RibbieRubarb

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Sep 3, 2009 -> 12:00 PM) Shut up and put on the mustache. Don't get mad at me because you like Granny porn... p.s. my mustache is on

QUOTE (Jenks Heat @ Sep 2, 2009 -> 10:16 PM) If we could only have the tool Chris Young back. /fixed

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Sep 3, 2009 -> 11:17 AM) Give me the late 60's and early 70's any day. Your age preference for actresses in porn match your music taste too...

QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Sep 2, 2009 -> 10:25 AM) f*** it, I'll say it. I want this team to lose every game from here on out. How can you root for your team to lose? I don't understand that mentality. Draft picks or no...

QUOTE (hammerhead johnson @ Sep 1, 2009 -> 11:47 PM) Please lose every game from here on out. Beckham talent aside...I will never root for my team to lose. Sorry.

Without me, you would be short....YOU'RE WELCOME!!!

To the man who once babysat Jose Contreras... HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!!

I am very excited by this! From a theme park perspective this will be great for Disney as they can expand Hollywood Studios and create a Marvel Area. This is obviously done to combat the Harry Potter land at Universal. Also this is great for Disney in a marketing sense. They really don't have a stake in the tween/teen boy demo. Pirate stuff tends to track younger. This will be big. My guess is you will see a buy-out of the liscening deal at Universal Theme parks as Disney will ramp up plans to get Marvel in there soon. BTW, I agree the Spiderman ride at Universal is one of the best. I can see them redoing it as a Transformers ride. The other rides are generic and can also be easily re-themed. Here is the latest from Screamscape.com

With Jose...we have no Championship. Thanks for being our Ace in 2005!

The Dodgers will now be my team to root for in the playoffs. So long Jim. A great player. A great guy.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Aug 31, 2009 -> 12:29 PM) If by "it" you mean the TNT to blow that dump up, then yes, I agree. I'd prefer to see it implode like the house in Poltergeist

Bring it???

One of Eastwood's BEST!

The highest groosing independent film of 2008. Fireproof's advance sales accounted for 40% of all Fandango sales the week before before the film opened. It was released on September 26, 2008 in 839 theaters. In its first weekend, Fireproof grossed $6,836,036, putting it in fourth place at the box office. In each of its first four weeks in theatrical release, it gained theaters; with 839 in its first weekend, 852 in its second, 875 in its third, 905 in its fourth, and began to slowly drop from then on. During its run, Fireproof had a domestic gross of $33,456,317,more than tripling the lifetime earnings of its predecessor, Facing the Giants, and moving it into the top 5 Christian films by earnings. Kirk Cameron is a Box Office GOD!! Oops...sorry God.

My favorite thing about Sox Park. Home run, winning game or special night. Cold beer and the pinwheels. See, I can make "FIRE" White Sox-related What's your fave?

One of Stephen King's best books turned into an awful movie... or is it??? Discuss...

QUOTE (ChiSox_Sonix @ Aug 28, 2009 -> 08:32 AM) I get to watch this with the YES announcers tonight. Oh joy. 4 years ago they were some of the best in the league, but now they're just horrible. I like that they give the same home run call to the opposite team. I would like to hear them do a "Hawk" and give a depressing "See Ya" when we hit one out.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Aug 28, 2009 -> 08:53 AM) Yeah, you missed the point totally, not that it is a real surprise. You call people lazy, yet you repeat the same old line over and over, which has been proven an urban legend. I asked you to prove something, and you gave me anecdotal evidence. I'd start looking in the mirror before you keep calling people lazy and ignorant. game.set.match. Well said Mike.

Go school!!!

Octop**** was her great grandmother, I guess. EDIT: Octop****...the name of a Bond film is censored?

QUOTE (TheBigHurt @ Aug 28, 2009 -> 04:00 AM) I understand your point and agree to a certain extent, but how do you and others get the idea that because we are barely contending in an absolutely terrible division that that means everything is clicking correctly. It's not; this team is horrendous with RISP and simply can't back up their pitching. They just never seem to click. Obviously this isn't true 100% of the time, but quite often. It has been like this for a long time, and most people agree... because it's true. And I never said anything CLOSE to suggesting the Sox aren't getting pieces. I was only questioning the direction of hitting on this team. You are changing the subject and putting words in my mouth. I agree with you! They don't know what you're talking about. Fire Walker is a good idea... Invasion USA wasn't. Why did Chuck do that movie?!?

QUOTE (TheBigHurt @ Aug 27, 2009 -> 09:28 PM) Probably a lot of them. BS? Then why does it seem our most veteran hitters seem to always attempt to knock the ball out of park rather than string hits together? Why does this offense CONTINUOUSLY fail to score runners with as little as 0 outs (a considerable amount of time we have guys at 2nd and 3rd no outs and CANNOT score). I'm sure you'll tell me it's entirely the players' doing. Bulls***. It's been like this for years now and it's getting old. SOMEONE needs to get this through to these players; apparently Walker isn't doing it. It's not like I'm making this s*** up. I do not understand this common mentality on this board with people arguing around an argument. So basically you are convinced Walker is the best possible hitting coach we could have right now, correct? I don't know why I even bother. Always lazy excuses; never an intelligent, thought-provoking argument. Seriously though...Chuck Norris was awesome! Right?

QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Aug 27, 2009 -> 12:32 PM) Or a genius like you will come in and shed light on it and make me appreciate that scene even more. Aww...shucks....

Oh...I thought announced the name of the next James Bond movie.

QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Aug 27, 2009 -> 11:18 AM) He just likes weird shots sometimes... at least in that instance... I think. Some film student will come up with a reasoning, though.