Texsox

Thank you. You did really well.

Those are root beer floats, do not forget the ice cream

Hell they had to pass the Jas/Alex loyalty oath as administered by Michael

:fyou I dare you to lock your first thread :fyou :fyou

Intyeresting, and thanks. My son plays bass guitar and violin and my daughter plays bass violin and sings. I feel so left out. He learned a couple Pink Floyd tunes for the bass, really cool to hear him practicing.

Welcome to the team.

Is this an example of what you mean by misquoting? This is directly from you, word for word. Please care to explain how this isn't libel and deceitful? Beginning Quote from Jugghead on page 35 QUOTE (Texsox @ Jun 17 2004, 12:52 PM) It's pretty pointless for me to respond. Because any one with a brain reading this thread can see the obvious pattern & with that pattern it will never end: Tex makes dumb-arse assumptions (annual contracts) & dishonestly paraphrases what Juggs writes. Juggs then has to point out the stupidity in Tex's assumptions. Repeat loop .. over and over again. I'm not here to educate Tex. I didn't sign up for that job. Bf, I'll debate the last Maggs contract extension in the other thread. End of Quote :headshake

It was posted no swimming.

LMAO

Once again the Sox are stupid and built a team for the wrong stadium. I guess Kenny needs some help.

Juggs, have you found any of my libelous statements yet? How about a retraction on the quote you attributed to me that was a blatent lie? Honesty is such a simple word.

Juggs many people here pointed to your lies. I ask you again, please point mine out. You've accused me time and again. You have even making up quotes and attributing them to me. That's fact and I pointed it out to you. Yet you still have not retracted it. I will be happy to retract any statement I've made you can show me is false. Spend a few minutes, review the posts and show me one time I libeled you. One time a blatently lied on one of your quotes. Hell, your exact quotes are my best stuff.

Kobe, do you like to watch gladiator movies?

You know nthe prosecution is in trouble when juror #3 ask for a Kobe autograph . . .

Thank you Ribbie, in all the commotion I missed this. Juggs, explain something. I will agree with you that the Cell is a hitters ball park. I assume that means the ballpark favors hitters. So a team with superior hitting would be at an advantage. Why would you give up that advantage by getting rid of hitting for pitching? I thought if you have a hitters ballpark you would want great hitting? Maybe because we have great hitting we need a pitcher's ballpark? Any baseball fans want to clue me in on why if you have a hitter's ballpark, you'd trade hitting for pitching?

The confidentiality he would need for his partners to agree to is that he uses leverage to get out of contracts when he no longer thinks they are fair. I'd want that held in confidence also.

I offered to you a one post summary of everything you said and asked you to tell me which statement was a lie. You talk about my libelous paraphrasing of you, yet you do not point to any of my posts. You doctor up a quote in one of your posts, and claim it was mine. That's ok, that's an example of honesty, that's not libel? You claimed that a confidentiality ageement would prevent a company from offering a letter of recomendation. Finally an agreement that you believe is binding. Juggs, You're argument against Maggs has caused you to exagerate at best and lie at worse. You are trying to inflate your business experience to the point of being ridiculous. No one is believing you. As far as my experience in contracts. My work involves setting up international purchasing agreements. I have companies that are sourcing sub assembly components with suppliers. These contracts routingly require further sub contracting. So yes, I am familar to situation where sub contractors are in default and what happens to the prime contractor. Any supplier that does not live up to their agreements, shuts down a production line, demands price increases not outlined in the agreements, doesn't meet quality standards is not invited to participate in future projects. Production is too important to risk not getting product because someone feels they do not have to honor their word. You are right, they are rarely sued, they also are not given additional business. Contingencies are built in for currency echanges, shipping restrictions, air cargo charges if a supplier is in default, etc. A carefully negotiated contract that is negotiated in good faith is fair for everyone. Juggs, you lost this one and it's only getting worse. Quit now while you have some credibility left.

Confidentialiy agreements would not stop a company from getting a reference. They only refer to trade secrets. Why do I even bother. You lie. Enjoy your life. No wonder you favor ethics being taught in school instead of at home. This explains everything. Link to Jugghead quote Well I guess we found the poster child for failed parents and ethics training. Have a nice day.

This is not my idea of "fun with Jugs" Do we still have the hot chick thread going? If I'm stuck dealing with Jugs.

dishonest in my parahrasing?? May I offer what you lied to and implied was a quote from me That wasn't dishonest? By the way Jugghead, who's more likely to read a contract, someone who plans on living up to the agreement or someone who doesn't believe it is wrth the paper it is printed on? Oh yes, you will read it to make certain it has some leverage you can use later to get out of the contract if it doesn't favor you anymore.

I just gave you a summary of what I believe you have said. Please contradict one of those statements and I will gladly issue an appology.

look above your post and Jugghead, scroll back through the pages and find the last time anyone agreed with you.

Teach me something. If you are the owner of a company looking to open up an International Procurement office in Tiawan and hiring a firm to do that. Would you rather have Company A who believes a contract isn't worth the paper it's printed on, who has told you he uses leverage to get out of contracts he signed which he later feels are unfair. or Company B who believes his word is his bond, and has never used leverage to get out of a contract? Wouldn't it be a little scary to get half way through the project and have company A tell you that they should be getting more money and are trying to get out of the contract? Don't you think businesses make decisions based on the terms of the contract, buy materials, hire people, expand production? How could American business survive if everyone thought like you?

LMAO. I am so looking forward to west Texas next month. Nothing like a week in the moutains. Last year the Sox went on a major run while I was without access to the outside world.