Everything posted by chw42
-
2010-2011 NBA Thread
RONNIE BREWER!
-
2010-2011 NBA Thread
Slow it down, there's 5 minutes left and you have a 10 point lead.
-
2010-2011 NBA Thread
Very big shot by Brewer.
-
2010-2011 NBA Thread
Rose is missing almost everything.
-
2010-2011 NBA Thread
It's official: LeBron can do anything he wants and he'll never get called for anything.
-
2010-2011 NBA Thread
QUOTE (Soxbadger @ May 26, 2011 -> 09:43 PM) Oh Thibs why you didnt try this with Thomas before will boggle the mind This is what Haslem did for the Heat in game 2 basically.
-
2010-2011 NBA Thread
GIVE IT TO ME BIG SEXY!
-
Games won by the White Sox on 5/26/11 = 1
The Sox had just as many chances today as they did yesterday. Good thing Pierre was fast enough to beat that single out and force a bad play. When Pierre drives in all of your runs...well, that just means the rest of the team is probably doing something wrong.
-
2010-2011 NBA Thread
BIG SEXY!
-
2010-2011 NBA Thread
Deng's in some heavy foul trouble.
-
2010-2011 NBA Thread
QUOTE (Quinarvy @ May 26, 2011 -> 09:31 PM) I really, really didn't the refs were all the bad in this series until these past 5 minutes. Aren't they supposed to be giving the Bulls calls since the NBA usually wants a longer series? Or does Stern want Miami to win earlier so they can rest up and win the title?
-
2010-2011 NBA Thread
QUOTE (Felix @ May 26, 2011 -> 09:27 PM) I just turned it on, but that was definitely a foul on Noah. You remember when the T'Wolves got like 6 techs in a row? That was some funny s***. I thought this was a super mini version of that. Refs getting whistle happy.
-
2010-2011 NBA Thread
f*** THE REFS.
-
2010-2011 NBA Thread
So we get called for a travel when LeBron travels half the damn time?
-
2010-2011 NBA Thread
I don't think that should have been a flagrant...
-
2010-2011 NBA Thread
Come on offense, score some damn points. LeBron's acting again...
-
2010-2011 NBA Thread
13 point lead, gotta keep expanding it. Keep the foot on the pedal.
-
2010-2011 NBA Thread
They need to make transition baskets.
-
Games won by the White Sox on 5/26/11 = 1
QUOTE (Balta1701 @ May 26, 2011 -> 09:10 PM) Better? Much clearer.
-
Games won by the White Sox on 5/26/11 = 1
We've never won on 5/26?
-
2010-2011 NBA Thread
Wade has 7 TOs already?
- 5/26 at Blue Jays
-
The Ghost of Jim Thome is Killing Us
QUOTE (Jerksticks @ May 26, 2011 -> 03:06 PM) To A: Sluggers should have been in quotes. We really have just one guy in Dunn who fits the Thome mold. And yes, I'll always be down on that type of player but I understand the trade-off you're mentioning. It's the other 6 or so guys taking slugger-approaches at the plate that bothers me. To B: The Thome's Ghost comment is a facetious explanation of the same problem we've had for years and years. Only 1/3 of our lineup is ever productive, it sucks, and I'm sick of it. Maybe my wagons are finally circling in the "Fire Greg Walker" camp. I feel like Paulie is the only guy not listening to him. There's been some stuff from one of the beat writers that part of the reason Konerko came back was Walker. Konerko is a guy who tweaks so much in his swing so often, he really does need somebody to talk to about his mechanics. I wouldn't be surprised if Walker's one of this best friends.
-
The Ghost of Jim Thome is Killing Us
QUOTE (Jerksticks @ May 26, 2011 -> 02:15 PM) Demolished my eye. I think Thome epitomizes the all-or-nothing approach. That'll just have to remain my opinion. I hated every one of his at bats. Y'all loved him, good for you. In my eyes he fooled you. To each his own. Edit: I'm just not amazed with 120 hits per season. I don't care if he hit some to left or center. it's still a pathetic amount of hits from your hitting position, but whatever. And Sweet Fancy Moses with the "you'd rather have less offense" comment. Where do you get your material? Do you scrape it off the walls of yer septic tank with yer fingers? I'm clearly talking about guys who work counts, but that's cool, go ahead and continue to think there is only one type of good offensive player. Go ahead, you'll fit right in here. Meanwhile the Sox are under .500 with your sluggers, and all I want is for our players to stop swinging hard as f*** at 3 outa the first 4 pitches every time. Paulie gets it, Morel does to an extent, Carlos has flashes of it, Beckham used to and Pierre is just too weak for it to matter. Why do we put so much pressure on our pitchers to be perfect, and simultaneously let other pitchers do cartwheels through our lineup...well except once, or maybe twice a week? This isn't new for 2011. Jim Thome didn't work counts? My god, you're out of your mind. Go to Baseball-Reference and do some damn research, you're wasting everyone's time. I don't think everyone else was delusional of Thome when everyone in this thread except one thinks you're grasping at straws. Your mindset is extremely narrow: you go back on the handful of moments where Thome and hitters like him failed in big situations and continue to replay it over and over again until you make yourself believe that he was a horrible hitter. You refuse to believe anything else even though the guy is on the verge of 600 home runs, has a career .400 OBP, and will eventually get voted into the Hall of Fame. But oh, all of those stats were the result of stat padding, so forget it, he sucks. Until you prove to me and everyone else that Thome's contributions were nothing but stat-padding, you're just a crazy guy yapping nonsense.
-
The Ghost of Jim Thome is Killing Us
QUOTE (bigruss22 @ May 26, 2011 -> 11:31 AM) Hitting home runs isn't good baseball? Tell me how that works again? It kills rallies and it pads stats. If this thread is trying to draw a parallel between Dunn and Thome, then it's the wrong topic to go at. Thome has never been as bad as Dunn has been this year. The problem with Dunn isn't that he's an all-or-nothing hitter this year, it's because he's terrible and in a huge slump that pretty much nobody saw coming. A guy who puts up consistent 35+ HR seasons hitting like Mark Kotsay all of a sudden is unprecedented to say the least.