WestEddy

I see no problem with keeping a prospect at AAA to get reps and hone their skills out of the spotlight. Colson Montgomery is still at AAA, and I wouldn't call his presence there a massive flop. DeLoach has hit 1 HR at a park that is a launching pad. Fletcher seemed to press on a team that started the season in a horrible slump, and I don't see an issue with taking him back a level to clear his head and reestablish good habits. I see the acquisition of Julks as an opportunity to get a platoon partner and RH bat. The guy they let go is a rookie level bullpen arm that throws an 88-90 mph fastball. He's not a prospect. This move does not fit into your narrative. The Sox just traded 34 year old Robbie Grossman for 23 year old Anthony Hoopii-Tuionetoa. Maybe Getz made a mistake. Or maybe the narrative is silly. You recently called me insane for suggesting that giving vets time to come back from injury or establish themselves as a trade piece does indeed help this team down the road. I'm not sure why.

I saw it as him getting $3-4 million more up front, guaranteeing it, and giving up $7-17 million on the 2 FA years. The White Sox did him a solid by running him out there as a starter. I feel there could be a bit of a hometown discount for that, alone.

First of all, I'm not making up narratives. We are literally in a string where people are complaining about trading a rookie-level bullpen arm they didn't even know existed until they saw the new string. And this happens after every single trade or DFA. So please stop making up BS and tagging me with it. People are ripping Chris Getz in this particular string for an insignificant roster move. Stretching their arguments out to the logical end, the White Sox should never release or trade anybody unless they're getting somebody younger. Even if the younger person has less talent, because all these people are reacting to is the ages. Some guy is even ripping on me for posting a Fangraphs write-up of the guy we traded, because it ruins their narrative. The White Sox have to play the games on their schedule. They need players to do that. Not some A-ball phenom who will fail miserably, but capable vets, or MLB-ready prospects. I understand that your opinion is that the White Sox should be getting progressively younger with each and every move they make. That's not realistic. It's a nice goal, but to use that as an overriding tenet that never gets violated is silly. Every incident that happens in White Sox world isn't a Chris Getz failure. The people who insist on framing every personnel move as part of a troubling pattern aren't being "objective". You are actively whining that the White Sox aren't making more moves that will result in a worse record for the major league club this year, so please don't scold me over a 50-win team. You don't get to have it both ways, using a bad win-loss record to beat me over the head with, while saying that the win-loss record this season doesn't matter. I didn't like the Maldonado signing, and my eyes roll every time I see him in the lineup. Me bitching about it everyday in every single string isn't going to reduce his playing time. That's called being an adult, not "sweeping it under the rug". Ortega is a 4th OF that probably took up space while Dominic Fletcher got his head straight in AAA. Raphael Ortega isn't a "trend". To even pretend that an insignificant roster move to have a 4th OF on the major league team is a problem that bolsters your argument is insane.

I've thought something on the order of 5/10/15/18 million option. This essentially buys out 1-2 years of FA, and he hits actual free agency as a 29-year-old.

These things actually happened. Ask your mom. How in the world would you get that I'm arguing that minor league depth is not important? That's a strawman argument. You do realize that there is a cap on how many minor leaguers a team can have now, right? There's a whole bunch of people who scream and cry when anybody's DFAed or traded, or whatnot, and they post the first couple of starts these players make after leaving the Sox system. But, it's been strangely silent for people criticizing the Oakland organization for DFAing Alex Speas after they claimed him from the Sox. You're just piling on. I reallly don't understand what you're doing with this comment.

The weird thing about people set in their ways - calamity only seems to steel their resolve.

I'm old enough to remember the internet explosion when the Sox traded Jake Peter for somebody. Or released AA pitcher Jordan Guerrero. The same people who scream that minor league depth is soooooooo important that we have to hold onto these guys until they sign up for AARP are the same ones posting laughing emojis when you mention that we're starting to amass some minor league depth. They're screeching points. Nothing more. New Coke.

The players we're calling "prospects" - all teams dump them every day of the season. He's most likely a guy who would have been cut once this year's draftees and FA signings hit the complex in July/August. Or he'd be dropped next week as some other kid recovers from his injury, and is ready to start pitching again.

