Everything posted by Bob Sacamano
-
Brett Lawrie Settles
Nice! Save some money from what was projected.
-
White Sox News FA / Rumors / News
Nats acquire Derek Norris.
-
White Sox to Move Eaton?
QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Dec 2, 2016 -> 02:03 PM) Why do so many think Eaton would cause problems? My God, he's been fine and been on bad teams his entire career. Oh my God, a player who actually wants to win. How dare he. . Lol right? I don't get why people think he's going to lash out. Completely different scenario to the whole LaRoche fiasco.
-
PIT/NATs in talks for McCutchen
QUOTE (raBBit @ Dec 2, 2016 -> 01:16 PM) My word is soft right now haha. But the the one thing I would say that isn't really talked about much is that I'd expect Dan Jennings to go this offseason. Supposedly garnering a lot of interest. This makes sense to me. Thanks.
-
PIT/NATs in talks for McCutchen
QUOTE (raBBit @ Dec 2, 2016 -> 01:09 PM) This is based on what exactly? Hey rabbit, I feel like if you did you would tell us but do you have any nuggets for us?
-
White Sox to Move Eaton?
QUOTE (DirtySox @ Dec 2, 2016 -> 11:43 AM) Mention in Heyman article that Eaton is a Washington option. Easy to make that connection since they are looking at another CF.
-
Braves among teams showing interest in chris sale
QUOTE (steveno89 @ Dec 2, 2016 -> 11:29 AM) Not a bad buy low move for Atlanta on Jackson, but a player who is hitting around .200 in single A with a ton of strikeouts chances of sniffing the majors are hugely in doubt. I see this more as Seattle dumping Jackson for whatever value they can get before he isn't worth anything Still has a lot of time to turn it around but you're probably right.
-
White Sox News FA / Rumors / News
QUOTE (bmags @ Dec 2, 2016 -> 09:59 AM) Yes I'm sure they are really "sleeping" on people, nobody has known they are shopping Sale QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Dec 2, 2016 -> 10:58 AM) I laughed when I saw that as well. Me too. Its been speculated they could rebuild for months lol
-
Players non-tendered
So far just Bryan Holady of the Red Sox.
-
White Sox to Move Eaton?
QUOTE (Baron @ Dec 2, 2016 -> 10:30 AM) I just hate getting rid of a very good defensive corner OFer. "But we still have Melky!" -Hawk probably.
-
White Sox to Move Eaton?
QUOTE (steveno89 @ Dec 2, 2016 -> 10:02 AM) Puig's value is in the toilet right now. I laughed at the talk of him being a centerpiece in a Sale trade. I am not against a fire Sale (no pun intended), but would prefer to move pieces like Robertson, Cabrera, Frazier first before tading longer term assets Don't think anyone proposed deals where he is the center piece. Just because a guy is listed first in proposals doesn't mean hes the main piece
-
White Sox to Move Eaton?
I prefer to keep Eaton but won't complain if we receive a great return for him.
-
PIT/NATs in talks for McCutchen
Why would we want a declining Andrew McCutchen? He's a corner outtielder now anyway (or at least should be).
-
Will Brett Lawrie be Non-Tendered?
QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Dec 2, 2016 -> 05:43 AM) Considering his Twitter hasn't mentioned the White Sox since that day he changed his description, I think we know the answer. Maybe they are trying to trade him. Yeah I was mostly referring to seeing if he gets dealt for peanuts or non-tendered.
-
Will Brett Lawrie be Non-Tendered?
We'll see if anything happens today. Anyone know what time the deadline is?
-
Braves among teams showing interest in chris sale
QUOTE (Baron @ Dec 1, 2016 -> 06:29 PM) They are collecting the 1 year deal pitchers that's for sure They want their young starters to earn their spots. These guys on one year deals make them tradeable later in the season or at the very worst, releasing them.
