Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour

  2. I just don't see any value to keeping him around. I can't see the Sox eating both him and Benny's contract. How the Sox didn't see his clear cut warning signs he is cooked is beyond me. Talk about falling in love with the back of the baseball card when all the metrics out there state the obvious.
  3. f*** YES. WEAR EM FOR EVERY HOME GAME LEFT SO LONG AS THEY WIN OUT THE FINAL 6 AT HOME!!!! LETS. FUCKING. GO!!!!
  4. Author sheds MLB for claiming no salary cap is why they have blackouts: "What does this have to do with TV blackouts? As part of the league’s public relations campaign to gin up support for the cap/floor system, MLB has tied implementing a salary cap to eliminating TV blackouts. The suggestion is that the only way MLB could eliminate blackouts is by implementing a salary cap. This, however, is a complete farce. Blackouts directly reflect the media deals the league and its teams have struck with their broadcast partners. Regional sports networks (and now streamers) will pay a premium for exclusivity, which is only possible with blackouts. Similarly, national networks will pay a premium to ensure the games they air aren’t also available on regional sports networks, which would cannibalize their audience. In other words, blackouts exist only because the league and its teams want to make more money. It has nothing to do with the players objecting to a salary cap." Awful AnnouncingMLBPA director Bruce Meyer refutes MLB suggestion that TV...MLBPA executive director Bruce Meyer says the league could end blackouts whenever they want instead of blaming players.
  5. In the Sun-Times today he acknowledged that his swing had become to "upper cut."
  6. Can we take 22 runs in the next 3 games? I like that better
  7. From Thompson’s comments about being a “dreamer”, it seems that he envisioned just that, actually. Apartments and retail space, likely mixed use, as well as a hotel would have definitely led to more activity/development around that stretch. While it’s hard to justify going to the ChiSox Bar & Grill when it’s offering its concessions at stadium prices, any independent businesses neighboring it would have lower prices to compete in the market. Jerry likely knew this and didn’t want that. Bridgeport never had a chance to proof itself. Reinsdorf’s reluctance to commercialize the area guaranteed that.
  8. Can, but literally never have.
  9. It was written about at the time that JR wanted all income opportunities inside the park so the franchise would get all of the fans money.
  10. Like last night, hope they have good luck again this evening.
  11. I never said the Sox couldn’t afford it. 5-years, $75 million. All you need to do is look at history.
  12. If the Tigers can sign a guy, the White Sox definitely can. That isn’t that much money.
  13. Yeah, by far the best one in MLB.
  14. f*** yeah. They're so much better than the new ones I forgot how much I loved those.
  15. Interesting exchange. So, it was Jerry that didn't want it, but at the same time the location wasn't going to turn this area into another Wrigleyville even if they did. They did open the ChiSox Bar and Grill. It seems fine, but doesn't seem to be a massive draw either. Also interesting point about all the parking lots that are to the south of the stadium. They border a church, a school, and CHA housing (plus a senior housing high-rise). That doesn't sound like prime "stadium district" land to me.
  16. I don't know - that's an awful lot of runs to use up for just one win. They need to be reasonable
  17. WE DID IT! KEEP EM ROLLIN WITH MORE W'S
  18. No, because I was at a wedding in Ireland lol I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw the score later.
  19. The ISFA owns Rate Field as well as the parking lots used for games, so any development would require a coordination effort between Reinsdorf and the ISFA. The excerpt from DoUEvenShift’s post shows that Reinsdorf (and by extension the ISFA) didn’t care to develop the area.
  20. Haha, I literally just updated my post to include this.
  21. With Jerry as owner?
  22. Remember that Friday night game in June when the offense exploded for 22 runs against KC? I think they should do that again tonight.
  23. Framber was not really a realistic target for the Sox. 3-years and $115 million? Maybe with a new owner.
  24. Took 2 out of 3 and they have a better September record than the Sox. I can see the A's taking 2 out of 3 against CLE.
  25. Coming this weekend, The Chicago Dirty Canal Swim!
  26. Doesn't Jerry own a majority of the land around the Rate. IF so I ma sure developing it was the better option than leaving it as seldom used parking space. If I were to guess it was Bridgeport that pushed back on building up and now they will get a train yard for their effort.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.