OD 26 Man Roster Projection

[chitownsportsfan]

31 minutes ago, CaliSoxFanViaSWside said:

All fair . Will that be a literal parade or a parade in your head  ? 

I think Venable and his staff would deserve a lot of credit too . 

 

I like Will, but managers don't usually make or break baseball teams, talent does. I def agree he's the right man for the job right now and he is a good motivator and leader.

[ptatc]

20 minutes ago, chitownsportsfan said:

I like Will, but managers don't usually make or break baseball teams, talent does. I def agree he's the right man for the job right now and he is a good motivator and leader.

Always the debate like when LaRussa or Venture were the managers. How much does a manager matter?

Ive always said not much. Especially now with the analytics department having a big influence on lineups.

[caulfield12]

40 minutes ago, ptatc said:

Always the debate like when LaRussa or Venture were the managers. How much does a manager matter?

Ive always said not much. Especially now with the analytics department having a big influence on lineups.

2012 Ventura made value huge difference until crunch time with the more talented Tigers.

Sox also had improved "morale/fighting spirit" under Sizemore.

 

Not exactly Indiana football under Cignetti, but they can make a difference on the margins...

[caulfield12]

1 hour ago, WestEddy said:

2) Murakami should be better than Vaughn. C. Monty for a full year. Less Sosa/Benintendi. Pereira/Acuña are good defensive OFs. Growth from Meidroth, Vargas, Teel, Quero. 

brotherhood

So teams that finish under .500 never become close or learn how to play together? I'm not sure who you're responding to, here, but predicting 75-78 wins isn't "competitive". 

So the 2013 Royals and 2019 White Sox are fair comparisons of where they SHOULD be after 3 1/3rd years of rebuilding?

[WestEddy]

33 minutes ago, caulfield12 said:

So the 2013 Royals and 2019 White Sox are fair comparisons of where they SHOULD be after 3 1/3rd years of rebuilding?

What are you even responding to? Do you plan on even acknowledging anything I've responded to in good faith, or will you keep ignoring and flitting off to another leading question with no context?

[caulfield12]

36 minutes ago, WestEddy said:

What are you even responding to? Do you plan on even acknowledging anything I've responded to in good faith, or will you keep ignoring and flitting off to another leading question with no context?

The context is those teams were deemed to be successful ramp up seasons to playoff/World Series runs for two rebuilding organizations.

Is it fair to compare this year’s White Sox team to them?

KC won 86.

Sox went 72-89.

79 is the midpoint and pretty much the midpoint of 75-81 win projections flying around recently for this year’s team.

So 78, basically.  Fegan was at 79, right?

You’re willing to set that as your definition of success for the rebuild at this point?

 

[Look at Ray Ray Run]

8 hours ago, CaliSoxFanViaSWside said:

I assumed you were aware that actually calling a certain group of people crazy or cult like for optimistic viewpoints is generally frowned upon .But since your head seems to be planted firmly in the sand your ignorance  is understandable.

It had calmed down lately but apparently you dont have a filter and cant read the room. 

Tell me what your prediction is then.Let other have a crack at you . I noticed last year in the predicted wins thread when most people took the normal route of making a prediction before any games where played  you waited until the season was half over before you could commit to being on record. 

Apparently being optimistic lacks brainpower and everyone just buys into Sox propaganda and  you can separate the wheat from the chaffe. You have expressed this opinion before.

So please just give your opinion before the season starts this time. There's plenty of betting lines out there and WAR estimates of wins that range from 64.5 to 74.

There's also Pythagorean models that had the Sox at 71 wins last year . So they underperformed last year by 11 games. That usually indicates regression to the mean which would be a much better record the following year .

Being optimistic and encouraging is a choice of how you treat people. There are times in life especially when raising children or coaching that it's your job to nurture , encourage and teach that confidence and belief in yourself and your team mates means something. Winning means something. A lot of these players were a part of the Birmingham Barons 2 consecutive Championships. Winning breeds winning.

That optimists are sheep talk would be dangerous if you were in political office. Are you part of an elite ruling class that knows better than most ? Your baseball acumen and people skills aren't that impressive . 

