It might be nice if our f***ing hitters can make contact.

 

 

This is chan ho park not Roger Clemens.

What is everyon'es obsession with Randa? Has he done anything spectacular since the calendar turned to May?

[/quote

 

No, if it wasn't for Randa's great first week, he'd have worse numbers than Crede.

If the Sox are trading for a 3rd baseman, let em get a good one. Randa hasn't exactly done all that grand since his hot start this year. Kind of like Joe Crede and Crede is better defensively.

Big inning time.

Wow, two jam shots and the sox are in trouble.

Nice range by Crede at 3rd.

Just a note on Randa, he has a chronic bad back and has been bothered by a sore foot for several weeks ... Crede has a similar foot problem.

Just a note on Randa, he has a chronic bad back and has been bothered by a sore foot for several weeks ... Crede has a similar foot problem.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Randa with a chronic bad back is better than a 100% healthy Cruddy.

1) Joe Crede is a worthless piece of f***ing s***

2) Here comes a big inning, guranteed

I guess I was wrong, just looked at Randa's stats and he hasn't been struggling at all this month.

 

Not a bad idea, but I still don't know if I'd deal Crede straight up for him. I know damn well that the Reds would do it.

Here's where Jon has changed and can maybe limit texas to one run.

 

EDIT: By the way I was typing that before that out, just to make that clear.

Edited May 29, 200520 yr by Rowand44

Just a note on Randa, he has a chronic bad back and has been bothered by a sore foot for several weeks ... Crede has a similar foot problem.

 

Honestly, we all want a replacement for Crede. However, Randa would not be a wise addition to the team. He's a definite injury risk right now, and it looks to be having a negative impact on his power. He doesn't have any homers this month after having about 4 in the first week of the season.

Randa with a chronic bad back is better than a 100% healthy Cruddy.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Wasn't commenting on the relative worth of the two players, just saying.

Garland not getting that outside corner to lefties at all.

I guess I was wrong, just looked at Randa's stats and he hasn't been struggling at all this month. 

 

Not a bad idea, but I still don't know if I'd deal Crede straight up for him. I know damn well that the Reds would do it.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Are you nuts? Why not?

Edited May 29, 200520 yr by Jabroni

Randa with a chronic bad back is better than a 100% healthy Cruddy.

 

Agreed, but Crede has potential.

Garland not getting that outside corner to lefties at all.

Nope and that strike call on Rowand on the inside corner (the outside corner to lefties) was total bs (the called strikeout when Dye was running).

Are you nuts?  Why not?

Cause Crede has more trade value then randa, no doubt about that.

I guess I was wrong, just looked at Randa's stats and he hasn't been struggling at all this month. 

 

Not a bad idea, but I still don't know if I'd deal Crede straight up for him.  I know damn well that the Reds would do it.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

If Crede gets hurt the Sox will go hard after Randa. If Crede stays healthy, they won't. And I agree Jason, the Reds would be all over a one for one swap, the White Sox won't.

Can we trade Crede for that Monkey in the movie with Matthew LeBlanc. He was a much better player.

FUUUUCK

1-0

Alright one scores, just limit the damage Jon.

Garland's only weakness -- he has no strikeout pitch. That is exact the situation in which he needs one.

If Crede gets hurt the Sox will go hard after Randa.  If Crede stays healthy, they won't.  And I agree Jason, the Reds would be all over a one for one swap, the White Sox won't.

 

Then I'm gonna break Crede's leg. That's right, it's not green.

Alright one scores, just limit the damage Jon.

Not the best approach when we can't score for f***ing s***.

Garland got away with that pitch there. The one pitch that he always seems to have problems controlling is that changeup.