bmags

Aaron Brooks. Alex Smith?

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Dec 28, 2016 -> 06:15 PM) The Bears giving up the 4th pick somehow for JimG seems like the Jags taking Bortles to me. Seemed like an overdraft to lots of people at the time but people justified it by saying "If you've gotten your QB it's worth the price". Both are probably true. That's too high of a price to pay, but if you are in a position where you have to gamble to save your job - taking no action at the QB spot or drafting a QB gives them a 100% chance of being fired while trading for G gives them a 75% chance of being fired, you do the math. Can anyone give me a recent example of a team signing or trading for another team's backup QB to be a starter and having it work out well? I just scrolled through the top 25 QBs this week and the only one that might describe is Tyrod Taylor. Hasselback

QUOTE (shipps @ Dec 28, 2016 -> 04:13 PM) Not sure I want to go down the rabbit hole of debating this but I personally don't feel like they would be idiots for not making that trade. Schwarber has the potential to be a top three power hitter in all of baseball IMO and isnt far away from that right now. Not to mention the guy proved he could do it on the biggest of stages. Let alone giving two of their starting lineup for a starting pitcher when they are already have three top 5 pitchers in NL

Good and relevant: http://southside.locals.baseballprospectus...2017-white-sox/

QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ Dec 28, 2016 -> 02:02 PM) Fangraphs actually has them currently projected as 5th in the AL just behind the Yankees. Their bullpen is nothing special but I think their rotation will actually be OK if they don't get hit too hard with the injury bug again. I think they'll be better than many think this year, a Wildcard isn't out of the question if a couple things go right, and they'll have money to spend in the next two offseasons. I don't think blowing it up is the right move. I don't really see getting a big boatload of prospects for Trout as improving their situation. I highly doubt their combined value would surpass Trout's unless they got really lucky. I agree. And next year the FA class will let them compete again. MiGo could be a good target for them this year as depth.

FWIW I do that trade every day. Interesting premise though holding the risk like that.

If Moreno turns the spigot back on the next two off seasons provide plenty to build a winner. I hope they do.

Pure entertainment: Would you trade (you personally) Quintana to Angels for the rights to Mike Trout for his 2019 and 2020 seasons? That's it! Four years of Q for two years of Mike Trout. Trout and Quintana would be on same team for two seasons.

Oh I found the cubs thread though, was that what we were looking for?

QUOTE (Leonard Zelig @ Dec 28, 2016 -> 12:17 PM) Can someone point me toward to Jose Quintana trade thread? I could swear it was here somewhere. I just put it down...

Angels I just assumed could not pay but hell, they could make a trade work. Their farm was so reminiscent of ours 4-5 years ago where their top 5 are just their most recent draft picks. But Taylor ward is interesting.

I was just going through the entire league in my head and was thinking how I can't think of a good fit for Robertson outside of Nats or Mets. Is there another suitor you all can think of? Blue jays?

QUOTE (Al Lopez's Ghost @ Dec 28, 2016 -> 10:30 AM) I'll just add that our 2016 draft was outstanding. Collins, Burdi, Hansen, Call and another guy I can't think of right now just add to the talent Hahn is obtaining. The future- the near future- is bright. Fisher and Curbelo

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 28, 2016 -> 10:24 AM) We will be looking at a 70 to 75 win team in 2018. So in two years we are already where we are now and on the up and up? Sounds good.

QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Dec 28, 2016 -> 10:06 AM) Nah. I guess I could be clearer but ill never freak out about rushing someone to the majors because I'm worried about their development or they're not ready or whatever. If you don't want to start their service time then that's a different thing. It depends. Was fine with TA callup, but Fulmer/Rodon were up too early and especially Rodon I wish could have worked out change up in AAA

QUOTE (Con te Giolito @ Dec 28, 2016 -> 10:00 AM) Never had an OPS over .800, didn't have a higher OPS than Melky last year. So a few nice throws from RF made him one of the best 20 players in baseball? Not buying it at all. Sox should've sold high on him rebuilding or not and glad they got what they did. This is about the time where we get our daily rumor that leads to rampant excitement and eventually dies off around 2 or 3 PM as the reality of not trading Quintana for yet another day sinks in. Just get this over with for gods sakes. Maybe, but on April last year it felt like Eaton was singlehandedly winning is games like few players could.

QUOTE (NCsoxfan @ Dec 28, 2016 -> 09:48 AM) Excerpt from a Buster Olney insider article: "The industry perception of the White Sox is that they made a home run trade of Sale, in what they got back from the Boston Red Sox -- acquiring highly touted infield prospect Yoan Moncada, pitching prospect Michael Kopech and minor leaguers Luis Alexander Basabe and Victor Diaz. The assumption is that they will probably be able to do the same with Quintana, who is under team control for four seasons at a tremendous rate. Rival execs say the asking price is enormous, but the White Sox are in a position to wait until someone says yes, even if that means carrying the process into spring training. This makes me call BS on the supposed trade with the Astros that was turned down. I think they're asking for more than the Musgrove package. Thanks. Re: last paragraph, I think it just depends how you rate Musgrove.

QUOTE (Con te Giolito @ Dec 28, 2016 -> 09:38 AM) Before the trades the Sox were a bottom third system despite sucking for 5 years. You're saying sucking for 3 years will give them a bunch of draft picks that will improve the system, but if that's the case then why didn't sucking for the last 5 years improve the system? Part of this is moving players very aggressively, we had been up to 12 before several graduations. The other part was a 2015 draft with only one pick in first four rounds (erwin gone)

We'll be good soon.

Great article summing up how I feel. Still at edge of my seat. http://www.southsidesox.com/2016/12/28/140...tana-rumor-mill

QUOTE (reiks12 @ Dec 28, 2016 -> 08:31 AM) Yes, Twitterbis where im reading all the posts. Reddit to a lesser extent but they are more knowledgeable overall. I just keep in mind that white Sox twitter is usually prett mouth breathing

I'm guessing twitter is where the "pitchfork" yankee fans are? Pinstripealley and Riveraveblues have been very excited as a whole.

I was going to get this too. Recent versions have become way too prospect heavy. You literally could not trade Sale for Moncada straight up let alone a 4 for 1

QUOTE (shipps @ Dec 27, 2016 -> 03:58 PM) I really believe the majority of the time they do. Over the years around here how many times when talk is about other teams prospects and guys are sooooo in love with some prospects that are definitely untouchable...then you never hear about them again or their status dropped significantly within a few months? Saying Meadows is untouchable isn't implying he's better than Quintana, it's just saying that team isn't trading him. We've heard a hell of a lot of Glasnow mentioned, never Meadows. People are just figuring out what the real market is, not making judgment calls on our players. If those posters you mentioned were wrong that a player was untouchable, they would be proven right if that player was still on that team. I imagine what's happening is the Pirates view Meadows as their CF of future and number one prospect, and are trying to do anything to keep him. Bregman otoh, Astros have seemed to make a decision that no upgrade is worth losing him.

I've enjoyed reading Yankees fans the last two weeks.