Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Sox still looking at Puig?

Featured Replies

Marisnick or one of the losers in the Mets' outfield battle would be a decent pick-up.

Nimmo, J.D. Davis and Conforto are expected to be the starters.

They also have Domonic Smith and Cespedes (all the Cubans, if they come with a huge salary subsidy).

  • Replies 307
  • Views 31.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • If you're planning a starting lineup (even a weak side platoon) that requires moving guys around so that you can get ABs for Adam Engel, you're probably doing something wrong 

  • The Sox are gambling on Mazara turning things around. The Rangers were not able to get him to stop chasing balls out of the zone and grounding out.   Grounding into inning killing double plays could g

  • chitownsportsfan
    chitownsportsfan

    tell parkman to hand your account back over.

Posted Images

2 minutes ago, Moan4Yoan said:

Not really.  We just know that Engel is bad and would like an upgrade.

Pillar sucks too. 

3 minutes ago, caulfield12 said:

Marisnick or one of the losers in the Mets' outfield battle would be a decent pick-up.

Nimmo, J.D. Davis and Conforto are expected to be the starters.

They also have Domonic Smith and Cespedes (all the Cubans, if they come with a huge salary subsidy).

The Mets just traded for Marisnick and he’s a terrible hitter.  I would hope we do better than him as a righty OF option.

5 minutes ago, HOFHurt35 said:

Pillar sucks too. 

He’s an improvement over Engel.

Honestly, platooning Engel and using only against lefties / as a defensive replacement would be similar and cheaper to Pillar. 

4 minutes ago, daggins said:

Honestly, platooning Engel and using only against lefties / as a defensive replacement would be similar and cheaper to Pillar. 

The problem is he has much less of a track record offensively.

13 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

The problem is he has much less of a track record offensively.

89 plate appearances against lefties last season have people convinced Engel is a legit platoon option since he did this:

.313 .360 .482 .841

Meanwhile, here are Engel’s career splits against lefties in 307 plate appearances:

.252 .298 .381 .679

 

Edited by Moan4Yoan

1 minute ago, YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! said:

 

Steve Stone confirms — Castellanos it is!  ?

7 minutes ago, Moan4Yoan said:

89 plate appearances against lefties last season have people convinced Engel is a legit platoon option since he did this:

.313 .360 .482 .841

Meanwhile, here are Engel’s career splits against lefties in 307 plate appearances:

.252 .298 .381 .679

 

I mean, sure Engel sucks, but he's cheap and it's like 150 PA. I'd prefer an upgrade, obviously, but I don't really think Pillar is an upgrade. Maybe Hunter Pence?

They are not signing Puig.   Puig is all fake smoke.   Any addition will come via trade if at all.  The Red Sox need to reduce about 15-20 million to get under tax.  

Just now, daggins said:

I mean, sure Engel sucks, but he's cheap and it's like 150 PA. I'd prefer an upgrade, obviously, but I don't really think Pillar is an upgrade. Maybe Hunter Pence?

I’d prefer a guy who can still play some CF and RF.  I doubt he can play CF but how is Pence’s RF defense these days?

Just now, Moan4Yoan said:

I’d prefer a guy who can still play some CF and RF.  I doubt he can play CF but how is Pence’s RF defense these days?

Pretty bad, he's old and he was never a stellar defender. He can fake it, though. I guess it depends on what the money looks like. Engel is practically free, at least for one more season, and a good defender, which are the only points in his favor.

 

8 minutes ago, Mbs1969 said:

They are not signing Puig.   Puig is all fake smoke.   Any addition will come via trade if at all.  The Red Sox need to reduce about 15-20 million to get under tax.  

Eyeballs?

9 minutes ago, Mbs1969 said:

They are not signing Puig.   Puig is all fake smoke.   Any addition will come via trade if at all.  The Red Sox need to reduce about 15-20 million to get under tax.  

Who are they targeting from Boston?

5 minutes ago, SoxAce said:

 

He didn’t say no Betts or no JDM!  ?

At this point, the Red Sox are knocking on doors, not the White Sox.  

17 minutes ago, Mbs1969 said:

They are not signing Puig.   Puig is all fake smoke.   Any addition will come via trade if at all.  The Red Sox need to reduce about 15-20 million to get under tax.  

So are you suggesting Betts then?  There really isn’t anyone else that makes sense.

1 minute ago, Chicago White Sox said:

So are you suggesting Betts then?  There really isn’t anyone else that makes sense.

Betts makes zero sense too.

2 minutes ago, SonofaRoache said:

He would make sense for Timmy's tweet. 

Would have to be betts or JDM. Agree JDM makes no sense. Would they pull the trigger on a one year betts rental? 

2 minutes ago, SonofaRoache said:

He would make sense for Timmy's tweet. 

Timmy’s tweet was a load of crap, just like 90% of his tweets.

3 minutes ago, CWSpalehoseCWS said:

Betts makes zero sense too.

Yep, Hahn isn’t stupid enough to trade young talent for one year of Betts’ services.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.