Everything posted by Eminor3rd
-
4/2: Sox vs. Braves @ 640CT - Crochet v. Reylo (weather permitting)
Sox should legitimately do nothing but bunt, every AB for about three straight games, leading up to the next Crochet start. They'll be automatic losses, sure, but after that, you gotta figure the next opponent is going to just play infield in to start. And then they let it rip in the first inning! The opponent will catch on fast, but the Sox would then have a real chance to have something like TWO baserunners on at once for Robert and, I don't know, I guess Gavin Sheets or something -- which could technically create a lead which could then technically be defended for a win.
-
4/2: Sox vs. Braves @ 640CT - Crochet v. Reylo (weather permitting)
But I bet Getz could get like 20+ DFA candidates from the Braves for him.
-
4/2: Sox vs. Braves @ 640CT - Crochet v. Reylo (weather permitting)
Crochet is going to be really fun to watch this year, if you can manage to separate his performance from a need to see an actual win.
-
Leasure to make opening day roster
Have they named a closer yet? Assuming Kopech has the inside track.
- Is DeJong key to season
-
Garrett Crochet named Opening Day starter
- 3/18 Guardians @ Sox - Thorpe toes the rubber
I forgot Moustakas was in camp lol- Cease To Padres per Passan
I don't either -- I think he was way more advanced than anyone else at that level, and probably 85% to where he needed to be to debut. And I think when he did debut, he was about 85% where he needed to be.- Cease To Padres per Passan
I agree with the premise that Moncada and Eloy were nearly finished when they were acquired, but I don’t agree that they didn’t have improvements they needed to (and largely didn’t) make afterwards. And I can certainly see what you mean by making a distinction between what you’re calling “development” vs “refinement,” don’t you think those are both parts of the process that fall under the purview of player development?- Cease To Padres per Passan
I can’t tell if you’re joking. Do you really believe player development ends in the lower minors? Even if you did, which is insane, what about the hundred or so players the Sox drafted into the system since 2017?- Cease To Padres per Passan
One article said that he was moved to relief more because they needed bullpen arms than because he couldn’t start, and another said that he’s missed a lot of development time to injuries and pandemic, so he may have more command upside than his age would indicate- Cease To Padres per Passan
After reading some more stuff this morning, I’m wondering if Getz might be planning to try to stretch Wilson out to start.- Cease To Padres per Passan
Reading Keith Law’s write ups on these guys from the Padres list last month makes this return look a lot worse.- Grade the Cease trade
C. I think it needed one more solid secondary piece if Thorpe was headliner. Swap Snelling for Thorpe or add one more guy in the Zavala range and I’d be happy.- Cease To Padres per Passan
Yeah, I liked it when I thought Dillion Head was in it. Feels one guy light to me. That said... It does sound like Iriarte has helium, and may actually belong in the tier with the other three pitchers very soon.- Cease To Padres per Passan
I mean it was already very dead before this trade.- Cease To Padres per Passan
True, and given how many signs point to regression from him, it probably isn't the wisest gamble for a rebuilder anyway. Also the Cease move probably breaks the stalemate on the free agents a bit, meaning those prices may now rise again.- Cease To Padres per Passan
Would love that, but I think telling Lorenzen he can just have Cease's salary and telling Jerry we're budget neutral will be too convenient.- Cease To Padres per Passan
I'll be pretty surprised if we get more than one of the top 5. Just realistically, there are ton of great secondaries. I'll be satisfied with one of those pitchers and three real secondaries.- Cease To Padres per Passan
Michael Lorenzen is the real winner- Cease To Padres per Passan
Yeah, that's who I meant. I think I heard on a fantasy podcast that he has a good chance of being on the roster this year, so my guess is that if Preller is making a win-now move, he's going to want to keep Merrill to play him this year.- Cease To Padres per Passan
I'm guessing Salas was untouchable, and Merrill looks like he might make the roster, so they kinda need him. I would think one of the top three pitchers HAS to be the headliner (Snelling, Thorpe, Lesko), and we could maybe dream that we got two of them.- Cease To Padres per Passan
It's a good system. Assuming you can't get Salas or their other untouchable guy (I forget), I'm actually okay with a volume approach here. Part of the Sox failure has always been to fail to understand the VOLUME of talent you need in a system to actually sustain a competitive window. Maybe that's something Getz sees and want to finally change.- Cease To Padres per Passan
I don't think anyone could have reasonably predicted that both Snell and Montgomery would stay on the market this long, but given that DID happen, it isn't surprising at all that a Cease trade didn't come together before now. Both Boras and the White Sox are trying to maximize their value, and the teams that need pitching have been waiting for one or the other to blink. The warts with the Boras guys' peripherals are obvious to even casual fans at this point, and Getz is demanding top dollar because he has so few pieces to spur this rebuild. I think Getz has been wise to hold, and I'm impressed with his poker so far. We'll see what the return is, of course, but giving in to a lowball because of the presence of Snell/Montgomery on the market would have been a bad move no matter what, even granting that holding for the deadline wasn't ideal. All that said, the return is likely not going to be what we've all been dreaming of lol.- 2024 - MLB Draft Thread
Swing reminds me of Gordon Beckham, weirdly? - 3/18 Guardians @ Sox - Thorpe toes the rubber