nitetrain8601

Even worse, it's Kenny's fault for fkn up the drafts.

The worst thing about that whole thing was Hawk showed more emotion than the whole Sox team combined all year.

QUOTE(Soxfest @ Jun 24, 2007 -> 03:36 PM) I do not get CSN tell me how Hawk is doing on this! He's like "That's just BS." He might have a heart attack.

Ozzie's such a puss now. Jay Mariotti made him soft. START A f***IN FIGHT

Should've never fired the last guy then if you're going to pull the same ole bs. This guy might actually be worse.

QUOTE(FlaCWS @ Jun 24, 2007 -> 11:52 AM) I didn't see this posted here. Maybe I missed it. http://www.suntimes.com/sports/baseball/wh...T-sox24.article I just don't see how or why you trade Buehrle. Man up and pay the man what he deserves. Period. I would be contacting every team in baseball about CONTRERAS and VAZQUEZ right now. Everyone talks about how they were signed so cheaply... well we know the reason for that, but maybe there's two sucker GMs out there so desperate for starting pitching that they'll take these medicore guys and their salaries off our hands. Then we'll have plenty more cash to put toward Buehrle... and Garland after that. You build around young pitching and with those guys and Danks, we have some good ones. You won't get much for either one, plus doesn't Jose have a no-trade clause?

I rather see him on the Yanks simply because Red Sox fans piss me off.

QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 22, 2007 -> 03:30 PM) I think it's interesting that Hawk used a very peculiar voice when he told Sox fans to not be surprised by anything they do. FWIW, I heard something yesterday that we might be surprised at who the first Sox starter traded is. Hopefully it's Buehrle.

QUOTE(Kalapse @ Jun 22, 2007 -> 03:24 PM) Just DFA him already. But he's a grinder!

TRADE HIM

QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 22, 2007 -> 08:51 AM) Carl Everett is a saint compared to Milton Bradley. The last thing we need to add to this team is someone that can't stay healthy for more than a month. Everett was a great team player and he helped clubhouse morale, though alot of people wouldn't like to acknowledge it.

QUOTE(Brian @ Jun 22, 2007 -> 08:50 AM) I agree that Vince is a horrible PE but thank God it's a TV SHOW! Can't believe nobody else mentioned Rubenstein's cocaine story about why there is no more money. That was hilarious, especially when they showed the "amateur video"

QUOTE(DonnyDevito @ Jun 9, 2007 -> 01:40 PM) i'm twisted on this issue. AJ shows emotion, which our team needs but he does some stupid things like call out Ozzie and Toby Hall through the media. since buehrle and aj got into it, we've sucked goat balls. When did they get into it and about what??

QUOTE(BearSox @ Jun 7, 2007 -> 04:49 PM) He reminds me of ANdrew Sisco, but thats just me. He's the size of Andrew Sisco, but he reminds me of MacDougal of Aardsma. A reliever nonetheless.

QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Jun 7, 2007 -> 04:46 PM) Sucks that Jackson got taken. Sounded like a damn solid SS prospect which we could desperately use, but it wasn't worth reaching for him at 25. I don't think he would've been a reach. Anything around 18 or below would've been a great slot for him IMHO. Everyone I wanted though will be taken LOL at Shannon Stewart. STEAL!

QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 7, 2007 -> 04:31 PM) What's the more annoying argument: - if you know so much, then why aren't you managing in the majors? or - if you think such and such team is so good, then why don't you become a fan of that team? Both are terribly crappy considering we're pissed because we care for this team. You think we're pissed about what the Giants are doing? I'm not because I don't give a hoot about them. I care for the White Sox and about our GM putting them in the best position to succeed on all accounts.

QUOTE(29thandPoplar @ Jun 7, 2007 -> 03:57 PM) If the SS is still there, Jackson, they will take him is my guess. What pick do we have in this round? I'd love Jackson or Borbon or Burgess, but Burgess should go quick.

QUOTE(Steve9347 @ Jun 7, 2007 -> 03:53 PM) hmmmm... one plus pitch four plus pitches??? gee, which one has more upside? Obviously the one with only 1 pitch.

QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Jun 7, 2007 -> 03:47 PM) And it's not like the Tigers are so much more f***ing wealthy than the Sox. That's my point. This team continues to draft a mediocre team.

Maybe KW needs to be demoted to Asst GM, we could bring in a guy who knows what he's doing, and fire the rest of the scouts.

QUOTE(WhiteSoxfan1986 @ Jun 7, 2007 -> 03:36 PM) I'm not too happy with Poreda, but I'm not really too mad about the pick. I guess I have low expectations from the last couple of years. At least we got a guy with upside instead of a #4 starter. An upside as a reliever at best. This is a terrible f***in pick.

*Claps for KW*

QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Jun 7, 2007 -> 03:34 PM) Yeah, as I've said, I'm not too upset -- there certaintly is projectability. I would have loved to have Smoker or Griffith, though. It's simple. If Poreda is a bust, we won't have to worry about the current collection of crosscheckers and scouts making any more decisions. If Minnesota or Detroit picks Smoker, Griffith, Harvey, or Porcello, we may be in trouble for quite a long time. So we're in trouble because God knows that Minny and Detroit actually have scouts that know what they're doing.

WTF?dgskfjksldfhjksahjfkja

QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 7, 2007 -> 03:24 PM) I'm going to cry if we take Jackson. Why? I mean I want Porcello, but let's be realistic, we just ain't taking him. Jackson would be great.