-
Braves among teams showing interest in chris sale
QUOTE (bmags @ Dec 1, 2016 -> 05:27 PM) Braves didn't give up much. I know he had a pretty bad year last year but I like move for Braves, who either will catch career years from all or the worst of every one of those guys they acquired. Yeah I like the moves they made. That way you don't need to rush arms. But I thought they already enough guys who were at least decent call ups last year who would crack the rotation this season.
-
White Sox News FA / Rumors / News
QUOTE (Jose Paniagua @ Dec 1, 2016 -> 04:38 PM) There's no place for this necessarily here, but a friend met Curtis Granderson and asked about him ever playing for the White Sox. His reply was along the lines of-- when free agency comes up 'we'll see' Your 2018 rebuilding, leadership role in the dugout DH.
-
PIT/NATs in talks for McCutchen
QUOTE (ChiliIrishHammock24 @ Dec 1, 2016 -> 04:16 PM) The Nationals acquiring Cutch puts their OF situation as....Werth, Cutch, Turner, Harper, Revere. And with a full infield, that really doesn't leave Trea Turner with a chance to move back to SS either, as Espinosa is actually a very good defensive SS with HR pop. I wonder if that makes Turner expendable in a Sale trade. Assuming they trade Robles and Fedde for Cutch, maybe a Sale trade would be Turner, Lopez, Stevenson, and Severino, allowing them to keep Giolito as a compromise for giving up Turner. In Turner, we are talking a guy that is even more valuable than Bregman. Turner put up a 3.3 WAR in only 73 games! That's a pace for 7 WAR. Hell, the package I suggested may actually be 1 player too many. I think the Nats getting Cutch and Houston getting EE could work out BEAUTIFULLY for us in our ability to strip both clubs of their best young prospect. Yeah what the poster above said, they would non-tender Espinosa and his projected $5.3 million and move Turner to short and use the money somewhere else.
-
PIT/NATs in talks for McCutchen
QUOTE (PolishPrince34 @ Dec 1, 2016 -> 02:30 PM) I would be on the phone with the Nationals regarding Eaton. If Robles was the headliner plus more I would jump all over it. Robles is one the highest ceiling players in all of minors. He's 2 years away, but love all 5 tools. If Pirates can get Robles plus more for a declining McCutchen . Eaton's value is never going to be higher. I would be on the phone with Rizzo. I never thought of that. And with Eaton having 5 years of control he'd better to acquire.
-
Charlie Tilson
QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Dec 1, 2016 -> 01:55 PM) He got hurt. What could be more Griffey-esque than that? Lmao brilliant
-
Lawrie/Garcia could be non-tenders
QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Dec 1, 2016 -> 12:53 PM) Avi is no part of a future, and he's not good enough to help a competing club either, so he should be non-tendered. But it's the Sox, and they likely keep him around. Lawrie is a tougher one, it kinda depends on their plan for 2017. If it was up to me, I'd tender Lawrie. His injury must be a lot more severe than we all originally thought.
-
Lawrie/Garcia could be non-tenders
QUOTE (Ro Da Don @ Dec 1, 2016 -> 10:57 AM) These are my thoughts exact. I've said this previously - his exit velocities last year, coupled with his launch angles, his first year using a completely new swing, and his age (he's 25!). IIRC, his exit velos (I know, it's not everything) were better than Bryant and Rizzo in 2016. I'm not ready to write him off completely until I see what he does on a rebuilding team with a new manager in 2017. I think they need to get him out in left (the "hide the glove" position") and try to see if he can look somewhat competent in the field to go along with his adjustments at the plate. That dude better be working his ass off right now.
-
PIT/NATs in talks for McCutchen
QUOTE (Dunt @ Dec 1, 2016 -> 12:38 PM) Robles is a 19 yr old in Single A, they have plenty of time with their current OF and will probably do the same thing they are doing now with Cutch with Marte in a few seasons. Actually pretty smart on their part. Thats a good point. I didn't realize he was 19 only.
-
PIT/NATs in talks for McCutchen
QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Dec 1, 2016 -> 12:24 PM) They're moving Meadows to LF in AAA next season and putting Marte in CF. Still somewhat of a log-jam with Polanco and Robles.