December 2, 20169 yr Jon HeymanVerified account @JonHeyman brett lawrie, chisox settle at $3.5M Link Edited December 2, 20169 yr by Sleepy Harold
December 2, 20169 yr WELL THEN Not a bad price either. what DA Said. Edited December 2, 20169 yr by Knuckles
December 2, 20169 yr Author QUOTE (Chet Kincaid @ Dec 2, 2016 -> 05:46 PM) This is starting to feel like we're buyers and not sellers. What is there left to buy?
December 2, 20169 yr QUOTE (Chet Kincaid @ Dec 2, 2016 -> 05:46 PM) This is starting to feel like we're buyers and not sellers. Lawrie wouldn't get you much on the trade market. You aren't paying him a ton. Rebuilding teams get guys like this, hope he has a big year and flip him at the deadline.
December 2, 20169 yr QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Dec 2, 2016 -> 03:51 PM) They are putting the band back together. The band of suck
December 2, 20169 yr Thats a steal actually. Hope he stays. I've been a big Lawrie fan since before he came to the South Side.
December 3, 20169 yr QUOTE (Sleepy Harold @ Dec 3, 2016 -> 12:42 AM) Jon HeymanVerified account @JonHeyman brett lawrie, chisox settle at $3.5M Link I think this is a solid move. Brett plays with intensity and leaves it all in the field. Saladino is our super sub and probably see Sanchez as IF backup in '17
December 3, 20169 yr QUOTE (fathom @ Dec 2, 2016 -> 05:47 PM) Cost certainty for upcoming trade Can you elaborate as to what you mean by this post?
December 3, 20169 yr I'm happy he's back, but bring both Avi and Lawrie makes me nervous the Sox aren't going to sell... Although, with Smith gone the 40-Man is now at 38. That's 3 openings for new players if a trade is made. Edited December 3, 20169 yr by CWSpalehoseCWS
December 3, 20169 yr This is worse than re-signing Avi. Does Rick Hahn actually think Lawrie's a good player?
December 3, 20169 yr QUOTE (GreenSox @ Dec 2, 2016 -> 06:16 PM) This is worse than re-signing Avi. Does Rick Hahn actually think Lawrie's a good player? There's really not much to b**** about here unless you're looking for something to b**** about here.
December 3, 20169 yr QUOTE (GreenSox @ Dec 2, 2016 -> 06:16 PM) This is worse than re-signing Avi. Does Rick Hahn actually think Lawrie's a good player? Lol, clueless comment.
December 3, 20169 yr QUOTE (GreenSox @ Dec 2, 2016 -> 06:16 PM) This is worse than re-signing Avi. Does Rick Hahn actually think Lawrie's a good player? QUOTE (ChiSox59 @ Dec 2, 2016 -> 06:20 PM) Lol, clueless comment. What's new honestly with him? Lawrie is good depth in case Frazier does get traded or he could even be packaged in a bigger deal. 3.5 million is extremely team friendly.
December 3, 20169 yr QUOTE (Heads22 @ Dec 2, 2016 -> 06:19 PM) There's really not much to b**** about here unless you're looking for something to b**** about here. It's a position in which the Sox have depth that can at least replicate Lawrie. $3 million here, $4 million there. it adds up. And the Sox have squandered a lot with such signings of bad players.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.