Just now, soxfan49 said:

Wait, why didn't Renteria keep Detwiler in with a LHH coming up?

Because he would have to face the 3 batter minimum at that point and Ricky would rather throw gasoline on the fire

Just now, soxfan49 said:

Wait, why didn't Renteria keep Detwiler in with a LHH coming up?

? ....Because he's bad at bullpen management?

If the Sox were interested in winning they would've cut Encarnacion two weeks ago and figured out a permanent solution with McCann, this is laughable.  dude hitting .167 with less homers than Tim Anderson is our DH

fuck you Jerry, lol

 

He throws that again and sano goes deep 

Question is... can Cishek finish the night with a below 6 ERA?

Quit throwing the belt high pitch inside!!!

Cishek's best pitch of the year, and we didn't get to see it.  

5 minutes ago, HahnsKiddieTable said:

Get rid of EE how long do we have to see this shit for

ikr, what a horrible signing that was.  total waste of money.

Really wish we had Castellanos as a DH ?

They are waiting on EE to heat up in the next 150 at bats to carry us for a few weeks.

 

2 minutes ago, HahnsKiddieTable said:

Because he would have to face the 3 batter minimum at that point and Ricky would rather throw gasoline on the fire

I thought you have a 3 batter minimum only if you start an inning new. Because he pitched the prior inning, I thought he could be taken out after 1 batter here, or no?

5 minutes ago, fathom said:

It just shouldn’t be this difficult to find offense from that spot

It isn’t we have multiple viable options for the spot. 

1 minute ago, Soxnfins said:

Really wish we had Castellanos as a DH ?

Oh yeah? Wow here's a new thought. Haven't heard it before. Good thinking

Just now, soxfan49 said:

I thought you have a 3 batter minimum only if you start an inning new. Because he pitched the prior inning, I thought he could be taken out after 1 batter here, or no?

Nope

Just now, soxfan49 said:

I thought you have a 3 batter minimum only if you start an inning new. Because he pitched the prior inning, I thought he could be taken out after 1 batter here, or no?

You can finish an inning however if you start the next you must face the minimum of 3 batters. 

1 minute ago, soxfan49 said:

I thought you have a 3 batter minimum only if you start an inning new. Because he pitched the prior inning, I thought he could be taken out after 1 batter here, or no?

I believe he could be taken out at any point since he finished an inning 

Just now, ShoeLessRob said:

It isn’t we have multiple viable options for the spot. 

I mean with their history of terrible free agent signings for the spot.  

Just now, Soxnfins said:

I believe he could be taken out at any point since he finished an inning 

Not true. We had this argument a week ago. If he starts the next inning he must face a total of 3 batters combined 

I was the person wrong btw

Edited September 2, 20205 yr by HahnsKiddieTable

Just now, HahnsKiddieTable said:

Not true. We had this argument a week ago. If he starts the next inning he must face a total of 3 batters combined 

Ok

Oh what the hell, get Cishek a W!!  Let's Go!!!

Great inning. Eloy single, Robert homer please 

2 minutes ago, HahnsKiddieTable said:

You can finish an inning however if you start the next you must face the minimum of 3 batters. 

 

2 minutes ago, fathom said:

Nope

 

Huh, I guess I understood it wrong. Thanks.

Cishek for MVP

We need an eloy gapper and a Robert HR

Nice inning by Steve