caulfield12 Posted November 19 Share Posted November 19 "The Crochet trade turned this organization around..." Ummm...yes, if we're the quasi Titanic, except much more low profile. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chick Mercedes Posted November 19 Share Posted November 19 (edited) 2 hours ago, caulfield12 said: "The Crochet trade turned this organization around..." Ummm...yes, if we're the quasi Titanic, except much more low profile. I would argue that being an organization with the capability to draft, develop and sign all stars would have been the turnaround we are looking for. In light of our inherent handicaps and hardships, we hopefully make plan B a relative success as much we can. Edited November 19 by Chick Mercedes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted November 19 Share Posted November 19 5 hours ago, Chick Mercedes said: I would argue that being an organization with the capability to draft, develop and sign all stars would have been the turnaround we are looking for. In light of our inherent handicaps and hardships, we hopefully make plan B a relative success as much we can. Sure, but your GM has to be right pretty much a majority of the time then. Not the let's say 25-30% success level Hahn and now Getz seem/ed to be operating at in trades signings drafts. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted November 19 Share Posted November 19 20 hours ago, Springfield Soxfan said: I know there is always the adage that one might get blown away by an offer and you have to take it; however, please don’t trade either one as the Sox are set at this position. The alternative is trade where they aren't set which wouldn't fetch much. The question becomes is thin set in two positions better than thick set in one? I'm addition to the we can't actually win a trade very often. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zisk Posted November 19 Share Posted November 19 20 hours ago, Squirmin' for Yermin said: I'd rather have someone who can play 90% of the time (position player) than Quero, a catcher who can only play 50% of the time. His bat isn't good enough to be a DH, and I prefer Teel by quite a bit. Quero is 2 years younger than Teel. He's gonna hit. I'd be more concerned about his back than anything else. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bighurt574 Posted November 19 Share Posted November 19 Doesn't make any sense to trade Teel now absent a godfather offer. The whole point of the rebuild is to find and develop guys like Teel. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted November 19 Share Posted November 19 4 hours ago, bighurt574 said: Doesn't make any sense to trade Teel now absent a godfather offer. The whole point of the rebuild is to find and develop guys like Teel. After you find and develop you have to use them to your advantage. Sometimes it's play them, sometimes it's trade them. It seems premature to trade him, but it's literally the only position that is above average today. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BamaDoc Posted November 21 Share Posted November 21 What is Querro's value? A recent top 100 prospect who generated 1.2 bwar when called up. 22yo switch-hitter at premium position. Yeah he is slow, so are almost all catchers. The fact he didn't bomb when called up I would think adds to his value so I would be holding out for a similar young player with some success in the outfield or if getting prospects a top 100 plus more? 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted November 21 Share Posted November 21 17 minutes ago, BamaDoc said: What is Querro's value? A recent top 100 prospect who generated 1.2 bwar when called up. 22yo switch-hitter at premium position. Yeah he is slow, so are almost all catchers. The fact he didn't bomb when called up I would think adds to his value so I would be holding out for a similar young player with some success in the outfield or if getting prospects a top 100 plus more? I think everyone is in agreement on that. It’s not trading him just to trade him. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenSox Posted November 25 Share Posted November 25 Teel can hit and can play outfield. He's obviously the most valuable. To me Quero passed the eye test at catcher; he's 22. Lots of potential And I still like Lee as a backup. Don't trade any, unless it's for a premium (and a big premium for Teel). 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kitekrazy Posted Sunday at 03:34 AM Share Posted Sunday at 03:34 AM On 11/18/2025 at 3:08 PM, Johno said: Absolutely have to keep both. The catcher position is prone to injuries, they can’t afford to trade one of these catchers, only to see the other one get hurt. this..........it could be a Grandal/Collins scenario..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSox2023 Posted Sunday at 03:51 AM Share Posted Sunday at 03:51 AM On 11/25/2025 at 11:04 AM, GreenSox said: Teel can hit and can play outfield. He's obviously the most valuable. To me Quero passed the eye test at catcher; he's 22. Lots of potential And I still like Lee as a backup. Don't trade any, unless it's for a premium (and a big premium for Teel). Teel played no games in the outfield in the minors and one game in LF in the majors. Do we really know he can play outfield? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
46DidIt Posted Sunday at 07:02 AM Share Posted Sunday at 07:02 AM What if it were for some one like James Wood. Then you still have Quero and Lee with outfield of Wood, Robert and Montgomery by August hopefully. To me Quero seemed to have better skills behind the plate anyway, although not sure what the numbers say. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted Sunday at 08:24 AM Share Posted Sunday at 08:24 AM 1 hour ago, 46DidIt said: What if it were for some one like James Wood. Then you still have Quero and Lee with outfield of Wood, Robert and Montgomery by August hopefully. To me Quero seemed to have better skills behind the plate anyway, although not sure what the numbers say. They're (Nats) not going to trade Wood for Quero....that's just pure fantasy. He's expected to be the centerpiece of their offense. Probably they trade Gore and attempt to add to their offense. IMO they'd be lucky to get Abrams back, but that doesn't fit the Sox timeline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nrockway Posted Sunday at 04:43 PM Share Posted Sunday at 04:43 PM 9 hours ago, 46DidIt said: What if it were for some one like James Wood. Then you still have Quero and Lee with outfield of Wood, Robert and Montgomery by August hopefully. To me Quero seemed to have better skills behind the plate anyway, although not sure what the numbers say. I think a more realistic option, depending how FA shakes out, is Quero for Jasson Dominguez. Wells is an OK catcher but they have no depth there and Quero will almost certainly be the better hitter. Also no depth behind oft-injured Stanton at DH. If the Yankees land Tucker or keep Bellinger, Dominguez (and/or Spencer Jones) have no where to play. Quero may end up the better player, but I’d rather have a guy who plays every day at a position of weakness. Lee is a fine backup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.