Goober

Yeah you were

QUOTE (Y2HH @ Mar 14, 2011 -> 05:51 PM) I don't even know what this is supposed to mean. IIRC can apply to a lot of things, including reading information in a book, or even on the interwebs. Since when did this apply only to things that were told to you? You stated it as if you were recalling a fact, which I found odd considering these scientists are saying something completely contradictory to that

QUOTE (Y2HH @ Mar 14, 2011 -> 02:14 PM) IIRC, Plato made up Atlantis in his writings to examine/explain a hypothetical situation... If you recall correctly? What, you were around back then and he told you so or something?

Are you sure he's yours

Got a P90X to pop at ya

Beep beep beep

QUOTE (mmmmmbeeer @ Aug 16, 2010 -> 02:09 PM) It's nothing more than a study of probabilities dressed in fancy names. Much like the comprehension of probabilities allows actuaries and gamblers to successfully predict an outcome more often than those unaware of probabilities, they are still surprised when John Doe has a heart attack at age 32 or 3 aces pop up in the flop of a game of Texas HoldEm. I guess my point is that I feel that Sabr has value to the game but not nearly as much as is impressed upon us by its rabid community of followers. Some of the stats are deserving of the praise while others are not even close to ready for mainstream acceptance. Extremely well said, I agree.

Dead Silence

No, they are just impractical and somewhat inane

Below average fan

Does not

Food is good.

Prove it.

Neat.

This site says the species of grass for some of them: http://www.ballparks.com/baseball/index.htm

Who

QUOTE (T R U @ Jun 13, 2010 -> 03:52 AM) this thread has zero potential and because we were asked to spare feelings, I will leave out the second part of my joke.. Haha, nice

Awesome, thank you

QUOTE (T R U @ Apr 25, 2010 -> 02:16 PM) What the hell is this? This isn't the type of Tim post I am use to seeing.. Haha, sorry. Give me an example of a Tim post and I'll satisfy

QUOTE (iamshack @ Apr 25, 2010 -> 12:12 AM) Using mine as we type... Ouch, I'm sorry.

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Apr 22, 2010 -> 04:07 PM) So... Konerko's health is an issue (even though he's been highly reliable), but Pods' isn't? Pods and Pierre are roughly the same player, except Pods is older and has more injury history. You can't ignore that in the analysis of the decision. 1 year, 4 months, 3 weeks, 6 days older. One could also notice how Podsednik has played 896 career games while Pierre has played 1449. Pierre has much more pertinent 'mileage' on him.

I don't like you

JPINAA

ednik

QUOTE (Felix @ Apr 4, 2010 -> 05:17 PM) I would hope so. IRC chat >>>>>> java chat Of course, I don't remember what network it was on.. so if someone had that info, I'd give them some sugar. Server: irc.wyldryde.org Channel: #SoxTalk.com (irc://irc.wyldryde.org/SoxTalk.com)