Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour

  2. They also reportedly prioritized getting an OF piece
  3. Pereira had a very good Sunday with a double a homer and 4 rbis and gets DFA the next day. Yeah he was hurt but Teel’s been hurt the just about the whole year. Hays has a pretty good track record and we throw 6 million out the window and DFA him. None of this makes sense.
  4. I keep reading that there's a dearth of RHH OFs, but somehow nobody would give us anything for Hays of Periera, oh well.
  5. Remember with Contreras they just made it look like every pitch was gonna be the splitter. Good luck, it’s either falling off the table or it’s gonna be 96 on the hands
  6. Kay makes like $6 million a year so .8 fWAR ain't too bad. He's either neutral or a successful signing. The rest of the guys (minus Dominguez) were cheap, and the Car Jerker was here for like a month. The most expensive was Hays at $6 mil/-.4 fWAR. I'll give you Dominguez as a failed signing, but you've got an outfield of BMont at 0.9 fWAR (in 45 games), Peters at 2.4 fWAR, and Antonacci at 1.4 fWAR. They didn't really end up needing Hays in the way they thought they would, so I have a hard time calling that a failed signing. Murakami and Murphy alone have combined for 3.9 fWAR. I don't think any GM is 100% successful at free agent signings. In fact I'd bet the success rate is pretty low, especially where the Sox usually play. I'm pretty content with what the Sox did with their free agent signings, especially given where the team is right now.
  7. Fair enough. I do think there's a good chance he turns it around because of the track record you cite, I'm just dubious a contender would be interested in rostering him.
  8. Today

  9. I read that LAD just made Roki Sasaki use a bigger glove so it's more difficult to pick up on a tip. Let's send Davis out looking like this next start.
  10. It's a day that ends in day on Soxtalk...
  11. The "isn't good when he does" is simply false, he's pretty damn good against LHP and total OPS+ of 106 for his career. I'd happily make the argument that Montgomery shouldn't be on the roster in a playoff push with his .600 something OPS, but Benintendi being unusable in the OF means Braden has to stay to man RF. I'll happily bet $10 that Hays is claimed.
  12. Im sorry to hear that and hope things turn around for you.
  13. There's a big difference between in-season pick-ups and DFA trades and actual free-agent signings. All teams in the off-season are roster building, and so their value is set by the league and not artificially deflated by waivers or other teams being fully constructed. FA shows your ability to evaluate MLB players. The Sox gave 20 million dollars to a guy that they decided 6 months later wasn't even worth a quarter of that. They gave 6 million to a guy with injury history and then released him for free because an injury slowed down his year. My point with Murakami is that he was never a part of Getz off-season plans when he set them. He thought a player at the price he was expecting wasn't attainable. So his actual off-season plan going into it was everything he got minus Murakami.
  14. I thought EP had some skills. Too bad.
  15. I think Grichuk is baked in. He's been there all year, and Hays hasn't. Hays can't seem to stay healthy. Pereira looks a bit fragile, also. I was hoping Pereira would break out, Carlos Quentin-like. T'was not to be.
  16. I added Murakami as a success. I also added Kay as a success which was me being very generous, so funny to see this idea that I gave no credit.
  17. But Getz convinced JR to not care about money, so that's a masterful upwards managing job by our GM.
  18. Peters was traded after being DFA. Definitely not a FA signing. Grichuck also a DFA pick up in season so not an offseason FA signing.
  19. I just don’t understand some of these moves, I don’t think you had to trade for any outfielders when we already had Hays and Pereira.
  20. I think just that. He tried to trade both and found no takers. Calling that roster mismanagement is ridiculous. They had a pretty visible roster crunch coming. The fact they were able to pick the guys they wanted and DFA the others is good. As you accept RayRay's description of trades, the Rockies gave us Doyle for free.
  21. Youre right, not sure how I missed him. I liked that move which is probably why I forgot it in my negative rant!
  22. At the time, I really liked this signing. That destined him to a DFA.
  23. Yes. He was a temporary replacement that ended up becoming full time. Grichuk is forth on the team in home runs
  24. 2022 was a dissapointment/
  25. That was the case in 1981 and 1994 to be sure. At least they had a good season in 1982 after the collapse in 81 when play resumed in August. 1995 was a season to forget.
  26. Never in a million years!

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.