Dick Allen

QUOTE (GreenSox @ Jul 10, 2015 -> 08:16 AM) his K totals are off the charts. I wonder how many swinging strikes he takes v. how many called strikes he takes. With his high walk totals (15% of the time), he's obviously looking for "that pitch" and perhaps overly-willing to sit back down if he doesn't get it. If so, it may be something that he could realistically improve on. His k level was Javier Baez-like last year, even worse, with a lower walk rate. At any rate, if it can be improved, it doesn't appear he is with the team that gets that improvement.

Anyone calling for Matt Davidson should never be able to complain about White Sox prospects anymore. And when he fails, should be suspended if they complain even once. He's hitting .230 and striking out at an incredible clip in his third go around at a level a 22 year old Carlos Sanchez had no problem with.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jul 9, 2015 -> 03:20 PM) "That's going to start David Robertson to work". He didn't start until after the inning began? I bet he can get ready in one batter's time.

QUOTE (chw42 @ Jul 9, 2015 -> 03:14 PM) Why is Jose always swinging at those awful sliders low and away? He didn't do it as much last year. In fact, he crushed sliders last year according to pitch f/x. This year, he's got a negative pitch value on them. I think it's the product of trying to do too much.

Where is the thread when he signed? I don't recall many complaining back then. Weren't the Sox supposed to be in a full rebuild anyway?

QUOTE (raBBit @ Jul 9, 2015 -> 01:48 PM) The way Samardzija has pitched today I am sure the Jays are ready to give up their top three prospects for Samardzija. AA claims he wants to stay out of the rental aisle. What I don't understand is if they are high on him and want him, maybe picking him up before he pitches against them makes sense. If they lose today, that's a game they could have been facing someone from AAA.

QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Jul 9, 2015 -> 01:21 PM) Say we trade Samardzija, what do you think the chances are he would sign with the Sox in the off season? Probably the same as if the Sox keep him until the end of the season.

QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ Jul 9, 2015 -> 11:31 AM) I can't believe the Bulls were even compared to the Sox situation. They had a dynasty in the 90s, have been pretty good over the last decade, have no other Chicago NBA team in town to compete with, only have to fill up the stadium 41 games instead of 81, and have a much lower capacity to fill. Even the pathetic Sox attendance of recent years would be enough to sell out the United Center every night. It's not an even comparison in the slightest. We also need to stop comparing our situation to the Cubs. According to the Cubs' marketing department, 37% percent of their fans are tourists from out-of-state. Wrigley Field is a huge tourist attraction, you take away that from the Cubs and they would have similar attendance woes when they're bad. http://chicagoist.com/2011/07/25/cubs_numb..._percent_of.php This is where you ignoring things. Caulfield likes to say a third of the Cubs attendance are tourists, but then say USCF is 75% Tigers fans or whoever they are playing. So the assumption that everyone at USCF is local is crazy. The other assumption you make is if 37% of the crowd at any particular game are tourists, if those tourists stayed home, those tickets would remain unsold. I don't think that is true for every one of them. Not even close. The Cubs are more popular than the Sox. It's even in this thread people would be more inclined to go to a Sox game if there was a Wrigleyville vibe to the neighborhood.

QUOTE (shysocks @ Jul 9, 2015 -> 11:09 AM) I'm not even referring to whether he should have challenged the play in Detroit. I'm talking specifically about people using "because the player said he should challenge" as a reason he should challenge. It should never be a reason, or only ever a minor consideration at most. That's why they have guys specifically looking at replays. Generally, 99.99% of the time, a runner knows if he is out or safe on the throw to 1B, anyone who ever complains when they are called out on a groundball in the infield and replay confirms it, was just putting on a show. Tags are different. Avi looked like he was out a mile, but the replay showed it to be pretty close.

QUOTE (bmags @ Jul 9, 2015 -> 10:56 AM) I'd be surprised. Bulls backup PG spot has been a prime piece, and Lin would seem to be a big draw in high asian population cities (NY, HOU, LA...charlotte. And DRose hasn't played much the last couple of years. If he is healthy, Lin's playing time is going to be limited at best.

