IlliniKrush

Wow, that's pretty crazy. I can't believe he did that, i hope legal action is taken. He should have completely rescheduled or said "we'll do this again tomorrow" or something, that wasn't a very good move on his part.

Yes it's a weak goal, Khabibulin takes one step out to play the angle and it's stopped. Or if he doesn't think it's going wide and actually moves his blocker, it's stopped. While it was an accurate shot, it was totally Khabibulin's fault and that angle shot should never go in. He didn't 'beat' him.

If they handled him properly, yes. They didn't put him in the best position to succeed. Comparing him to Ritchie is way off.

6 on the second part, 13/20 total score.

Math competition? That had to be 'good' TV... I guess some kid got the word 'facade'. Are you serious? Facade?

Spiff, that Iginla goal was a weak goal as well, way 'cheaper' than St. Louis'. Khabibulin just completely misplayed it. That was a very good game, let's see if Tampa can show up for more than one period in game 6, Khabibulin saved their ass.

I'd rather throw Diaz every game then let Abbott toe the rubber. Foul :puke

We are?

Ah, the memories. I was in the car on the way home listening to Hughes and Santo describe it. Hughes - "They are inspecting the bat" Santo - "This isn't good"...."This is bad"..."Uh oh this isn't good" Booya

Yes, best player in this city behind every Cub, and some of their AAA players. LMAO, nice call.

I talked about this same thing in another thread a few days ago about how it will take the Sox a bit more to get Garcia right now, because by giving up Garcia they would be forfeiting all possible deals at the trade deadline, when action for Garcia will naturally increase.

Jurko just messed up Mark "Buerhle"

Jurko vs Harry on espn1000 right now, they are playing spelling bee with sports names.

It depends on what money he's asking for exactly, and if we sign Maggs, etc. Few factors to consider in this. But if nothing else, that's not a bad price to pay for a "rent-a-player" at all. He could help take us very far, contract or no contract.

Rauch and/or Rowand and Borchard? Um, do it. Sooner than later. "I certainly think they'll get a shot at some pretty good prospects at the upper level, but I don't think they'll take someone's premium guy," said one GM. "It depends on the teams in the hunt, and how much they need pitching. Teams will overreact at times." Nice find.

20+ games is a large enough number for me, i don't know about anyone else. We're not playing a 500 game schedule. The logic is just flawed. "But schoe and garland are effective and you want to make them a 5?" Pure hypothetical, i'd make Loaiza our 5 and Buehrle our 4 if it was easily possible (again, hypothetical). This would allow your rotation to be absolute dynamite. You wouldn't be hurting your rotation because Buerhle was "only a 4" and Loaiza "only a 5" now. You want the best 5 man rotation possible. Buehrle, ELo, X, Garland, Schoe, is better than Buehrle, ELo, Garland, Schoe, "Sure fire loss guy"

Makes sense. Man, if you were a Brewers fan and they got rid of Sexson (albeit the deal has panned out well) and then Sheets? I mean, the sausage race only draws a crowd for a little while, eventually you need to keep some of your talent.

No way IRod is going anywhere

When the division is decided by less than 5 games, you'll want to have a player that "affects" 15-20 games. I completely disagree with you. I'd rather have Garland or Schoe as my 5, it means we have a dependable guy throwing out there. Have you seen our 5th starters so far? What do you suggest we do? Besides, if the Sox want to do more than just win the division, they'll need another top of the rotation guy. Only 15-20 games? I really don't know what to say to this.

They beat the twins bro

Forgive him, he's caught DRays fever

That's a DRays winner

Mine are like .99 each.

Those numbers are shocking. Wow.

Spell some sports figures correctly: http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/sportsnation...ia?event_id=753 I got 7/10