The Sox offense was so moribund that a utility infielder and 36-year-old OF who can hit made them much better. And they're hanging in there with teams like the Cards, Rays, Nats - teams that can't get out of their own way. We'll see this next week how they'd look against the main teams in the AL this next week.

Jordan Montgomery has a much longer track record, but Fedde's rate stats look similar to Montgomery's on St. Louis last year, and he brought back two prospects who have since slid into BA's top 100. If Fedde does this for 8 more weeks, I could see him bringing back 2 guys just off the top 100 who will mature and be real prospects.

Looks like a 9-4 stretch to me. If they activate The Incredible Jelks in there, 11-2?

I shudder at the thought of him delivering news of being sent down to Charlotte like this.

It's a Memento reference, but if you're explaining, you're losing. I took it down.

Ok, I will break my own rule, and answer your post this once. I guess the game I'm "playing" is trying to provide info without really throwing an opinion around. This is all Fangraphs has in their prospects section on Rodriguez. You seem to have an entire conversation going on in your head that I'm not part of. Understanding what the GM might be trying to accomplish, and waiting before trashing a move - translates to fluffing, hyping, or actually being Chris Getz - to you. When I respond, you aggressively taunt and troll, to the point where I become part of the "you guys" that is being accused of ruining a thread with a petty argument. I don't want to participate in that, so As-salamu alaykum.

Victim complex? LOL. Dude, that actually happened. If you want to scold me for something, at least learn what the terms you're throwing around mean. I should stop here, because 3 or 4 admins will start taunting me for a few pages, then accuse me of ruining the thread.

The Astros seem to have a glut of RH-bat outfielders, and Julks was at the bottom of their list. They DFAed him to grab old friend Alex Speas off waivers.

I have logically defended Chris Getz's tenure as director of player development. And when I calmly answered the taunts of 4-5 of you, all y'all became sad, and deleted the string. I gave Seby Zavala as an example of a catcher whose defense was developed in organization - and you pretend I'm calling him an All-Star, or something. I get it. The hatred for Getz is such that every single move has to be thoroughly bashed as incompetent and panicky. But your rage now has you and SS2k5 stalking my comments, making sure I don't hurt anyone's feelings by not bashing Getz enough.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0209144/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_1_tt_7_nm_0_q_memento

Today is Rafael Ortega's 33rd birthday. Happy Birthday, dude.

No. "Logical baseball opinions" is written inside the heart.

Rodriguez - from Fangraphs: Rodriguez is a 20-year-old, 6-foot-2 righty who dominated the 2023 DSL with an 88-90 mph fastball and an above-average curveball.

nevermind

So maybe he's the weak side of a RF platoon when Robert comes back and Pham is traded?

Fangraphs: 18. Corey Julks, RF Drafted: 8th Round, 2017 from Houston (HOU) Age 27.3 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 185 Bat / Thr R / R FV 40 Tool Grades (Present/Future) Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw 40/40 55/55 45/50 50/50 40/40 60 Houston really let Julks air out at High-A through about 150 games combined in 2018 and 2019, so when played resumed in 2021, he was an old-for-the-level guy at Double-A who had an over-the-fence power breakout, nearly doubling his career home run total by yanking out 14 bombs. Julks followed that up with a 31-homer campaign with Triple-A Sugar Land in 2022, but his .270/.351/.503 line was only good for a 108 wRC+ in the hitter-friendly PCL. He played his way onto the big league roster during the spring of 2023, and even though the Astros’ right-handed redundancy makes his presence there tenuous, Julks should get to enough power to play a small, short-side platoon role in an outfield corner throughout his career. His swing is geared to pull in the extreme, and Julks is great at snatching inner third fastballs even though his leg kick is big and elaborate. He’s going to pepper the Crawford Boxes with lots of hard contact — so many of his 2022 homers were tucked into the left field corner. As you might guess because he’s so pull-heavy, Julks tends to swing inside a lot of sliders. He has the athletic ability to bend at the waist, dive to the outer part of the plate and power the ball the other way, but it’s rare for him to stay on sliders long enough to do that. You’ll see oppo pop more often on middle-away fastballs. Though not an especially good defender, Julks has a strong arm. He’s a nice complement to a lefty-hitting platoon partner of some kind, but the Astros don’t really have that on their active roster.