Jump to content

everafan

Members
  • Posts

    182
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by everafan

  1. Does Dan Haren wear eyeliner, I mean guyliner?
  2. I think the White Sox rely too heavily on the balk to score runs.
  3. QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 3, 2013 -> 03:01 PM) mlb's gameday is not working very well so far this year. I can't get gameday to load so I switched to espn gamecast. They are having issues too. They just put up Hosmer's BA vs Santana.
  4. QUOTE (CaliSoxFanViaSWside @ Apr 1, 2013 -> 06:01 PM) I'm Saling away Set an open course for the Virgin Sea 'Cause I've got to be free Free to face the life that's ahead of me On board, I'm the captain So climb aboard We'll search for tomorrow on every shore And I'll try, oh Lord, I'll try to carry on Lyrics from eLyrics.net Hmm - I always sang that line as "Set an open course, full of urgency"
  5. QUOTE (Cali @ Feb 12, 2013 -> 11:41 AM) How does everyone else look? Also, didn't these guys really take pride in themselves for 2007 being almost 100% right? Like as a sign that they know what the Sox will always do? Even though they've been wrong most of the time? (or am I thinking of someone else who got full of themselves projection-wise) If you go back and look at their analysis in 07 they were completely wrong. They projected a slight decline in offense and a giant decline in pitching. The opposite happened. Pitching was decent and offense was horrible. So they got the record right, but only because the exact opposite of what they projected happened.
  6. QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Mar 4, 2013 -> 06:31 PM) http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/...white-sox-2013/ Very good write-up on the team's chances this year. Meh - as usual, lazy and superficial analysis. Nobody really wants to do any original work on the White Sox. Also, "First, their run scoring was inflated by their park." So does that mean the pitching was affected by the park? And it's even better than the numbers they put up last year?
  7. QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Sep 10, 2012 -> 10:22 AM) If he is healthy and can stay focused having him back can be a plus. Floyd always produces 4 to 6 weeks each season of absolute dominance. Since he hasn't done it yet, nw is the perfect time.
  8. QUOTE (Brian @ Sep 10, 2012 -> 04:53 AM) This. It just seems obvious that Rios should be batting 3rd with Dunn out...or even with him in. Right or wrong, it's apparent that Robin thinks that moving Rios around in the lineup would mess with his head.
  9. QUOTE (flavum @ Sep 6, 2012 -> 10:01 AM) It's one of those things where we probably don't know the whole story, and will never know it. All I know is that I'll be happy if AJ is in the lineup Friday night. As far as rumors, no player is above suspicion. No team is above suspicion. MLB made its bed in the 90's and early 00's, letting anyone do anything. And this is just bi-product of that era. Wrong - there is no story. This started out of speculation because of his numbers and spread by haters, augmented by media and fans creating the back story from recent circumstances.
  10. QUOTE (TitoMB @ Sep 5, 2012 -> 07:55 PM) Damn, that's a pretty damning quote. Thanks for the info. I don't know if you're being sarcastic - Bernstien is a jerk - so the tweet is not suprising under any circumstances. I hope it's not trur.
  11. QUOTE (kitekrazy @ Sep 5, 2012 -> 07:40 PM) Name two. Define "recently". Be specific so we can test your accuracy by listening to SCORE podcasts. Last week, Mully, around 5:15 am. Talking about AJs mental lapses said something like we heard some rumors - you just hope he comes out of it. Berstein, after the lack of slide, tweeted - Now AJ doesn't slide, as if his teammates could hate him even more. Speigel wrote a Daily Herald article about it.
  12. QUOTE (RockRaines @ Sep 5, 2012 -> 12:00 PM) Does anyone REALLY think the score would sit on a rumor like this? Really? Many of the hosts have hinted at it recently.
  13. I really wish someone would research what relation Mary Jane Harrelson has to Hawk. AJ might actually be Hawk's nephew? Makes sense. Similarly, did everyone know that Scott Radinsky is Ozzie's brother in law?
  14. QUOTE (thxfrthmmrs @ Jul 30, 2012 -> 04:15 PM) It's obvious but it's true. When was the last time Kenny has bought high on a guy through trade or free agency? Adam Dunn
  15. QUOTE (Cali @ Jul 25, 2012 -> 01:42 PM) Someone is gonna get tossed today with that strike zone... Rosenthal tweeted that Hawk is going off https://twitter.com/Buster_ESPN/status/228198682460295169
