Everything posted by bmags
-
2016-2017 NBA Thread
Rose is okay according to Noah. Good news. Especially that it's not bulls headache.
-
2016-2017 NBA Thread
QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Jan 9, 2017 -> 09:21 PM) If I weren't certain it was the first one I wouldn't have posted it. Of course I hope the dude is ok. I have to say, what pissed me off was your number 3 and I realized after you meant it in orgy sense
-
2016-2017 NBA Thread
QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Jan 9, 2017 -> 09:12 PM) He got benched in the 4th the other night. Three options: - he's sulking and being a baby - he's dead - he's gang banging Shall we start a poll? Grow up man
-
Sox holding talks "daily" on Q
"Our rotation is set"
-
Sox holding talks "daily" on Q
Guys if Meadows was already on the table Q would be a pirate.
-
Sox holding talks "daily" on Q
QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Jan 9, 2017 -> 08:11 PM) 3 prospects, but no Meadows? Ehhhh. I could only imagine Glasnow, Bell and Newman would be the offer in that case. But if we're only taking three, I want Meadows. The tweet is great because it is nothing remarkable. Sox want Meadows? Pirates are offering prospects? We knew none of this! Edit: not criticizing rumbunter just not going to get in a tizzy over the info which largely boils down to "pirates interested in Q"
-
Sox holding talks "daily" on Q
We gonna get our rumbunter on again? https://twitter.com/rumbunter/status/818638418213224449
-
Melky Cabrera thread
So basically the article is showalter saying they want another LH hitter but then the reporter showing how terrible they were vs LH pitching :shrug: But either way Melky is a switch hitter, does not strike out much (which showalter mentiones) and is a terrible fit in basically every other way.
-
Melky Cabrera thread
QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Jan 9, 2017 -> 04:01 PM) I'm confused. If it says they are seeking another left-handed bat, why are you showing his stats vs Left handed pitching? Actually I'm confused too, the artilce is talking about negating all of the top LH pitching with sale/price, etc.
-
Melky Cabrera thread
Ridiculous idea that for money reasons isn't a fit at all...on the other hand: http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles...0109-story.html "Orioles manager Buck Showalter still seeking another left-handed bat in outfield" Melky vs LH .322 .352 .496 .847
-
Sox holding talks "daily" on Q
QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Jan 9, 2017 -> 03:51 PM) Is Kopech really that far away? I was under the assumption that he would be in Chicago some time in 2018. He may, but he's still going to have significant innings limits on that point. He is 20 and has never pitched above 65 innings.
-
Sox holding talks "daily" on Q
QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 9, 2017 -> 03:45 PM) That's why I said I'll take one pitcher back, but I am hesitant on that because the logjam is building. If you take back a top prospect as the 2nd guy also, even if he's way down in A-ball, then you're counting on something bad to happen to several of them by 2019 and that's not a very good use of resources. Come on, since the only benchmark we have is cubs on this board, that's like saying drafting Schwarber was just counting on failure of their hitting prospects. You get talent because they are talented.
-
Sox holding talks "daily" on Q
QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 9, 2017 -> 03:34 PM) I would say Kopech has that 5th spot by the end of 2018, but even if he doesn't, you've forgotten Carson Fulmer. You're fully correct that it isn't guaranteed that they will develop into MLB pitchers, but you are missing how we will actually know that - it will require big league innings. If they do not get big league innings then they will not develop into good MLB pitchers. That's where the limits come from. Yes, a couple of those guys could flop, but they're not going to flop against AAA hitters, and even if they do you're still going to move them up and challenge them eventually. I think it's the kopech part that I disagree with mostly. Kopech is legit two years away just getting arm strength up. He just hasn't pitched much. So if he is up toward end of 2018 bullpen sounds pretty real regardless. Dunning is A ball. And Lopez/Fulmer have legitimate starter or bullpen? questions that we would have 2 years to answer then. And potential TJS. If we acquired 4 position player prospects i'd be happy but I don't think we are screwed with pitcher spots yet, not with the likelihood a few are in a ball and we know how big the AA jump is.
-
Sox holding talks "daily" on Q
QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 9, 2017 -> 03:24 PM) When everyone but Kopech has already had stints at least in AAA and the big leagues? High. Every one of those guys will be arriving in the big leagues by the end of 2018 unless they go down for a full season with an injury, and one thing we both have confidence in this organization doing is avoiding TJS. These aren't guys starting off at A-ball. These are guys who are going to get a stint in the big leagues by 2018 even if they have poor starts to 2017. Rodon, Fulmer, Giolito, and Turner will be in your rotation early in the 2018 season at the latest, and Kopech most likely by the end of the year, if not to start 2019. Glasnow will be in a big league rotation on opening day of this year. Lopez?
-
2017 Democratic Thread
It is just so ridiculous they are pushing these nominees prior to the OGE report.
-
Sox holding talks "daily" on Q
Discussion fodder: http://m.mlb.com/news/article/213069958/po...-jose-quintana/ edit: don't be mad at me when you get to the end and wonder why the hell you read that
-
Update: Luis Robert has been cleared according to Rosenthal
So I read the article again, I think the reference to the White Sox is if he is not cleared by June 15th, i.e. if he is apart of the 2017 international signing period that features the likes of the Cubs, Dodgers, Giants, royals, Astros, Athletics, Braves, Cardinals, Nationals, Padres and Red Sox not being able to sign anyone for more than 300k. If it's before then, then it tilts toward the Astros, athletics, braves, cards, nats, pads, etc etc who could just continue exceeding the pool. edit: read it again including the paragraph before:
-
Sox holding talks "daily" on Q
If all the sox wanted was a top 30 position player, top 70 pitching prospect and two bullpen arms the sox could get that deal.
-
Sox holding talks "daily" on Q
QUOTE (NCsoxfan @ Jan 9, 2017 -> 02:37 PM) aren't you guys glad the Sale trade didn't stretch this long? It stretched from July 1st onward tbh.
-
Sox holding talks "daily" on Q
QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ Jan 9, 2017 -> 02:10 PM) This doesn't really detract from your point but the best outfield in baseball is clearly the Angels' outfield. Well, stupid mike trout dragging Cameron Maybin's ass upward
-
Sox holding talks "daily" on Q
QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jan 9, 2017 -> 02:12 PM) Position players prospects would be great. I'd love it personally. Well, if we traded for position players, we'd still be totally screwed because their window would close and what are we going to do to re-sign them? Ugh, we should trade collins now for a younger player just to keep this window open as long as possible.
-
Sox holding talks "daily" on Q
QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jan 9, 2017 -> 02:04 PM) The one who has to trade its best player for financial reasons to make a trade for Q? And has a top ten CF prospect ready to step in its place?
-
Sox holding talks "daily" on Q
New CBA shows severe restriction on consistently being above the luxury tax. Significant restrictions on overspending on INTL. Those same teams are loading up prospects because they can't afford to spend their way through victories anymore. Remember when EE to boston was a done deal? Yeah they are going to the season replacing David Ortiz with Mitch Moreland. There's no reason to throw up our hands and say woe is us. Edit: oh yeah, and EE went and signed with CLEVELAND
-
Sox holding talks "daily" on Q
The pirates window is closing? We talking about the team we are crying about to include their two top hitting prospects in addition to their 2 top 50 pitching prospects and have the best outfield in baseball?
-
Update: Luis Robert has been cleared according to Rosenthal
http://www.baseballamerica.com/internation...l7qhZ49hsvhS.97 So we had 3.443 million, and know we spent 2 million So if the latter 3 were 100k or less, then we could have 1.1 million to spend.