southsider2k5

It really makes the payment they made for Gio and ReyLo last year all of the more stupid, as if it wasn't already stupid when they did it.

This one might not happen. Going to be storms rolling through this evening.

I mean there is no reason we couldn't do both if we really wanted to do so. We could trade him early for the best return, and try to sign him when he hits free agency in a year and a half.

That and some people feel that true embarrassment might force actual change, and not just a new stooge running the organization in basically the same way as the last one.

I said nothing. I posted the stat and left it to Soxtalk to decide what to do with it.

My point was that you did exactly what you used every trite trope and made up fear factor from the last 8 years in the form of a long post as an attempt to justify your approach while denigrating others who do the exact same thing, which proved my point very nicely. You are as much of a social justice warrior as any of the people who you spent all of that time being condescending and dismissive to in own post.

Who do you think told Getz to cut spending in the first place? The Pope?

Trades in May are super rare.

Almost missed it

For me it's about three things. -Hording long term talent -Turning short term players into long term talent -developing long term talents Wins are nice, but not really important in the grand scheme of things.

Putting the two things together it probably means he isn't letting loose yet and is trying to get comfortable by making more contact vs an all out swing.

12-28 is a weird idea of "fun", but sure, have "fun".

NiCe TaLk BrO

Mostly because he isn't good enough to play anymore.

Even Moldy got a hit.

Can't GIDP if you don't swing the bat.