 

 

 

 

There's no regression occurring YoY with a differnet collection of people. That's not how statistics work.

The Pythagorean model in baseball also isnt some advanced model. It's a basic model that calculates expected wins based on run differential. It's not meant to be a true barometer of performance.

Being optimistic in sports has absolutely nothing to do with how you treat people and others. Youre not a good person just because youre optimistically delusional. The fact that you think your positivity om soxtalk is nurturing these players is bordering on crazy talk.

67 wins feels about right.

Edited 14 hours ago by Look at Ray Ray Run

[caulfield12]

11 minutes ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

There's no regression occurring YoY with a differnet collection of people. That's not how statistics work.

The Pythagorean model in baseball also isnt some advanced model. It's a basic model that calculates expected wins based on run differential. It's not meant to be a true barometer of performance.

Being optimistic in sports has absolutely nothing to do with how you treat people and others. Youre not a good person just because youre optimistically delusional. The fact that you think your positivity om soxtalk is nurturing these players is bordering on crazy talk.

67 wins feels about right.

You mean if more people pray for Notre Dame than their opponents...they still might not win every game?

You'd think that owners would prioritize filling stadiums for increased home field advantage (rather than dynamic pricing) if it would lead to let's say an extra 3-5 wins per season and fans would resultingly feel like they're actually receiving a value-added experience of a sold out rather than 40-60% capacity attended game...?

Edited 14 hours ago by caulfield12

[Chicago White Sox]

1 hour ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

There's no regression occurring YoY with a differnet collection of people. That's not how statistics work.

The Pythagorean model in baseball also isnt some advanced model. It's a basic model that calculates expected wins based on run differential. It's not meant to be a true barometer of performance.

Being optimistic in sports has absolutely nothing to do with how you treat people and others. Youre not a good person just because youre optimistically delusional. The fact that you think your positivity om soxtalk is nurturing these players is bordering on crazy talk.

67 wins feels about right.

So you think this team is going to put up about 15 fWAR next year?

[Look at Ray Ray Run]

1 hour ago, Chicago White Sox said:

So you think this team is going to put up about 15 fWAR next year?

67 wins would be around 21 fWAR, but the range would really be between about 19 fWAR and 23 fWAR is reasonable for 67 wins. I have this pitching staff around 8 fWAR and the offense around 13 fWAR.

Edited 12 hours ago by Look at Ray Ray Run

[CaliSoxFanViaSWside]

17 hours ago, caulfield12 said:

Now you've done it.

Well, this should be an interesting response.  If you in fact receive one.

Kudos for the extra feelings/emotions thrown in at the end.

Something between defenestration and evisceration is coming.

 

If you want to go back to your political analogy, selling hope/change/optimism tends to be better received.  It's basic human nature.

Even liberals can read Atlas Shrugged and be halfway convinced.

Unfortunately there's no John Galt fighting on behalf of the White Sox.

I didnt do anything. I merely explained that posting about people being crazy is one person telling a group of people how to act .

In the past he's also told us what should embarass us and called people sheep. It's him that did something. 

If we don't fall in line with his thinking, he feels a need to insult us. That is a dangerous way to act . God forbid that a little bit of winning in ST makes people happy after a few bad seasons and not having seen 3 games over .500 in a while. 

Edited 4 hours ago by CaliSoxFanViaSWside

[WestEddy]

MLBTR focuses on out-of-option players on the bubble this spring

Out Of Options Players To Watch This Spring - MLB Trade Rumors

Quote

Lee has been a more straightforward roster bubble type for a while. That’s the way it goes for an out-of-options third catcher. Kyle Teel and Edgar Quero have significantly higher ceilings. The Sox might carry three catchers, especially if they want Teel and Quero sharing at-bats at designated hitter on days when the other is behind the plate. Most teams prefer to have more versatility off the bench, though, so it seems only a matter of time before Lee ends up traded or on waivers. Lee isn’t going to provide anything offensively, but he’s a former first-round pick with a plus arm who could stick as a backup somewhere else.