Jump to content

bmags

Admin
  • Posts

    62,049
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    148

Everything posted by bmags

  1. Wait, how are you doing this? Are you turning all strikeouts into walks?
  2. Right, but the idea that there would be no errors is false. It would have less, but it too would have errors that may fall in line to a bias. THe technology isn't perfect yet.
  3. Shifting body momentum to go other way and back and track ball. The depth there is farther than you suggest. The ball would need to be thrown fast it's true.
  4. I'll have to listen. I am, to say the least, starting to worry.
  5. I still think that's wrong, if he leads him high and to the right it would be incredibly hard. Burton also could have started running in. One of those things you hope gets better as they run.
  6. "Bears first 15 plays were phenomenal almost as if they had the 1st 15 plays scripted " Should I read this as sarcasm?
  7. When I saw Lombardi criticize Trubisky I suddenly felt very, very good about things. I love the athletic, but hiring Jim Bowden and Lombardi were two terrible hires.
  8. Maybe it was their strategy of cutting all of their young players to sign old ones this offseason. Nice way to force a rebuild.
  9. First time coaches 0-7 for first time since 2001.
  10. Go for it Jose. Anything to pull september out of the duldrums.
  11. Everytime comcast calls me the number now has the same first 6 digits as my own. Is that legal?
  12. I mean a lot of it and if you want a scary thought: if our top two cbs go down our starters are bryce callahan and marcus cooper *shudders* edit: wrote marcus coopers name as john
  13. Is there a good explainer on the buxton situation? Is there a similarity to it here?
  14. Yeah this all seems reasonable to me, and that scares me. I'm a bit shook right now. We made it through the first year of rebuild with no prospect taking significant step back through either injury or play. Well, regression hit hard this year.
  15. The lack of burton was mystifying to me. I thought pack may make concerted effort to take away middle of field since trubisky has not shown he'll burn you out wide and maybe that was case. Again, scary to me the packers shifted to zone and bears had no ability to recognize pre-snap. I thought that was the benefit of this offense.
  16. The difference to me is that Watson has shown that he can throw up big numbers in a game. I expect highs and lows but the highs for trubisky have been nothing you couldn't get from signing someone like Tyrod Taylor or other free agent qb tier acquisitions. Okay, he can controlt he ball, but he rarely throws over 200 yards and has terrible time finding end zone. Those should be "low" games but instead we say that is a decent game.
  17. Mitch’s press conference he was saying Packers switched to zone and bears kept calling plays for man. uh, wasn’t that the point of our new pre snap motions to identify that and not run bad plays?
  18. I get it, but it does scare me that Trubisky has looked so bad in big moments.
  19. At some point, Bears are going to have to win games. It’s been 4 years.
×
×
  • Create New...