threads get many more hits, I'm sure you've noticed). Now you're decrying not enough discussion of those issues which liberals might agree with you, but what would that discussion look like, exactly? I'll just say this. For every Chris Rongey or all the d--ks at The Score like Abbatacola who turned on Hawk when it was convenient, there are genuine "good guys" (in sports media/journalism) like Dave Wills and John Rooney and a bevy of others. Hopefully you end up on this side of the equation, and not the former.

Typical mixed results for Giolito so far. 4 k's so far, but also a walk and 4 hits....lots of stolen base attempts (see Hansen), but was fortunately bailed out with two caught stealings/runners picked off. Lots of pitches thrown. And there's another walk, his 2nd. That WHIP number is simply not going to be sustainable at the next level. Somehow, the ERA has lowered to 5.26 but it has been fairly ugly going to get there.

Haseley's going to go 6-9 according to nearly everyone, correct? Hostetler hyped Beck a lot, smokescreen to draw attention off Kendall? The problem with THAT particular theory is that nearly everyone is baseball knows we're after him, and unless the A's took him at 6th, he's quite likely to be there for the White Sox to take at 11th. No matter what the tool package, kids at the high school level with that much hype pan out about 10% of the time. Guys like Smith and to a lesser extent Haseley...did they peak this year? How well will their power translate with wooden bats at corner positions (LF/RF and 1B). With the insurance of Robert already in the fold, it does seem that you at least have the option to take the higher floor/lower ceiling choice in a Pavin Smith, but it's still highly unlikely either of those options are there. As we've already gone through with Rodon/Fulmer and all of our pitching prospects (up and downs), taking Faedo at 11 when he's only throwing 90-92 is scary as heck. Having Robert AND Kendall, the odds are super high at least one of them makes it, if not both.

QUOTE (raBBit @ Jun 5, 2017 -> 05:37 PM) I'll respond to the part that sort of stayed on subject. That thread was incredible and an exception to the rule around here. I don't know why more of the usual left wingers didn't come to war for you. Maybe they really are against discriminatory practice, but if you want my honest opinion, if you and Reddy are going to be the ones spearheading an argument, it's going to have to be a really good argument for people to get behind you on it. The other thing with that thread was that people who never post back here had came to post it. Maybe they have been shafted by affirmative action, maybe they wish they had help for college/employment on a basis of their family income but couldn't because they're white, I don't know. Really, the posters in there aren't the posters in the normal threads around here. People came out of the wood work for that one. So you just answered the point of all this sniping back and forth today...culminating in the sidewinding diatribe above. Truly consider if what you post (CNN stuff today) is compelling enough to get any of those who joined in that discussion to jump in with a comment or defense on your behalf. For example, PTAC is someone who rarely posts in the Filibuster and is about as moderate/level-headed as it gets, and he made a number of salient points. The reality is this board is just another reflection of the toxic atmosphere that exists between the White House and the media. Who gets the blame, I suppose historians can sort that out 50-75 years from now when enough time has passed to determine the effectiveness of tactics utilized on both sides of the divide.