  16. QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Jul 16, 2012 -> 11:04 AM) By all accounts, he is gonna be a Cub in 2013, trade or no trade. But the Cubs would be silly not to get something for him now and resign him in a few months.
  17. QUOTE (balfanman @ Jul 16, 2012 -> 10:13 AM) I predict that Dempster will be traded somewhere soon for something that would not exactly be considered a kings ransom. At that point, Soxtalk will explode with posters wondering why we didn't get him if that's all it took. Right on, right on - no one is going to overpay for a 6 month rental - mid level prospect gets it done. Cubs have to dump him or see him go for nothing.
  18. QUOTE (balfanman @ Jul 11, 2012 -> 09:37 AM) And as usual, Cowley couldn't keep himself from throwing K.W. under the bus, as if it was K.W's fault that fundamentals were not taught, or players held accountable for executing them. Totally bush league to suggest that KW's personal life and petty jealousy precluded him from paying attention to his job. Back it up Cowley!!!!
  19. QUOTE (Special K @ Jul 11, 2012 -> 08:26 AM) I don't doubt Ozzie being gone having a huge impact on this team's success, however, let's not forget the stranglehold on our offense that was Greg Walker is gone. Team is obviously hitting much better. For instance, Alex Rios, if anybody saw, comcast showed his 2011 batting stance vs. the 2012 and they were drastically different. Dunn obviously much better as well. Ozzie was Walker's boss. Ozzie is responsible for his staff's failure or success.
  20. QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Jul 11, 2012 -> 06:53 AM) I still don't get why so many people are saying this. I've people saying this on espn.com, Sports Illustrated, and here. The Tigers are giving up nearly 4½ runs per game, and they have a lot of games left against the top 5 offenses in the league (TEX, BOS, TOR, NYY, SOX). Their defense isn't going to get much better. Now, something could always happen to cause the Sox to fall apart, but I don't see the Tigers winning more than 85-86 games. The reason that the national media is saying it is because thus far, thier preseason predictions were horrible and lazy. If they admit they were wrong now, and the Tigers take over, then they were wrong twice. If they stick with their original projection - at worst they're only wrong once - and there's still a slim chance that they're right. And nobody really holds them accountable anyway. I don't know how a real Sox fan can say this. If you can't believe in this team and what you see on the field right now, what can you believe in? Why bother being a fan if you can't enjoy your 1st place Chicago White Sox.
  21. Funny that he addressed it in today's column. Very lazy here. He basically gets Paul Konerko to say that it wasn't as simple as a manager change, it was a change in organizational philosophy. Of course, Paulie isn't going to throw Ozzie under the bus. But even a 5th grader can interpret the meaning - this organizational change was not possible with Ozzie at the helm. One of Ozzie's favorite quotes was "The major league is not an instructional league" and "I can't teach these guys anyting". So there is no way that Ozzie would have gone along with the the reinforcement of baseball fundamentals. Ozzie is managing a talented team this year (as he did last year) and it is like ground hog day. All the drama, egomania, poor results, throwing players under ther bus, outrageous proclamations, etc. Ozzie was a great manager early in his career but he is a shell of that guy today. http://www.suntimes.com/sports/13706979-41...n-williams.html
  22. QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jul 10, 2012 -> 02:56 PM) He became irrelevant. Ironic.
  23. I know he was reprimanded for the sexist tweets but he retained his employment as a columnist. I scrolled through his recent columns and they are extremely vanilla. Did he get fired from his appearances on the Score? Is he reverting to the fetal position due to his allegiance to Ozzie, seeing that Ozzie appears to be on the sinking ship, not the irrelevant White Sox? Just wondering if he has any visibility in Chicago now that the Guillen family is in Miami.
  24. QUOTE (pittshoganerkoff @ Jul 10, 2012 -> 11:19 AM) They must be pulling their hair out hating on the White Sox with a former Red Sox favorite tearing it up. I think it's more abut indifference than hate. One analyst will do a superficial summary of the Sox and thousands will repeat it enough to make it seem true. Seriously, unless everything that could possibly go wrong with the Sox went wrong, no one with a brain would predict 67-95. But one dope made this prediction and everyone else fell in line.
×
×
  • Create New...