Flash Tizzle

Im sure Josh meant that as a joke, but everytime we respond to one of Beastlys threads and tell him to quit the bs we're only bumping his posts! I realize i'm doing it too.... but this time the thread was near the top of the page Just don't resond and he'll get the picture.

How were Grossmans numbers? havent seen any stats...

It would be too much of a hastle to look back on my posts trying to locate the exact cirmcumstances.... But similar to my last post, some member made a comment that you had another identity. I said, "Whats his other identity?" and you just replied :dips***; pointing up to my post. I had no problem with it, just made me wonder what you were trying to hide. Now that the topic was brought up again it just reignited my interest.

This is the second time I can recall someone claiming Brando has another identity. If so, WHAT IS IT? I wouldnt be so curious about it if everyone who knew wouldnt be so secretive about it. Last time I asked the poster who claimed Brando had another identity; Brando himself called me a dips***......but nobody answered the question. There are atleast 20 people on this site with the words "White Sox" and "Fan" in their name...you don't have to give yours up because somebody elses is similar.

I get it! If I believe PA is a spammer thats my opinion. And if PA believes I add nothing to this site and I'm a f***er thats ALL RIGHT TOO. Damn, I didn't realize we we're allowed to form our own opinions.

Nobody is pissed off Heads. I hope that nobody locks this thread..... maybe we can settle this argument without a mod putting his two cents in.

It doesnt offend me that you believe I have nothing positive to add to this site, PA. I post at Soxtalk to recieve information on the Chicago White Sox and not spend time in the off topic forum trying to make friends. Because its the off season I frequently browse threads in this forum that spark my interest. Now during several threads I noticed you and Texsox exchanging a spam-like conversation that goes back and forth. It didnt bother me at first because I would just scroll past the s*** or exit the thread. After viewing this several times I made a comment that it was annoying and to stop. You dont have to......You can keep doing it all you want PA. And I wasn't aware that by pointing this out I've ruined the site. Beastly atleast accepts criticism.

I'm not really fond of the Cub mentality that involves signing players that once played for our team. Especially if the player (Howry) was never good in the first place.

Orioles are probably waiting to see if they can sign Pudge and/or Vlad before committing money towards anyone else.

The indians signed Porzio..... Noteables:

For me, it just the bulls*** of Texsox and PA continuing some useless conversation along these lines for an entire thread: -Great post PA -Thanks Tex -No Problem -Great post -Thanks Tex STOP IT!!!

Dammit cw, you interrupted my flow. If you would delete your message and repost it that would be GREAT.

annoying. And I dont plan on putting that in green. Nor do you need to comment on how great a post it is.

f***ing

is

this

like

posting

Maybe the mods locked your thread because.....

http://www.suntimes.com/output/sports/cst-spt-sox20.html Heres the important part: By the end of 04 we could be short Maggs, Lee, and Frank. If the article has truth to it, I wouldn't be too happy about this development. But if Lee is being used as bait, Maggs will probably stay for next season. Hopefully we will have the money available to offer his ludicrous contract. (it will be and you know it)

This is a great move. Next year when payroll is more flexible we still have El Caballo to build a team around. Don't know what to think about Thomas (if he's still around). If he puts up a great year I wouldnt mind signing him for another year or two. After 500 home runs Thomas can do whatever the hell he wants with another team, but he should hit #500 with us.

If the damn deal for Arod/Manny didn't drag on for so long we could of had a better shot of signing Rhodes. Because of all the uncertaintly surrounding the deal, followed by the NOmar/Maggs proposal, it left the Sox with no clue on how much money we would have left to sign other players. Bean just walked over and picked up Rhodes while we were involved in all this s***.......which still hasn't happened.

Reading that article after browsing through the LA message boards, it would be within Evans best interest not to get involved with the Nomar/Maggs trade. People on that board were furious with the thought of picking up a player (Nomar) in his walk year to give up so many great pitchers. I believe their right.....but if Evans felt his job was in jeopardy he would make the trade regardless of what they think. Those who thought Maggs wasn't expendable under any circumstance I hope you read through the article. Jackson, their top prospect, throws 98 mph and is 20 years old! Mota was superb in the bullpen and Miller is also a quality pitcher. Trust me, you want Maggs traded if it brings this talent. Either get something for Maggs now or risk losing him next year for a draft pick.

Did they destroy that damn ring?

What I meant (even though it didnt come out that way) is that by negotiating for Nomar to come to the Sox....instead of to LA we f***ed over evans; who was looking to trade for him. IF Nomar is traded to us we're stuck with him, and still have two open slots in our starting rotation. Perez could of been acquired from LA along with Mota and stud prospect Greg Miller. Sox would of had a higher likelihood of signing those three beyond 04...unlike Nomar.