QUOTE (raBBit @ Jun 5, 2017 -> 05:15 PM) I think a one word post is in no way of indicative of any method of communication I have ever been apart of but you know me better than me. What I understand, and you seemingly don't, is that people have political views that help shape their opinions. If you're in a certain camp, which you are, you see your beliefs as absolute truth. Just because you and the groupthink agree on 75%+ of the stuff posted doesn't mean you are right. You are compromised by ideology. You call my posts misleading, but the reality is you just disagree with me. Most of ours posts are opinion after all. Frankly, partisanship is voluntary hypocrisy. I don't partake in that. I don't need to call Trump on his s*** because Strange Sox and caulfield have already posted 12 links by 10 AM even if half of them have no regard for reality or an even handed take. That being said, I do like to represent the beliefs around here that are suppressed and offer an alternative take to the groupthink's cut-and-dried, intolerant universe. Now your response is that I am biased and right wing even if I won't admit it but it's not true in any case. My conservative friends call me a liberal all the time just as the groupthink here uses popularly used snarl words used to describe the right to malign my character instead of addressing the points that I make. I get characterized for what the majority of my posts are about here and that's fair. Since I have beliefs on both sides, I only have to express/defend the beliefs opposed to the groupthink. And they constantly attack and usually in a cheap, condescending or intolerant way. When I post about all the liberal social beliefs I have, no one responds. I am not in with the groupthink because of my economic views are very much on the right. When I posted about Trump spending ridiculous amounts of money on travel in February, nobody responded. When somebody who spends their whole workday in here posting links no one reads posts about Trump's travel costs in March it becomes a reoccuring topic. When I posted about prison reform and decriminalization of drugs and gay marriage and how I agree with Bernie Sanders almost uniformly as long as there's no money involved in the subject nobody responded to me. It's one post and the groupthink has already decided they won't have me, so they read, scroll past and d act like it never happened so they can call me Fox News or Breitbart or racist or whatever p**** tactic/canned response they use to shutdown conversation when they disagree with someone. If I say anything about the unfair media treatment to the right or HRC being a lifelong crook or the Obama blatant admin's criminal behavior, I could make a thread jump three pages in an hour with the outcry I get. So I get why you have an angle to character cast me and I would understand if the people who come in here in passing character casted me. I never have to defend my beliefs that fall under the liberal umbrella because there's no one here opposed to them. That being said, you are just being narrow-minded and condescending in your posts at me in thinking you're always right, you're evolved, you have the mental dexterity to look beyond your own worldview and I don't, etc. It's bulls***. You say this stuff and write off people who disagree with you as automatically wrong as if you're not doing exactly what you try to cast me as doing. We are giving opinions here. Other than caulfield, I don't really tell people they're wrong. I give my piece. I wish I could ignore people who come at me with such venom and not respond the same way but I haven't been able to in most cases. Such is talking politics. Here's the problem. Did Reddy and I attack everyone in the "white privilege" thread when we were outnumbered 8 to 1? If you were "objectively right" here, wouldn't those exact same posters be coming to your defense right now? In fact, I deliberately started that thread to elicit reactions from beyond just the ordinary posters here...and, in that sense, it succeeded in provoking reactions and even, at times, a constructive dialogue. If everyone agrees with something, they're not going to give you a like or congratulate you. If I assert as a liberal that school choice/charter schools have a place in education/al reform, should I also expect applause and plaudits? No way. You can't take the 10-15% of your posting here where you do attempt to be more nuanced and then hope those moments of honesty and candor will cover up the other 85% of Seth Rich and CNN manipulates/fake news/anti-Hillary & Obama stuff. That's just a different way of doing the same thing Greg does here, except Greg has a way of doing it in a more ambiguous way where you're really not sure if he's messing with you or sly like a fox.

QUOTE (GermanSock @ Jun 5, 2017 -> 04:29 PM) I posted the video here before. The baseball rebellion guy knows his stuff, he worked with many top amateurs and some pros. What other top prospects were they right on, before they became clear busts?

There's another problem with the leaking theories. The one in which the "deep state" Bannon is at perpetual war with is leaking in order with the express intention to remove Trump from power (or weaken him to the point where he'd be forced to resign) so that Mike Pence can be put in charge of the military/industrial complex and align with McCain/Lindsey Graham, etc., on foreign policy. This idea is just as credible (as Obama loyalists perpetrating it), because there's no split ticket where the Dems can insert their own VP into the line of presidential succession.

https://www.infowars.com/why-cnns-denial-th...-protest-is-bs/ If we can't take this "mainstream" reporting and objectively see the inherent bias at play, I don't know what to say. What can we all even agree is mainstream these days? No daily newspapers. Maybe USA Today? So...what, just Time, Newsweek and US News & World Report? The Christian Science Monitor? And C-Span, who still get attacked during Daily Journal for being biased towards the left when literally they go from Independent to Dem to a Republican in answering calls. Politico? Politifact? Realclearpolitics, but they just assemble articles from both sides of the spectrum.

http://www.milb.com/player/index.jsp?sid=m...itting/2017/ALL Hopefully he gets into his first action today...game should be about over.

