GASHWOUND Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 WOOHOO..The Bears are ranked....32!!! So we're the worst team the world has ever seen...WOOHOO :headshake http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/...5/scout.report/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamTell Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 (edited) The Chiefs are surprisingly 10th. Edited August 31, 2005 by WilliamTell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 (edited) If the Bears are the worst team in the league I will not post for 2 months after football season. Â Oh how stupid people are. Â Ya the Bears are really going to get worse by 2 W's after adding Moose, Url, Zoom, Tillman, Benson, Orton, Bradley, a healthy Ogun, Miller, and Garza... Edited August 31, 2005 by WHarris1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Aug 30, 2005 -> 10:55 PM) If the Bears are the worst team in the league I will not post for 2 months after football season. Oh how stupid people are.  Ya the Bears are really going to get worse by 2 W's after adding Moose, Url, Zoom, Tillman, Benson, Orton, Bradley, a healthy Ogun, Miller, and Garza... Aren't you usually the one that loses bets with DBAH0? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 QUOTE(knightni @ Aug 30, 2005 -> 09:59 PM) Aren't you usually the one that loses bets with DBAH0? I havent ever bet with DBAH0 till this year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 (edited) They project we go 3-13? LMAO Open to all bets . We will win more than 3 games. Edited August 31, 2005 by rangercal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AirScott Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(rangercal @ Aug 30, 2005 -> 10:10 PM) They project we go 3-13? LMAO  Open to all bets . We will win more than 3 games. anybody know what Vegas' is setting the Bears at for wins? cause if it's 3, I'd definitely take the over and make a cool...well $20, since that's all the money I've got right now. Edited August 31, 2005 by AirScott Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASHWOUND Posted August 31, 2005 Author Share Posted August 31, 2005 QUOTE(rangercal @ Aug 30, 2005 -> 10:10 PM) They project we go 3-13? LMAO Open to all bets . We will win more than 3 games.  How the hell did we get worse then last year? We almost won 6 games last year and we had freakin Hutchinson starting..We added a Pro Bowl WR, another OL so to make the line better, our running game should be good and we have the best D in that freakin div..Anybody see that Lions game? This is the team that's better then us? Green bay lost just about all the O line and that D is pathetic..The Vikes should be good, but am i missin something..am I not being objective here.. A team that is that good on D can't possibly be ranked last in the NFL..  But hey, what the hell do i know..they're the "experts" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepyWhiteSox Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 QUOTE(GASHWOUND @ Aug 30, 2005 -> 10:22 PM) How the hell did we get worse then last year? We almost won 6 games last year and we had freakin Hutchinson starting..We added a Pro Bowl WR, another OL so to make the line better, our running game should be good and we have the best D in that freakin div..Anybody see that Lions game? This is the team that's better then us? Green bay lost just about all the O line and that D is pathetic..The Vikes should be good, but am i missin something..am I not being objective here.. A team that is that good on D can't possibly be ranked last in the NFL.. Â But hey, what the hell do i know..they're the "experts" Â Yeah, don't forget the favorable schedule starting off... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASHWOUND Posted August 31, 2005 Author Share Posted August 31, 2005 QUOTE(AirScott @ Aug 30, 2005 -> 10:16 PM) anybody know what Vegas' is setting the Bears at for wins? cause if it's 3, I'd definitely take the over and make a cool...well $20, since that's all the money I've got right now.  Not sure about that, but USA Today's Danny Sheridan has set the odds of us winning the Super bowl at 100 million to 1..only the Browns and 49ers and Browns are worst.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 QUOTE(GASHWOUND @ Aug 30, 2005 -> 10:22 PM) How the hell did we get worse then last year? We almost won 6 games last year and we had freakin Hutchinson starting..We added a Pro Bowl WR, another OL so to make the line better, our running game should be good and we have the best D in that freakin div..Anybody see that Lions game? This is the team that's better then us? Green bay lost just about all the O line and that D is pathetic..The Vikes should be good, but am i missin something..am I not being objective here.. A team that is that good on D can't possibly be ranked last in the NFL.. Â But hey, what the hell do i know..they're the "experts" I think we win 6-8 games alone no matter what our offense does, just because our D is so good. 10 games, with our schedule, is very doable, if we are healthy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 I think I could make some serious cash off this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASHWOUND Posted August 31, 2005 Author Share Posted August 31, 2005 QUOTE(rangercal @ Aug 30, 2005 -> 10:30 PM) I think we win 6-8 games alone no matter what our offense does, just because our D is so good. 10 games, with our schedule, is very doable, if we are healthy.  