QUOTE (bmags @ Jul 9, 2015 -> 11:04 AM) Robin should have challenged that because he should be aware of what is happening in a baseball game. Doesn't mean he should have challenged this one. Surprisingly, two things can be similar (player asks to challenge) but be different (completely different scenarios and plays). On the same token, every day I wake up and go to bed, but much of the time the day is different! The umpires wouldn't even look at it.

QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jul 9, 2015 -> 10:43 AM) Yeah, I am more pissed about that then this Jordan stuff, haha. I think if the Bulls offered him the same contract, he still goes to Charlotte. More PT, assuming DRose can stay healthy.

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Jul 9, 2015 -> 10:33 AM) The question is simply, how much (if any) has his defense improved at Charlotte? I've pulled multiple reports and watched a few games on MiLB.tv, and I do think there is some improvement there. But the reports are mixed. With defense you need a large sample to work with, and if I add it all up, it looks like small moves. His footwork, both fielding and throwing, still needs improvement - but that is teachable. And please, please, please - stop suggesting OF or 3B for Micah. He doesn't have the arm for either, plus he's had two procedures on his elbow that could be related to throwing. Also, if he's struggled this much at 2B, it would at best take a couple years to get even acceptable at any other position. Oh and, he struggles quite a bit with popups and body placement - put that in the OF? That would not go well. He's 2B or bust. Sanchez doesn't appear to have the bat speed for MLB, which scares me because that (probably) can't be fixed. So I am all for giving Micah another look, assuming there is at least some positive movement defensively. I think he could play LF. Tim Raines was a horrible 2B who couldn't throw who became acceptable out there, but I do think it is pretty much 2B or bust for Micah. They do work with him a lot, but it's a long, no guarantees process.

QUOTE (bmags @ Jul 9, 2015 -> 10:18 AM) Pretty close to safe in baseball means an out. This wasn't running home, the ball wasn't hit that deep, nor too much in the gap. There was no reason to turn and waste an out like that. He has done this continuously...has it ever paid off? He was trying to get in scoring position. Not the brightest move, but again, it was wet, it isn't like the Sox were playing for a divison title...if he was safe, just like the time Eaton came home when he should have been out a mile, people would have praised his aggressiveness. And there is always a possibility he learned something.

QUOTE (bmags @ Jul 9, 2015 -> 10:09 AM) Don't mean to be a downer, last night was fun, but Avi's turn for second was so awful. Everyone in the stadium knew he had no shot. How many hits has he inexplicably run into outs? What stat shows that story? The ball was wet, It wasn't the greatest play, but he was pretty close to safe. It was a good throw. The tag was bad. Would have been interesting to see if the throw was off a bit. He might have been safe, or even out a larger margin.

QUOTE (BrianAnderson @ Jul 9, 2015 -> 10:05 AM) I'm torn on this topic. Obviously the upside to Sanchez is his defense. How many double plays has he turned that Micah wouldn't have? How many balls has he snagged that Micah wouldn't have? How many saved runs has he had on defensecompared to how many runs have we let up with him at the plate instead of Micah? Also, Emilio has been awful? I don't know if I agree with that thought process. Last year he had 430AB, 26 SB, was able to play around the field, etc. The year before he had 460AB, 28SB, year before 30SB, the year before 40SB -- you get my point in a way. Basically since 2011 he's averaged 400AB a year with other MLB teams .... why do the Sox find him so worthless when our combined 2B stats are .192BA?? I don't get how he hasn't got an extended look there yet ....I actually think he gives us the best chance to win at 2B, he's not one of the polar opposites in Sanchez (great D, terrible O) or Johnson (okay O, terrible D). My opinion -- let Emilio get a look at 2B, keep Sanchez up, let him rest and recoup. Maybe try Sanchez one more time near the end of July if Emilio isn't working out --- or as Emilio is gaining trade value --- and then if Sanchez doesn't seize that opportunity let's hope that Micah has learned some fundamentals on D. Have you seen Bonifacio play this season? That would be your answer. He hasn't hit, he can't field, but he can be the 2015 Toby Hall in the dugout. That probably isn't worth $4 million a year. I do think, if they are going to send Sanchez down, they should give Emilio one more shot before bringing back Micah. IMO, the White Sox have to be very confident the next time they call up Micah, it's for good.