QUOTE (raBBit @ Jun 5, 2017 -> 10:59 AM) https://twitter.com/kthopkins/status/871487298721992705 CNN staged scene to make it seems there was a protest. CNN has claimed Antro’s footage is misleading, telling Mediaite that the demonstrators were simply allowed through a police cordon at the CNN crew’s request, and that the demonstration was quite real. “This story is nonsense. The group of demonstrators that was at the police cordon was being allowed through by officers so they could show their signs to the gathered media. The CNN crew along with other media present simply filmed them doing so.” http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/230570

QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Jun 5, 2017 -> 06:48 AM) Nate Jones was a 5th rounder and drafted as a starter. Reed was a 2nd round reliever. Petricka was a starter as well. Well, Royce Ring and Aaron Poreda are lousy examples.

Trea Turner has a 710 ops right now...not nearly the dynamic offensive force he was over a half season last year. Benintendi at 755.

http://therunnersports.com/luis-robert-mlb...f-cesar-cedeno/ The second thing to notice is the imposing construction of both players’ otherwise “normal” right-handed baseball bodies. Robert and Cedeño (in his prime) have what seem to be steel bands for muscles, held together by tightly-wound, spring-loaded rubber bands, with BMIs that are likely around 22, if not lower. For both, this means a vicious bat speed generated by Hank Aaron-like wrist strength, and Roberto Clemente-like wall-reaching power to both alleys and beyond. Cedeño spent 12 years with the Astros (1970-1981), before spending 3 1/2 years in Cincinnati, and a year-and-a-half in Los Angeles, compiling a lifetime .285 BA, with 199 home runs. For the Astros, though, Cedeño (whom many, at the time, called the next Willie Mays) became the franchise’s first real offensive superstar, logging a .289 batting average in his dozen years in Houston, a .351 OBP, with an .805 OPS. He hit 163 homers wearing the orange rainbow, with most of those bombs hit into the dry, static atmosphere of the Astrodome, long before they brought the walls in. He stole 487 bases in 636 attempts (77%), leading the National League in SB % with 92% in 1978. His offensive WAR of 7.6 ranked 2nd in the NL in 1972. Video: Watch Cedeño steal home in July 1977. Cedeño was a five-time NL Gold Glove winner for his center field play, and was a National League All-Star in 1972, ’73, ’74, and ’76. He hit for the cycle twice in his career, and was the second player in MLB history (after the Cardinals’ Lou Brock) to hit 20-plus homers and steal 50-plus bases in a season, blasting 22 homers and stealing 55 bases in 1972, and 25 homers and 56 stolen bases in 1973. Cedeño, now 66, is currently the hitting coach at Houston’s rookie affiliate, The Greenville (TN) Astros. Cedeno WAR numbers 19 1.7 20 1.5 21 7.9 22 7.2 23 5.6 24 4.2 25 5.7 26 4.7

Greg, by this standard, EVERY SINGLE CONSERVATIVE COMMENTATOR would ALSO be fired, lol. The professor doesn't even work DIRECTLY for CNN, he hosts a show that's aired on that network. The Spelling Bee "faux pas" (Alison Camerota) was far from in good taste, but if that's a FIREABLE offense, then 75-80% of Americans would be fired from their jobs for WORSE than that. None of these things are remotely comparable to the Kathy Griffin case. And none of them is "Making America Great Again!" to waste further time discussing when there are many more pressing issues around the world and country to deal with.

http://www.fangraphs.com/depthcharts.aspx?position=Standings White Sox are now projected to finish 70-92 and get the 3rd pick. 4-5 games behind Phillies and Padres. Battle for 3rd with Braves/Reds/Royals.