Dick Allen

QUOTE (Jake @ Dec 22, 2013 -> 10:06 PM) Huh? Nothing is Jay's fault. He is flawless. surround him with an all pro line, with all pro receivers and an all pro running back, give him an excellent OC and head coach, he will show you how good he is.

QUOTE (chw42 @ Dec 22, 2013 -> 10:05 PM) Put in McCown? No. He might get hurt.

QUOTE (Jake @ Dec 22, 2013 -> 10:04 PM) Boykin surprises Jay Cutler with "the most basic zone defense ever created" That isn't Jay's fault. That't on Trestman. If he called a running play, that INT never would have happened.

It will be interesting to see how Emery plans to fix this defense. They need help everywhere.

QUOTE (scs787 @ Dec 22, 2013 -> 09:52 PM) Please let us know, because I think it's getting overblown. I think it is fair to say 1 for sure, probably 2, are his fault.

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Dec 22, 2013 -> 09:40 PM) Clearly the problem in today's game is Jay Cutler. The Bears would have 59 points if McCown had started. Forte has been awful.

I am thinking all this trouble getting the ball snapped over the years that has been blamed on the coaching staff, might be misguided. It didn't happen with McCown.

Hold the ball a little longer Jay,

Blowout. I wonder if the Eagles will punt tonight.

At least I will get to bed early.

Nice pass rush.

I think the Bears will need at least 40 tonight.

QUOTE (pettie4sox @ Dec 19, 2013 -> 06:53 PM) The rental agreement between him and I states it's month to month. I would get a small storage locker for a couple of months and put his s*** in there. It would probably cost you less than $100, and that should be reasonable enough for him to get someone to pick it up. By then you should have a better idea of his fate.

QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Dec 19, 2013 -> 12:24 PM) Deadspin takes aim at Dan Bernstein. http://deadspin.com/derrick-rose-isnt-a-vi...dium=socialflow I don't think Bernstein is all that wrong . He is just blasting the wrong guy. The two things I think are common knowledge, some seem to ignore. First, if the Bulls are "rebuilding" it isn't going to be a 3 or 4 year process. They will be trying to win next season. Second, Derrick Rose isn't necessarily the bad guy here. Sure he can be questioned, but IMO, he is just a rather naive person who thinks his brother has all the brains, and he is letting him run the show. Any controversy is all Reggie Rose. He has had a bad reputation for years. This is a dumb athlete listening to his even dumber older brother. Nothing more, nothing less. Blast Derrick for letting Reggie run the show, that is totally fair.

QUOTE (raBBit @ Dec 19, 2013 -> 09:55 AM) I don't know, it may be true but it's too early to tell. The guy has never broke a story or anything and has tweeted about the Sox as a fan very recently. I hope it is true but I'd wait for some more concrete evidence. If he is making it up, tweeting Scott Downs to the White Sox to gain some attention is pretty pathetic.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Dec 19, 2013 -> 09:08 AM) Was Lee's arm anywhere near Viciedo's? I don't recall it being that way, and if I'm right then if Viciedo could catch the ball as often as Carlos Lee, he'd be a much more effective fielder because he'd pick up some extra assists and he'd cut down on a lot of people taking extra bases. No, Lee was a bad fielder, but did make all the routine plays, something as you pointed out, would really help Viciedo. It is funny the both were 3B, who were converted to LF who eventually probably should be 1B/DH. Lee was a better baserunner before he got really big.

QUOTE (coco1997 @ Dec 19, 2013 -> 08:55 AM) Who is the guy who 'broke' this? Does he have any credibility? Who knows, but I think there is probably a better chance than a normal random tweet of being true. I don't think there is a big market in breaking Scott Downs news.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Dec 19, 2013 -> 08:50 AM) I'd say wait until at least 2014 to decide whether to move him to DH as well. He was, like almost everyone else on this team, a more reliable fielder in 2012 than in 2013. Usually 23 year olds don't obviously get worse in the field when they get to their 2nd year at a position, they're expected to get better. He didn't, but then again he was on a team where it seemed like everyone in the field also got worse. Even if he doesn't have good range, his throwing arm makes up for quite a few mistakes out there. He can be an average defender in LF or RF if he has poor range and a great throwing arm. If he keeps getting worse out there...fine, move him to DH once Dunn is out of the way...but we should also ask who in the world is coaching this kid if he keeps getting worse in the field as he gets more experience, because that's not how it's supposed to go. He can be Carlos Lee part 2. A converted 3B, who will never be a very good LF, but he can throw and that has offset at least some shortcomings defensively. Obviously, getting to CLee's level offensively is going to be tough, but look at CLee's walk rate as a youngster. The talent is there, it's just a question of whether or not he will put it together. Not unlike several of the players everyone is excited to have added to the roster.

This is why if you have a small child, you do everything you can to get them to throw left handed. This guy has made over $27 million in his career.

QUOTE (SoxAce @ Dec 18, 2013 -> 01:28 PM) If Tanaka had Yu Darvish's stuff, I think many might be more inclined to take on the risk. I like him as a pitcher, but I don't think the sox will take that route. The guy throws 95 and has what many call the best splitter in the world.

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Dec 18, 2013 -> 10:41 AM) I have no problem with them pursuing Tanaka, but this is absolutely the worst argument for it. You simply never know what need might emerge. Maybe Davidson busts and David Wright or Evan Longoria become available for trade. Maybe they develop the assets and save the money to pursue a player like Mike Trout or Bryce Harper. Maybe whoever they draft 3rd this year is extended in 2016 because he's that good. You simply don't know what opportunities will present themself, so spending just to spend is an absolutely terrible philosophy that gets teams in all kinds of trouble. I can't believe I'm actually agreeing with Marty again, but he did say who "better" to spend their money on, not spend it to spend it. If Tanaka is as good as advertised, if you could get him for $100 million, the way the cost of pitching has skyrocketed, he will be a steal. And Sale, Tanaka, Q, Johnson, perhaps a pitcher with the #3 pick is a rotation where a lot can go wrong on the offensive side, and you still will be in really good shape.

QUOTE (fathom @ Dec 18, 2013 -> 10:12 AM) I listened to the Hahn interview this morning, and not once (if I recall) did he mention anything about trying to win the division this year. I was very impressed by this approach. As for Tanaka, no thanks...the cost is just going to be insane. It will be insane but the price of pitching is insane. You can pay this guy $100 million and more than likely be ace/like or you can pay guys like Kazmir $10-11 million a year to most likely suck. This guy is only 25. Unless you just can't afford him, there is absolutely no reason to at least see if you can get him signed, especially when the Sox have Sale under contract for what they would have to pay Grant Balfour at his advanced age.

QUOTE (SoxAce @ Dec 18, 2013 -> 10:17 AM) Well, he's Mexican so I'll give him that much... (I'm half BTW, so that's what I was implying that I like) Is he any relation to Dave Valle, he of the ridiculous hair plugs? I also think Dave Valle was playing for the Mariners when Bo Jackson hit a home run which clinched the division for the Sox in 1993.

While it certainly appears he can't hit, catchers usually do take longer to find their way. It wouldn't kill the Sox to stash him in Charlotte.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 18, 2013 -> 09:55 AM) If he is decent, I can't see him making it out of the AL. I think you meant NL, and he has been DFA'd not waived.