The Cubs are not going to trade Baez for 2 months of Samardjiza.

So W "only" charged a wounded vets charity $100k and a private jet to speak at a fundraiser for the people he sent to war. http://news.yahoo.com/help-us-veterans-cha...-225504539.html

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Jul 9, 2015 -> 07:31 AM) How do you smoke pot without possessing it? Does the joint suspend itself in midair while you puff on it? I think the point is you won't get arrested for testing positive with marijuana, but if you have some of it on you, or are growing it in your garage...

QUOTE (ptatc @ Jul 9, 2015 -> 07:13 AM) I'm not. I believe it's considered a drug of abuse due to it's addictuve properties. Baseball put it on the list due to the number of players who use it and it's health hazzards it imposes with regular use. Guys like Darryl Kyle who die from heart attacks in their 30s really shook up baseball. Makes you wonder why alcohol wouldn't be included. I think the deciding factor was legality.

QUOTE (Vance Law @ Jul 8, 2015 -> 05:49 PM) The margin between this team's offense and league average is not tiny. Are you blaming Ventura for the baseball players' hitting? Are you blaming Ventura for rostering the following subpar (to awful) defenders: Micah Johnson Conor Gillaspie Avi Garcia Jose Abreu Melky Cabrera That has been my point all along. if it is Robin's fault, no one should complain about the players. If you think KW put together a horrible team, you can't blame RV for the poor record. If you have to blame KW, RH, RV,JR, you can't blame them all. If it is Robin's managing that is keeping this team from contention, then the other guys have done their job. If KW has taken over and set the Sox back until the next decade, then you can't blame RV when the Sox lose. Good managers don't win with bad players. Bad GMs don't put together teams that should win but don't because of the manager.

The way to fix this is to actually let players sign contracts right away. Either delay free agency a week, or move up the date you can sign.

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Jul 8, 2015 -> 12:32 PM) I'm sure at some point people who have run out of other things to complain about will start complaining, but "Blackhawk" has never been a derisive term the way "Redskin" has, so I don't see the complaining generating any sort of similar results. I think the Indian head is what will eventually cause a problem. If Chief Illiniwek was offensive, the logo has to be to someone. I do agree Redskins is more obvious, but I think once they get that changed, the Blackhawks will get targeted at some point.

QUOTE (chw42 @ Jul 8, 2015 -> 02:32 PM) Yeah Boozer got the Cavs to let him out of his rookie contract with the promise to sign a 6 year deal worth $40 million with the Cavs. It made sense for both sides. Cavs would get to keep him longer while Boozer would make more than the $700k he was supposed to make in the last year of his contract. Instead, Boozer got a way better offer from Utah and signed with them. Cleveland decided not to match. I guess in this case, Cuban would be trying to go after the Clippers for tampering, but since there was no actual contract signed, he has no case. He could try going after Jordan since they had a verbal agreement, which is a lot like the Boozer situation, but there's nothing they can do legally there either. Personally, I think a verbal commitment is a commitment and a deal is a deal, but didn't Billy Donovan make a commitment to coach an NBA team years ago, but backed out? In college football, verbal commitments seemingly mean next to nothing. I'm sure Jordan's Clipper teammates called him and had a lot to do with his flip flop, but that has never been considered tampering. In fact, I would bet Cuban has had Mav players talk to guys in the past. I do think Jordan is a doofus if he backs out. It does screw Dallas a bit, and with the salary cap I find that a bit unfair.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jul 8, 2015 -> 02:00 PM) Really, you're not allowed to do that? Nope. If Soto PH for the DH, and moved to C, the pitcher hits.