I agree, I'm not saying we're gonna rack up 12 wins or anything..I said 7 or 8 wins..depending how good Orton is and if our D stays healthy. But ranked last? So i guess all those other teams ahead of us have HOF QB startin for them. yeah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 The 49ers would be looking at that and, well....... yeah. Â Yeah the Bears defense is great, would you say the Bears would have the 2nd worst offense if football only ahead of San Fran. at the moment though? They'd be possily better than Miami, and Washington. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Aug 31, 2005 -> 12:55 PM) If the Bears are the worst team in the league I will not post for 2 months after football season. Oh how stupid people are.  Ya the Bears are really going to get worse by 2 W's after adding Moose, Url, Zoom, Tillman, Benson, Orton, Bradley, a healthy Ogun, Miller, and Garza... Of course injuries could happen again this year, and it's not like Urlacher missed the whole season. Is Bradley going to be a difference maker straight away? These are the type of questions the Bears need to answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Aug 30, 2005 -> 10:40 PM) Of course injuries could happen again this year, and it's not like Urlacher missed the whole season. Is Bradley going to be a difference maker straight away? These are the type of questions the Bears need to answer. The Bears were 5-4 with Urlacher and 0-7 without him last year. Urlacher is the heart and soul of this team. Last year was the first time in his career that he missed a game, I don't expect him to miss much time this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dam8610 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 OH MY GOD! I never thought I'd live to see the day where Dr. Z EVER praised the Colts. He has them as the #1 team. I guess I should be happy about that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 QUOTE(knightni @ Aug 30, 2005 -> 08:59 PM) Aren't you usually the one that loses bets with DBAH0? He's the one that always loses bets to me I don't like the Bears but there is no way they're the worst team in the league... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Aug 31, 2005 -> 01:12 AM) He's the one that always loses bets to me I don't like the Bears but there is no way they're the worst team in the league... I know, the Dolphins are MUCH worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(Kalapse @ Aug 31, 2005 -> 12:15 AM) I know, the Dolphins are MUCH worse. Damn that personal attack rule You're right unfortunately Edited August 31, 2005 by Rowand44 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Aug 31, 2005 -> 04:12 PM) He's the one that always loses bets to me Such as.............. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Aug 31, 2005 -> 12:23 AM) Such as.............. There's been 3 sig bets I've beat him in. The first one was Vermont vs. 'Cuse in the ncaa tournament, the 2nd was a Sox-Tigers game a few months back where the sox were down by 1 in like the 3rd inning and he took the tigers and the third was that the sox would make atleast one trade before the trade deadline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Aug 31, 2005 -> 04:26 PM) There's been 3 sig bets I've beat him in. The first one was Vermont vs. 'Cuse in the ncaa tournament, the 2nd was a Sox-Tigers game a few months back where the sox were down by 1 in like the 3rd inning and he took the tigers and the third was that the sox would make atleast one trade before the trade deadline. Ahh yes, stupid me thinkin you were referring to yours truly, and then I realised it was willie. Not lookin too good on that Bears vs. Cowboys bet right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASHWOUND Posted August 31, 2005 Author Share Posted August 31, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(GASHWOUND @ Aug 30, 2005 -> 09:50 PM) WOOHOO..The Bears are ranked....32!!! So we're the worst team the world has ever seen...WOOHOO  :headshake http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/...5/scout.report/   Well, FOXSports.com has us ranked 29th..at least we're not ranked last..WOOHOO..uhh, yeah  http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/4802386 Edited August 31, 2005 by GASHWOUND Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(GASHWOUND @ Aug 31, 2005 -> 02:53 AM) Well, FOXSports.com has us ranked 29th..at least we're not ranked last..WOOHOO..uhh, yeah  http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/4802386 Remember where the power polls ranked the sox before April. They fooled all the writers. The bulls fooled EVERYBODY. I like our D. If baltimore won it all with a young D, Trent Dilfer, and a rookie Running Back in 00-01. I don't see why we can't go 9-7, 10-6 ect. With the additions, new coordinator, favorable schedule, and a f***ing D I am in love with so much, that I will just post their names right now. Adewale , A Brown , Tommie Harris , Michael Haynes, Tank, Ian scott, Briggs , Lacher , Hillen, Mike Brown , Mike Green , Zoom , Vasher , Peanut  We will be just fine. Edited August 31, 2005 by rangercal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.